"Feminists covered up mass rapes to retain power" isn't a good headline. They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
Sunak has done some good things already. Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
But Impy, earlier you said that they base decisions on how much harm it does to men vs. women. Are you arguing that covering up Rotherham did more harm to men than women?
Sunak has done some good things already.
Agreed. Much better than that idiot Truss whom you were supporting in the first selection. Doesn't mean he will win though.
Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
I hope he does, because right-wing populism is the only way to win. There is no other way.
I'm arguing that they don't actually care about rape unless they can use it as a bludgeon against men's existence. The cover-up allowed them to retain power and continue attacking men from that position.
I never supported Truss.
The markets will collapse. The FTSE is propped up solely by the huge gains of oil and gas. It would be a huge mistake.
I'm arguing that they don't actually care about rape unless they can use it as a bludgeon against men's existence.
Yeah, that's what makes your argument even inconsistent with your own crazy. Because either you have to say that rape does not harm children, which is too crazy for you, or admit that unlike your Tavistock argument, they do not actually stop stuff when it harms women more than men.
I never supported Truss.
Yes, you did. You were attacking Rishi as a WEF stooge, or whatever, when I said he was the least bad of the options, which he was.
The markets will collapse. The FTSE is propped up solely by the huge gains of oil and gas. It would be a huge mistake.
The only thing that matters is keeping the Red Wall.
"Feminists covered up mass rapes to retain power" isn't a good headline. They have to at least pretend that they care about the "women's issues" they claim to, not just the genocidal female supremacy agenda.
Sunak has done some good things already. Economic stability is important. I hope he doesn't go with the growing calls to windfall tax oil and gas profits.
But Impy, earlier you said that they base decisions on how much harm it does to men vs. women. Are you arguing that covering up Rotherham did more harm to men than women?
Agreed. Much better than that idiot Truss whom you were supporting in the first selection. Doesn't mean he will win though.
I hope he does, because right-wing populism is the only way to win. There is no other way.
I'm arguing that they don't actually care about rape unless they can use it as a bludgeon against men's existence. The cover-up allowed them to retain power and continue attacking men from that position.
I never supported Truss.
The markets will collapse. The FTSE is propped up solely by the huge gains of oil and gas. It would be a huge mistake.
Yeah, that's what makes your argument even inconsistent with your own crazy. Because either you have to say that rape does not harm children, which is too crazy for you, or admit that unlike your Tavistock argument, they do not actually stop stuff when it harms women more than men.
Yes, you did. You were attacking Rishi as a WEF stooge, or whatever, when I said he was the least bad of the options, which he was.
The only thing that matters is keeping the Red Wall.
My position is consistent.
Their calculation is :
How much damage can we do if we hold onto power vs how much can we stop if we report this?
In the end, the former won out and they started cobbling together a narrative that exonerated women in power, ready for the exposure.
It's not a coincidence that the places this happened were all represented by heavily misandrist female MPs.