They've tried doing that for years, both are stupid as like everything in life, moderation is usually the best policy which is helped by sex with a partner.
Except war, there if you truly want to win you don't stop till you get an unconditional surrender and go more brutal than any gangbang porn.
Worked with Japan, the good thing is after the allies showed mercy and helped them rebuild (since new enemy communists were nearby) it allowed time for reflection so that they didn't go "well we lost, better try harder next time"
The problem with a lot of 'wars' after was there was no end point, no clear conclusion where one side lost, the victor had a choice and if they chose mercy they had the chance to build a new ally. As 'the war on terror' wtf is that!? A motivational poster for the arms industry?
Well, there was the English conquest of New France, which is why Quebec exists, and why Louis Real was a thing; they allowed the French Catholics to remain French Catholics rather than forcing assimilation into British culture. Which led to decades of English-French infighting, which has been largely forgotten because of mass immigration and the problems that brings.
It's a tactic. It works when you're winning and your enemies are weak or stupid enough to accept those terms. When you are in no position to dictate terms or you start believing your own bullshit, then it is foolishness.
At 61 my need for emptying the seminal vesicles is nowhere near as urgent as it once was. I could easily go a month. God knows the old lady wouldn't mind.
Not masturbation; ejaculation. Big difference. It is working out a part of your body, clearing yourself of stagnating cells, and stimulating your body to produce more, to not shut itself down in dormancy.
And doing it with an adult human female who you are in a long-term relationship with, is better. Hormonal balancing then becomes an included element and whatnot.
That aside, get outta here with your Kantian morality. Plenty of immoral actions lead to healthier results. A thief with the options of stealing cheap wonderbread, or much more expensive healthier food, well, stealing more expensive stuff would be more immoral, but clearly, more healthy, to use an extremely cut-and-dry example. Your body ultimately does not care about your morality. Your soul does, but your soul doesn't get cancer. At least, not that we know of.
It's for guys who can only live in extremes and cannot moderate their own behaviour. Either never jerking it or jerking multiple times a day. Both are shit options.
It's like with alcohol - either people are completely dry or drunk all the time. The willpower to moderate the drinking is just not there. Meanwhile normal people occasionally drink something and maybe even get drunk a few times a year and that's it.
I've always just hated alcohol and live perfectly fine without it, this notion that you need it in your life to any degree is just false. Same thing goes with fast food, give me a lean home cooked meal over a sweaty whopper any day.
No Nut November was already a perversion of No Fap November
They've tried doing that for years, both are stupid as like everything in life, moderation is usually the best policy which is helped by sex with a partner.
Except war, there if you truly want to win you don't stop till you get an unconditional surrender and go more brutal than any gangbang porn.
Seeking unconditional surrender is not a good policy.
Worked with Japan, the good thing is after the allies showed mercy and helped them rebuild (since new enemy communists were nearby) it allowed time for reflection so that they didn't go "well we lost, better try harder next time"
The problem with a lot of 'wars' after was there was no end point, no clear conclusion where one side lost, the victor had a choice and if they chose mercy they had the chance to build a new ally. As 'the war on terror' wtf is that!? A motivational poster for the arms industry?
Well, there was the English conquest of New France, which is why Quebec exists, and why Louis Real was a thing; they allowed the French Catholics to remain French Catholics rather than forcing assimilation into British culture. Which led to decades of English-French infighting, which has been largely forgotten because of mass immigration and the problems that brings.
You've described ALL English/French relations, though that can describe all the UK, reminds me of my favourite joke about Britain:
Britain is the most tolerant country in the world why,
The Scots hate the English, The Welsh hate the English, The Irish hate the English, The English hate everyone including the majority of the English
That's why they are the most tolerant people in the world, living and working with people they can't bloody stand!
It's a tactic. It works when you're winning and your enemies are weak or stupid enough to accept those terms. When you are in no position to dictate terms or you start believing your own bullshit, then it is foolishness.
A "kill them all" policy has its own problems.
At 61 my need for emptying the seminal vesicles is nowhere near as urgent as it once was. I could easily go a month. God knows the old lady wouldn't mind.
Please, let's not associate this with a squirrel comedy legend.
November is just a month that's it.
Is the link between masturbation and cancer real? I can't imagine immoral actions leading to healthier results.
Not masturbation; ejaculation. Big difference. It is working out a part of your body, clearing yourself of stagnating cells, and stimulating your body to produce more, to not shut itself down in dormancy.
And doing it with an adult human female who you are in a long-term relationship with, is better. Hormonal balancing then becomes an included element and whatnot.
That aside, get outta here with your Kantian morality. Plenty of immoral actions lead to healthier results. A thief with the options of stealing cheap wonderbread, or much more expensive healthier food, well, stealing more expensive stuff would be more immoral, but clearly, more healthy, to use an extremely cut-and-dry example. Your body ultimately does not care about your morality. Your soul does, but your soul doesn't get cancer. At least, not that we know of.
But is the lack of ejaculation really linked to prostate cancer? Do chaste monks get more cancer?
What, you don’t trust the science? /s
Since the last NNN, I've gotten increasingly annoyed at coomer activity.
When did the kids start calling it "nut", and why are they out to prove kids should be seen and not heard?
Like 15 years ago, at least.
It's for guys who can only live in extremes and cannot moderate their own behaviour. Either never jerking it or jerking multiple times a day. Both are shit options.
It's like with alcohol - either people are completely dry or drunk all the time. The willpower to moderate the drinking is just not there. Meanwhile normal people occasionally drink something and maybe even get drunk a few times a year and that's it.
I've always just hated alcohol and live perfectly fine without it, this notion that you need it in your life to any degree is just false. Same thing goes with fast food, give me a lean home cooked meal over a sweaty whopper any day.
It's just for one month.
Yeah but that is exactly why the "you gotta jerk" argument falls short
You do realize that you don't have to jerk off to cycle through sperm