Wait, so Tavistock was closed because it did 'too little damage' to boys, and yet Rotherham raping 14,000 girls did just fine doing more damage to boys than girls?
I don't think you will find even one person to agree with your delusion on that one.
The cover-ups in those areas were invaluable in keeping their openly misandrist female MPs in power.
Yeah, like I said, no one actually buys that, because it's batshit crazy that allowing 14,000 girls to be raped did more harm to men than it did to women.
Those MPs will likely get more power if Rishi Sunak fails to win re-election and Labour returns to power.
By the time the supposed election rolls around, you will hate him as much as De Pfeffer and will cheer his probable defeat.
You've never been able to explain Rotherham.
Clearly, it's not about women's best interests when they let 14,000 young girls be raped for years on end.
What is there to explain? Collateral damage is acceptable as long as it causes more harm to the enemy in the long run.
Same reason they closed Tavistock. Too little damage for what was being risked.
Wait, so Tavistock was closed because it did 'too little damage' to boys, and yet Rotherham raping 14,000 girls did just fine doing more damage to boys than girls?
I don't think you will find even one person to agree with your delusion on that one.
The cover-ups in those areas were invaluable in keeping their openly misandrist female MPs in power.
Those MPs will likely get more power if Rishi Sunak fails to win re-election and Labour returns to power.
Yeah, like I said, no one actually buys that, because it's batshit crazy that allowing 14,000 girls to be raped did more harm to men than it did to women.
By the time the supposed election rolls around, you will hate him as much as De Pfeffer and will cheer his probable defeat.