The problem with this "gen Z will save us" narrative is that it doesn't factor in the teenagers tend to do a 180 on their beliefs once they enter adulthood. I remember when I was in high school and all of my friends were some of the most vulgar anti PC edgelords, but once they entered college which coincided with woke PC shit being pushed everywhere, they all sold out.
Also most women in america don't identify as a feminist because they hate the label which associates them with fat blue haired femcels, however they like the privileges that feminism has given them. Even if you told a "trad" woman that you support a hard patriarchy as seen in the old testament, she will call you an extremist incel.
At the very least it's true that most people are cowards.
On the other side, the new generations are getting hit in the face right from the get go with the worst extremes of the ideology. There's no slippery slope easing into trans child mutilation, because a few of their peers are jumping headlong into it. They see the fruits right away, in all it's horror, without habituation. It makes sense that they'd feel repulsion.
The current generation is also coming of age in a post truth era where any dissent is actively being purged and demonized while the internet becomes more centralized.
In the 80's conservatives thought the millennials would be a based and red pilled generation because they're born during the Reagan revolution and they will spite the whiny leftism of gen X, but instead the millennials have been the worst generation so far which makes me fear for gen z.
Gen z is a mixed bag, one hand they seem more conservative ideologically in terms of reducing government involvement and towards the old guard of authority (leftists)
On the other, they've been hit hard thanks to the trans push that it's wrecked too many of them from being able to have a family in the future.
If the tide turns on the trans push AND they bear a grudge, it just means the death rates stay the same but instead of suicide it's suicide attacks.
Just a hypothesis I'm thinking through but if you're body has been maimed, you are denied your ability to build a family biologically, everytime you look in the mirror you see the damage done, it disgusts you and you know it was done because of an ideology that used you as a pawn, you'd want to die but in a way that takes them with you.
If the tide turns on the trans crap, they may bear a grudge against those who let their bodies be destroyed.
That's the point, they are meant to be the vanguard of a marxist revolution. Pushing kids to be trans is meant to destroy any chance they have of a future so they can be used as human bullets.
Well, yeah. Feminists have accrued a substantial amount of power by now and so are subject to the wrong side of Alinsky's rules. That's one of the reasons feminists are so intent on playing the victim, but by this point it's kinda wearing threadbare, when offending a feminist means that you can no longer work anywhere with an HR department.
Easily the most polarized generation. Their range of views encompass everything from “there is no biological difference between the sexes” to “it’s okay to be white”.
Wait, so Tavistock was closed because it did 'too little damage' to boys, and yet Rotherham raping 14,000 girls did just fine doing more damage to boys than girls?
I don't think you will find even one person to agree with your delusion on that one.
The cover-ups in those areas were invaluable in keeping their openly misandrist female MPs in power.
Yeah, like I said, no one actually buys that, because it's batshit crazy that allowing 14,000 girls to be raped did more harm to men than it did to women.
Those MPs will likely get more power if Rishi Sunak fails to win re-election and Labour returns to power.
By the time the supposed election rolls around, you will hate him as much as De Pfeffer and will cheer his probable defeat.
They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
But Impy, earlier you said that they base decisions on how much harm it does to men vs. women. Are you arguing that covering up Rotherham did more harm to men than women?
Sunak has done some good things already.
Agreed. Much better than that idiot Truss whom you were supporting in the first selection. Doesn't mean he will win though.
Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
I hope he does, because right-wing populism is the only way to win. There is no other way.
The problem with this "gen Z will save us" narrative is that it doesn't factor in the teenagers tend to do a 180 on their beliefs once they enter adulthood. I remember when I was in high school and all of my friends were some of the most vulgar anti PC edgelords, but once they entered college which coincided with woke PC shit being pushed everywhere, they all sold out.
Also most women in america don't identify as a feminist because they hate the label which associates them with fat blue haired femcels, however they like the privileges that feminism has given them. Even if you told a "trad" woman that you support a hard patriarchy as seen in the old testament, she will call you an extremist incel.
At the very least it's true that most people are cowards.
On the other side, the new generations are getting hit in the face right from the get go with the worst extremes of the ideology. There's no slippery slope easing into trans child mutilation, because a few of their peers are jumping headlong into it. They see the fruits right away, in all it's horror, without habituation. It makes sense that they'd feel repulsion.
The current generation is also coming of age in a post truth era where any dissent is actively being purged and demonized while the internet becomes more centralized.
In the 80's conservatives thought the millennials would be a based and red pilled generation because they're born during the Reagan revolution and they will spite the whiny leftism of gen X, but instead the millennials have been the worst generation so far which makes me fear for gen z.
Gen z is a mixed bag, one hand they seem more conservative ideologically in terms of reducing government involvement and towards the old guard of authority (leftists)
On the other, they've been hit hard thanks to the trans push that it's wrecked too many of them from being able to have a family in the future.
If the tide turns on the trans crap, they may bear a grudge against those who let their bodies be destroyed.
But I'm not hopeful.
If the tide turns on the trans push AND they bear a grudge, it just means the death rates stay the same but instead of suicide it's suicide attacks.
Just a hypothesis I'm thinking through but if you're body has been maimed, you are denied your ability to build a family biologically, everytime you look in the mirror you see the damage done, it disgusts you and you know it was done because of an ideology that used you as a pawn, you'd want to die but in a way that takes them with you.
That's the point, they are meant to be the vanguard of a marxist revolution. Pushing kids to be trans is meant to destroy any chance they have of a future so they can be used as human bullets.
Well, yeah. Feminists have accrued a substantial amount of power by now and so are subject to the wrong side of Alinsky's rules. That's one of the reasons feminists are so intent on playing the victim, but by this point it's kinda wearing threadbare, when offending a feminist means that you can no longer work anywhere with an HR department.
Easily the most polarized generation. Their range of views encompass everything from “there is no biological difference between the sexes” to “it’s okay to be white”.
Oh bullshit. No such "community" exists.
Maybe they polled Gen Z Arabs.
You've never been able to explain Rotherham.
Clearly, it's not about women's best interests when they let 14,000 young girls be raped for years on end.
Wait, so Tavistock was closed because it did 'too little damage' to boys, and yet Rotherham raping 14,000 girls did just fine doing more damage to boys than girls?
I don't think you will find even one person to agree with your delusion on that one.
Yeah, like I said, no one actually buys that, because it's batshit crazy that allowing 14,000 girls to be raped did more harm to men than it did to women.
By the time the supposed election rolls around, you will hate him as much as De Pfeffer and will cheer his probable defeat.
But Impy, earlier you said that they base decisions on how much harm it does to men vs. women. Are you arguing that covering up Rotherham did more harm to men than women?
Agreed. Much better than that idiot Truss whom you were supporting in the first selection. Doesn't mean he will win though.
I hope he does, because right-wing populism is the only way to win. There is no other way.