It's amazing what you can achieve when you get rid of women's influence.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (26)
sorted by:
LOL!
Just a few days ago, you were preparing an attack on Sunak, claiming that he is a puppet because his wife is a... WAIT FOR IT... WAIT FOR IT... female of the opposite sex.
Now he suddenly got rid of women's influence?
A few months on now, you will turn on Sunak over something trivial, and you'll be calling him worse than De Pfeffer. I can guarantee it. He'll do some truly bad things as well, but you'll be mad over the trivial thing, cause that's just your style.
She's also worth something like 100x more than him and the heir to India's largest company. She's hardly a nobody with no influence of her own.
If there are no speech laws, women failed to get their misogyny law over the line. For good.
I'll wait for actual hostility towards the enemy, but cutting out their next attack would be good.
But that's hardly the reason for you to call someone a puppet (e.g. your love interest Carrie) - you just exercise your Proximate Woman Heuristic.
I wonder how many people realize that when you say 'the enemy', you don't mean feminists but THE WOMENS.
Carrie was outed by members of Johnson's government. Go argue with them.
In the UK, is there even a difference?
No, I'm arguing with you for credulously accepting bizarre nonsense.
It's like someone saying: "the holocaust didn't happen. That was outed by David Irving. Go argue with him."