Just a few days ago, you were preparing an attack on Sunak, claiming that he is a puppet because his wife is a... WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT... female of the opposite sex.
Now he suddenly got rid of women's influence?
A few months on now, you will turn on Sunak over something trivial, and you'll be calling him worse than De Pfeffer. I can guarantee it. He'll do some truly bad things as well, but you'll be mad over the trivial thing, cause that's just your style.
And while I haven't read any of David Irving's books, I hear they are not bad at all, and that he just comes to some retarded conclusions (three specifically).
MoushaRishi is as much in charge as Joe Biden. He was appointed and these measures are a distraction to appease the masses while they move behind the scenes.
Take "Justice for Women" to court to reveal their donors.
Is this because you think JK Rowling is one of their donors? You claimed that she would be happy if her son was murdered cause she hates men just so much. You're pretty crazy, aren't you?
Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure Sunak takes advice from literal crazy people who claim that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered.
The only thing you're right about is my gender... and that's because you've made both claims, so you're bound to be right either way.
You think he's going to come out and say that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered, like you did?
If not, is he complicit in the imprisonment of an innocent man who murdered a woman you say didn't exist and whose defense attorney just never made that argument, eh?
Was Boris a woman? I know it was hard to tell with that mop on his head, but yeah… he was no better than Liz and he was also a “Conservative”
Let’s hope this new guy is more than just posturing
Boris was a simp. "More feminine way" lmao. He's UK's Trudeau.
LOL!
Just a few days ago, you were preparing an attack on Sunak, claiming that he is a puppet because his wife is a... WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT... female of the opposite sex.
Now he suddenly got rid of women's influence?
A few months on now, you will turn on Sunak over something trivial, and you'll be calling him worse than De Pfeffer. I can guarantee it. He'll do some truly bad things as well, but you'll be mad over the trivial thing, cause that's just your style.
But that's hardly the reason for you to call someone a puppet (e.g. your love interest Carrie) - you just exercise your Proximate Woman Heuristic.
I wonder how many people realize that when you say 'the enemy', you don't mean feminists but THE WOMENS.
No, I'm arguing with you for credulously accepting bizarre nonsense.
It's like someone saying: "the holocaust didn't happen. That was outed by David Irving. Go argue with him."
And while I haven't read any of David Irving's books, I hear they are not bad at all, and that he just comes to some retarded conclusions (three specifically).
You cannot hide behind others who "said it too".
MoushaRishi is as much in charge as Joe Biden. He was appointed and these measures are a distraction to appease the masses while they move behind the scenes.
Is this because you think JK Rowling is one of their donors? You claimed that she would be happy if her son was murdered cause she hates men just so much. You're pretty crazy, aren't you?
Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure Sunak takes advice from literal crazy people who claim that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered.
The only thing you're right about is my gender... and that's because you've made both claims, so you're bound to be right either way.
You think he's going to come out and say that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered, like you did?
If not, is he complicit in the imprisonment of an innocent man who murdered a woman you say didn't exist and whose defense attorney just never made that argument, eh?
Are you under 18? Hard to believe an actual adult would spew such nonsense.