I've seen his speeches and such, and he's nothing special. He certainly isn't an amazing propagandist.
He's an actor, like Reagan. And he fits his speeches in such a way to appeal to every country. In France, he'll talk about the Bastille, in Germany about Valkyrie, in England about Magna Carta. It's disgusting, but it's effective for people who want to be deceived.
except he didn't persuade anyone of anything. All he does is rattles his cup. Whether people donate or not is based on their own internal politics, not based on anything he has ever said.
Our internal politics are: what does the Master want us to do? Yes, Master! Anything you want! Starve our people? Done! Make them freeze to death? Gladly, I despite them anyway! Sure, blow up our pipelines, Master.
lol @ the cope where you can't believe that anyone in the world is capable of anything on their own without the CIA being behind it. People like you give the CIA and US Govt far too much credit. If they were half as competent as you think they are, the entire world would be in the palm of America's hand.
They're not as competent as people think militarily, hence Afghanistan, but they sure as hell are absolute experts in the dark arts of propaganda. My God, they persuaded you, a sometime critic of the regime, that CRICKETS are actually a Russian superweapon from the 23th century. C'mon man, what is this?
Except he didn't play them, the media seized him and lifted him up on their shoulders. The media used him as their tool, their symbol, their saint.
And that's true too, but they could not have done it if he did not have at least some personal qualities.
Nope. Preparing defenses has never been a "casus belli"
The hell are you talking about man? World War I a reminder?
You don't seem to understand how irrelevant the concept of a "casus belli" is here. Putin committed to a naked invasion. Putin did not need to invoke any "casus belli"
Clearly he did need it, because poor morale and civilian opposition plagued the war, at least at the beginning. By no having a casus belli, he made it look like unprovoked aggression, even though it clearly wasn't.
Putin would not have attempted to invade earlier because he wasn't ready. Logistics are logistics.
I realize it may just be propaganda, but according to some analists, the ruskies were unprepared as it was.
Americans are very reliable when they point out that they have intel you are going to be invaded, and to prepare your defenses. It would be idiotic to discount that intel, and of course we were proven right.
Americans make stuff up to create conflict between people and wring it to their advantage. Not you, the regime.
This is 100% true and caused by a microwave weapon, likely Russian. Not sure why you are gaslighting this.
Incredible. This is even more absurd than your "it was actually Russia that bombed the Azov POWs".
That's quite a large invasion force considering that Ukraine's military forces were considerably smaller than that.
800,000 men spent at least some time terrorizing the Donbas. Had those 170,000 ever fought in a war?
LOL you are so weird in your methods and manner of copes. Here I am shitting on Zelensky, where I expected you to clap and say "well there, I see you can criticize your own side!" and you are instead telling me that the man is a generational genius. I guess this is similar to how the Germans coped in WW2 by citing to the "endless russian hordes".
You're certanly more sophisticated than the Zelensky hero-worshipers. I don't need a cope though, as I'm confident that your puppet will be overrun. You're losing to Iranian drones. IRANIAN drones.
My God, they persuaded you, a sometime critic of the regime, that CRICKETS are actually a Russian superweapon from the 23th century.
Crickets don't cause brain swelling. Microwave weapons do. The symptoms of microwave damage over time and the Havana syndrome symptoms are a perfect match. The USSR is known to have developed and tested such weapons during the Cold War. The "cricket noises" are a red herring, since microwave energy isn't going to show up in an audio recording, even though people getting brain damaged by it sometimes think they perceive sound as a side effect.
Nobody "convinced" me of this. I did my own research and read extensive articles, research, and analysis on the subject. The evidence is overwhelming, just like the "lab leak" thesis for COVID 19.
The fact that you shill hard on topics like this, and get defensive over them, make you look like you're playing for the other side.
The Chinese/Russians are lucky that I wasn't in charge when this was going on. I would have made it a top priority, gotten detectors set up, identified the vehicle doing the attacks, and strung the motherfuckers up.
Crickets don't cause brain swelling. Microwave weapons do.
It's psychosomatic. Obviously. Not a weapon from the 23rd century.
Nobody "convinced" me of this. I did my own research and read extensive articles, research, and analysis on the subject. The evidence is overwhelming, just like the "lab leak" thesis for COVID 19.
Did anyone write those articles, of did they drop like mana from heaven?
The fact that you shill hard on topics like this, and get defensive over them, make you look like you're playing for the other side.
I've been promoted again to FSB contractor! No buddy, no one's defensive, I'm just laughing at you for being fooled by something so transparently idiotic.
The Chinese/Russians are lucky that I wasn't in charge when this was going on. I would have made it a top priority, gotten detectors set up, identified the vehicle doing the attacks, and strung the motherfuckers up.
No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage. To be clear, there are probably only a few dozen genuine cases out of hundreds of complaints. There are many more hypochondriacs who were not targeted/affected who muddied the waters and had their symptoms explains by other factors.
Not a weapon from the 23rd century.
There is nothing high tech or sci fi about using microwaves as a weapon. Russia experimented with such weapons during the Cold War. The fact that the human brain absorbs microwaves and can be affected/damaged by them was known and studied early in the Cold War.
Did anyone write those articles, of did they drop like mana from heaven?
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand? Nobody can do that. People absorb information, form conclusions, and move on. I do not open up a legal research file and document everything like I'd do for a legal brief. I linked the wiki which explains some of the bigger studies done.
I've been promoted again to FSB contractor!
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push. They line up too neatly to avoid suspicion. However, the fact that there is a chance doesn't mean it is a certainty. The world is not black and white. You MIGHT be a contractor for any number of organizations, or you might just do it for free out of misguided ideology. The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
Good like stringing up crickets.
