Fuck off NYT.
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Archive Link
I don't know how they have the fucking nerve to print this, knowing that the politicians, the culture and the people they support are the reason for it.
Rightttt...don't pretend to care about us if you can't even admit they are deliberately restricting our opportunities out of pure spite.
Me: tl;dr, let me scroll to the bottom.
Naturally, the problem with men and boys is that they're not women! Amazing!
Is Trump in the room right now?
Fuck Hawley, he voted against drafting women.
They're fucking useless, so why bother? They'd just get a free paycheck while skipping out on most of the work.
Because it's a deterrent. Do you think that the feminist leader of the EU would be so eager to provoke war if it was her own people dying for it?
Yes, because if there's one thing women hate, it's younger, fitter women. Vanity is their favorite sin.
That doesn't follow. The majority of actions taken by these women have benefited young women the most.
Yeah, that's why a half of them are chomping down antidepressants like skittles and washing them down with box wine, you retarded sperg.
In a real “draft everyone!” Style wartime effort, the women would still stay at home and would be relegated to factory work or other non-combat roles anyway. Not like anyone, woke or otherwise, truly believes that a fighting force made of forcibly conscripted men and women in mixed companies would be even remotely efficacious in battle
It's not about effectiveness. It's not even about equality.
It's about putting the idea of thousands of dead women in the head of every jumped up little feminist who thinks a war and a draft would be a good way to reduce the male population. It's about linking their tough talk of being willing to fight to the last man back to harm of their own people. Nothing else will shut them up. They do not care about anything else.
It is absolutely essential that if we survive the Ukrainian farce they started, that we act quickly and decisively to make sure they cannot do anything without putting their own people in the firing line.
We are at war already, and I'm not talking about Ukraine.
"Many of you will die and that's a sacrifice we are willing to make" is not a sustainable position for how the world is run.
No, I am agreeing with you. That image is horrifying for most people to fathom, and is precisely why that would never occur.
Most men do not have the same level of…. Let’s go with disdain towards women as you do. And also, every man who has ever gotten into an engagement with a woman that has even been even remotely physical knows that they would easily overpower them. I understand your thought process, but things would need to change bigly for men to wholesale agree to sending the genetic future of their nation to potentially die (needlessly) in a war, rather than only half of that future (but I agree, it is sad that we as men are seen as expendable. I feel this ties deeply into duty and is a discussion for another time).
The last thing the military needs is more women in it.
Do you think women actually have some collective good will for eachother? Especially sociopathic globalist puppets. Really imp, you need to take a break from the internet for a bit. You've lost the plot.
Yes. They obviously do, even from an evolutionary perspective it makes sense that women work together.
Go outside and meet real humans.
Women make terrible soldiers.
And that was entirely by design
I'm guessing he doesn't mention the commensurate gains in cost of living that've occurred ever since women started working en masse.
This assertion is also a fallacy. Wages have stagnated starting in the 1970s.
Workers earn less today (adjusted to inflation) than they did back then.
Wage depression is the expected outcome of nearly doubling the work force, in addition to exporting virtually all of the US manufacturing to China.
It's almost like the "model family" doesn't actually work for men. It works for women.
Really, we should thank them for being so awful that we realized those chains.
I'm kidding, we definitely shouldn't, but in a way their lack of any positive feelings towards us helped us realize just how much the old system fucked us.
I don't know why they print shit like this. They don't give a fuck about men and boys, and everyone knows that feminism is the cause of the issues men and boys are having. We're the only ones who are talking about what it would take the solve the problem, and the solutions are nonstarters in this anti-male political environment.
I can answer. It's a combination of gaslighting, faking empathy to deflect criticism and trying to move the Overton window.
They know they are the problem, but they print this crap to make us believe it's "lack of ambition" like that just came from nowhere and not the hostile entity that controls our lives from the beginning of kindergarten.
The fake empathy provides a deflection if someone points out their many, many calls to discriminate against men.
They can move the Overton window away from hostility towards women by feigning caring.
The Slaves are walking out and refusing to take a shit deal and sacrifice for a society that hates them.
It is of course men's fault!
If Trump doesn't win, I hope Putin does. New York needs to be glassed.
Glass everyone in that fucking shithole.
Brooks