Trudeau is killing 10k Canadians annually via euthanasia on a population of 38 million, including young children, the poor on welfare, veterans with PTSD and middle-aged adults in hospital "using lots of resources".
He keeps expanding the criteria, recently to children apparently without parental consent required.
Media reports in the last year of government workers offering unsolicited euthanasia to veterans seeking mental health services, welfare recipients unable to afford rent and chronically ill people but not terminal taking up space in hospital.
Used to think the "Death Panels" trope was just a boogeyman, but it's happening in real time now as actual socialist medical services get rationed ever further.
It's just a factual inevitability if you have a healthcare system outside the market. Limited resources have to be distributed one way or another. If the state controls healthcare outside of the market, then the only way to do this is using some system of distribution determined by the state. For dying persons who need limited resources, the only way the state can distribute them is either a lottery or death-panels. There are no other options.
Of course, if health care is market based, then simply the rich live and the poor die in such scenarios.
This poster has a single comment on September 29th, then nothing until today, where he/she/trollself posted five articles all aimed at dividing Finland and the US.
All indications are this account was created by the first forum slider smart enough to wait out the handshake period but dull enough to make their agenda extremely obvious.
Gonna have to start vetting every OP's comment history.
Considering all the calls for preventative gatekeeping that happen here, yeah sort of.
No idea what would work but at the very least comment participation could be required before handshakes can make threads. Would deal with all the recent "one and done" posts there has been recently by accounts with zero comments.
Last time something like that happened it was a someone ban evading from here with multiple alts and was too dumb to not user their main account when posting the exact same threads to multiple other boards.
Just judging by this headline and subheader, it seems that they compared death rates among the wealthiest and the poorest - and found that the poorest are more likely to die.
Which is then apparently attributed to inadequate health care.
If that is the standard, the comparable number for America is likely to be way worse, not better.
I can't find the OP article, but if both 'studies' are correct - it seems that the IOM specifically attributed those deaths to lack of health care, whereas the Finnish study just counted excess deaths.
That's the point. The left wants to decide who lives and who dies. Death panels are just another "conspiracy theory" that turned out to be true.
Worse, conspiracy theory that turned out to be PROJECTION.
Trudeau is killing 10k Canadians annually via euthanasia on a population of 38 million, including young children, the poor on welfare, veterans with PTSD and middle-aged adults in hospital "using lots of resources".
He keeps expanding the criteria, recently to children apparently without parental consent required.
Media reports in the last year of government workers offering unsolicited euthanasia to veterans seeking mental health services, welfare recipients unable to afford rent and chronically ill people but not terminal taking up space in hospital.
Used to think the "Death Panels" trope was just a boogeyman, but it's happening in real time now as actual socialist medical services get rationed ever further.
It's just a factual inevitability if you have a healthcare system outside the market. Limited resources have to be distributed one way or another. If the state controls healthcare outside of the market, then the only way to do this is using some system of distribution determined by the state. For dying persons who need limited resources, the only way the state can distribute them is either a lottery or death-panels. There are no other options.
Of course, if health care is market based, then simply the rich live and the poor die in such scenarios.
I wonder who they would choose to live.
Oh wait, we actually know.
https://communities.win/c/KotakuInAction2/p/13zMnZQk5A/when-is-the-nuremberg-trial-20-m/c
This poster has a single comment on September 29th, then nothing until today, where he/she/trollself posted five articles all aimed at dividing Finland and the US.
All indications are this account was created by the first forum slider smart enough to wait out the handshake period but dull enough to make their agenda extremely obvious.
The next iteration will be sneakier.
Gonna have to start vetting every OP's comment history.
Considering all the calls for preventative gatekeeping that happen here, yeah sort of.
No idea what would work but at the very least comment participation could be required before handshakes can make threads. Would deal with all the recent "one and done" posts there has been recently by accounts with zero comments.
Last time something like that happened it was a someone ban evading from here with multiple alts and was too dumb to not user their main account when posting the exact same threads to multiple other boards.
This is assuming that all Americans receive adequate care.
Just judging by this headline and subheader, it seems that they compared death rates among the wealthiest and the poorest - and found that the poorest are more likely to die.
Which is then apparently attributed to inadequate health care.
If that is the standard, the comparable number for America is likely to be way worse, not better.
I can't find the OP article, but if both 'studies' are correct - it seems that the IOM specifically attributed those deaths to lack of health care, whereas the Finnish study just counted excess deaths.
Interesting.
Now factor in medical bankruptcy.
Based Finland dealing with the muslim rape problem.
Ischemic heart disease is the #1 cause of death in both countries.
In Finland, about 10,000 people died from heart disease (2016), or (10,000 deaths / 5,497,713 population ) * 100 (percent) ~ 0.18%.
In the US, about 697,000 died from heart disease (2020), or (697,000 deaths / 331,002,2651 population) * 100 (percent) ~ 0.02%.
Finland's heart disease death rate is about 9x higher than the US'.
Finland: exists
Chukna: "And I took that personally"