Just a few days ago, you were preparing an attack on Sunak, claiming that he is a puppet because his wife is a... WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT... female of the opposite sex.
Now he suddenly got rid of women's influence?
A few months on now, you will turn on Sunak over something trivial, and you'll be calling him worse than De Pfeffer. I can guarantee it. He'll do some truly bad things as well, but you'll be mad over the trivial thing, cause that's just your style.
LOL!
Just a few days ago, you were preparing an attack on Sunak, claiming that he is a puppet because his wife is a... WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT... female of the opposite sex.
Now he suddenly got rid of women's influence?
A few months on now, you will turn on Sunak over something trivial, and you'll be calling him worse than De Pfeffer. I can guarantee it. He'll do some truly bad things as well, but you'll be mad over the trivial thing, cause that's just your style.
But that's hardly the reason for you to call someone a puppet (e.g. your love interest Carrie) - you just exercise your Proximate Woman Heuristic.
I wonder how many people realize that when you say 'the enemy', you don't mean feminists but THE WOMENS.
No, I'm arguing with you for credulously accepting bizarre nonsense.
It's like someone saying: "the holocaust didn't happen. That was outed by David Irving. Go argue with him."