Again, crickets don't cause brain damage. It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged with symptoms perfectly consistent with pulsed microwave radiation exposure. It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage.
Isn't that just the product of being an American? What will happen if you just pick a few hundred people at random and check them for brian damage?
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand?
I wasn't asking you to produce your source. I was commenting on the fact that you asserted that "no one" propagandized you. Someone wrote those articles. Apparently, you at least now no longer know who they are, and are thus not able to provide an assessment of their credibility.
I linked the wiki
Don't do that. Wikipedia is propaganda.
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push.
LOL! Do you know how crazy you sound? Particularly since you're constantly switching your views: first you said I'm an FSB agent, then you said you no longer believed it, and now you're back.
The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
What is the 'party line'? And how come your views always line up with those of the CIA?
It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged
I don't believe a thing the Americans say. Moreover, post hoc ergo propter hoc is not exactly an impressive argument.
It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
The Russians are way too cowardly to hit back at the EOL. (SEE, HE CRITICIZED THE RUSSIANS TO TRY TO PROVE THAT HE IS NOT AN FSB AGENT!)
He's an actor, like Reagan. And he fits his speeches in such a way to appeal to every country. In France, he'll talk about the Bastille, in Germany about Valkyrie, in England about Magna Carta. It's disgusting, but it's effective for people who want to be deceived.
Our internal politics are: what does the Master want us to do? Yes, Master! Anything you want! Starve our people? Done! Make them freeze to death? Gladly, I despite them anyway! Sure, blow up our pipelines, Master.
They're not as competent as people think militarily, hence Afghanistan, but they sure as hell are absolute experts in the dark arts of propaganda. My God, they persuaded you, a sometime critic of the regime, that CRICKETS are actually a Russian superweapon from the 23th century. C'mon man, what is this?
And that's true too, but they could not have done it if he did not have at least some personal qualities.
The hell are you talking about man? World War I a reminder?
Clearly he did need it, because poor morale and civilian opposition plagued the war, at least at the beginning. By no having a casus belli, he made it look like unprovoked aggression, even though it clearly wasn't.
I realize it may just be propaganda, but according to some analists, the ruskies were unprepared as it was.
Americans make stuff up to create conflict between people and wring it to their advantage. Not you, the regime.
Incredible. This is even more absurd than your "it was actually Russia that bombed the Azov POWs".
800,000 men spent at least some time terrorizing the Donbas. Had those 170,000 ever fought in a war?
You're certanly more sophisticated than the Zelensky hero-worshipers. I don't need a cope though, as I'm confident that your puppet will be overrun. You're losing to Iranian drones. IRANIAN drones.
Crickets don't cause brain swelling. Microwave weapons do. The symptoms of microwave damage over time and the Havana syndrome symptoms are a perfect match. The USSR is known to have developed and tested such weapons during the Cold War. The "cricket noises" are a red herring, since microwave energy isn't going to show up in an audio recording, even though people getting brain damaged by it sometimes think they perceive sound as a side effect.
Nobody "convinced" me of this. I did my own research and read extensive articles, research, and analysis on the subject. The evidence is overwhelming, just like the "lab leak" thesis for COVID 19.
The fact that you shill hard on topics like this, and get defensive over them, make you look like you're playing for the other side.
The Chinese/Russians are lucky that I wasn't in charge when this was going on. I would have made it a top priority, gotten detectors set up, identified the vehicle doing the attacks, and strung the motherfuckers up.
It's psychosomatic. Obviously. Not a weapon from the 23rd century.
Did anyone write those articles, of did they drop like mana from heaven?
I've been promoted again to FSB contractor! No buddy, no one's defensive, I'm just laughing at you for being fooled by something so transparently idiotic.
Good like stringing up crickets.
No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage. To be clear, there are probably only a few dozen genuine cases out of hundreds of complaints. There are many more hypochondriacs who were not targeted/affected who muddied the waters and had their symptoms explains by other factors.
There is nothing high tech or sci fi about using microwaves as a weapon. Russia experimented with such weapons during the Cold War. The fact that the human brain absorbs microwaves and can be affected/damaged by them was known and studied early in the Cold War.
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand? Nobody can do that. People absorb information, form conclusions, and move on. I do not open up a legal research file and document everything like I'd do for a legal brief. I linked the wiki which explains some of the bigger studies done.
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push. They line up too neatly to avoid suspicion. However, the fact that there is a chance doesn't mean it is a certainty. The world is not black and white. You MIGHT be a contractor for any number of organizations, or you might just do it for free out of misguided ideology. The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
Again, crickets don't cause brain damage. It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged with symptoms perfectly consistent with pulsed microwave radiation exposure. It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
Isn't that just the product of being an American? What will happen if you just pick a few hundred people at random and check them for brian damage?
I wasn't asking you to produce your source. I was commenting on the fact that you asserted that "no one" propagandized you. Someone wrote those articles. Apparently, you at least now no longer know who they are, and are thus not able to provide an assessment of their credibility.
Don't do that. Wikipedia is propaganda.
LOL! Do you know how crazy you sound? Particularly since you're constantly switching your views: first you said I'm an FSB agent, then you said you no longer believed it, and now you're back.
What is the 'party line'? And how come your views always line up with those of the CIA?
I don't believe a thing the Americans say. Moreover, post hoc ergo propter hoc is not exactly an impressive argument.
The Russians are way too cowardly to hit back at the EOL. (SEE, HE CRITICIZED THE RUSSIANS TO TRY TO PROVE THAT HE IS NOT AN FSB AGENT!)