No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage.

Isn't that just the product of being an American? What will happen if you just pick a few hundred people at random and check them for brian damage?

Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand?

I wasn't asking you to produce your source. I was commenting on the fact that you asserted that "no one" propagandized you. Someone wrote those articles. Apparently, you at least now no longer know who they are, and are thus not able to provide an assessment of their credibility.

I linked the wiki

Don't do that. Wikipedia is propaganda.

I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push.

LOL! Do you know how crazy you sound? Particularly since you're constantly switching your views: first you said I'm an FSB agent, then you said you no longer believed it, and now you're back.

The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.

What is the 'party line'? And how come your views always line up with those of the CIA?

It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged

I don't believe a thing the Americans say. Moreover, post hoc ergo propter hoc is not exactly an impressive argument.

It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.

The Russians are way too cowardly to hit back at the EOL. (SEE, HE CRITICIZED THE RUSSIANS TO TRY TO PROVE THAT HE IS NOT AN FSB AGENT!)