The cover-ups in those areas were invaluable in keeping their openly misandrist female MPs in power.
Yeah, like I said, no one actually buys that, because it's batshit crazy that allowing 14,000 girls to be raped did more harm to men than it did to women.
Those MPs will likely get more power if Rishi Sunak fails to win re-election and Labour returns to power.
By the time the supposed election rolls around, you will hate him as much as De Pfeffer and will cheer his probable defeat.
"Feminists covered up mass rapes to retain power" isn't a good headline. They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
Sunak has done some good things already. Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
But Impy, earlier you said that they base decisions on how much harm it does to men vs. women. Are you arguing that covering up Rotherham did more harm to men than women?
Sunak has done some good things already.
Agreed. Much better than that idiot Truss whom you were supporting in the first selection. Doesn't mean he will win though.
Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
I hope he does, because right-wing populism is the only way to win. There is no other way.
I'm arguing that they don't actually care about rape unless they can use it as a bludgeon against men's existence. The cover-up allowed them to retain power and continue attacking men from that position.
I never supported Truss.
The markets will collapse. The FTSE is propped up solely by the huge gains of oil and gas. It would be a huge mistake.
The cover-ups in those areas were invaluable in keeping their openly misandrist female MPs in power.
Those MPs will likely get more power if Rishi Sunak fails to win re-election and Labour returns to power.
Yeah, like I said, no one actually buys that, because it's batshit crazy that allowing 14,000 girls to be raped did more harm to men than it did to women.
By the time the supposed election rolls around, you will hate him as much as De Pfeffer and will cheer his probable defeat.
"Feminists covered up mass rapes to retain power" isn't a good headline. They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
Sunak has done some good things already. Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
But Impy, earlier you said that they base decisions on how much harm it does to men vs. women. Are you arguing that covering up Rotherham did more harm to men than women?
Agreed. Much better than that idiot Truss whom you were supporting in the first selection. Doesn't mean he will win though.
I hope he does, because right-wing populism is the only way to win. There is no other way.
I'm arguing that they don't actually care about rape unless they can use it as a bludgeon against men's existence. The cover-up allowed them to retain power and continue attacking men from that position.
I never supported Truss.
The markets will collapse. The FTSE is propped up solely by the huge gains of oil and gas. It would be a huge mistake.