Take "Justice for Women" to court to reveal their donors.
Is this because you think JK Rowling is one of their donors? You claimed that she would be happy if her son was murdered cause she hates men just so much. You're pretty crazy, aren't you?
Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure Sunak takes advice from literal crazy people who claim that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered.
The only thing you're right about is my gender... and that's because you've made both claims, so you're bound to be right either way.
You think he's going to come out and say that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered, like you did?
If not, is he complicit in the imprisonment of an innocent man who murdered a woman you say didn't exist and whose defense attorney just never made that argument, eh?
Is this because you think JK Rowling is one of their donors? You claimed that she would be happy if her son was murdered cause she hates men just so much. You're pretty crazy, aren't you?
Yeah, I'm sorry, but I'm not sure Sunak takes advice from literal crazy people who claim that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered.
The only thing you're right about is my gender... and that's because you've made both claims, so you're bound to be right either way.
You think he's going to come out and say that Sarah Everhard didn't exist and that she deserved to be murdered, like you did?
If not, is he complicit in the imprisonment of an innocent man who murdered a woman you say didn't exist and whose defense attorney just never made that argument, eh?