No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage. To be clear, there are probably only a few dozen genuine cases out of hundreds of complaints. There are many more hypochondriacs who were not targeted/affected who muddied the waters and had their symptoms explains by other factors.
Not a weapon from the 23rd century.
There is nothing high tech or sci fi about using microwaves as a weapon. Russia experimented with such weapons during the Cold War. The fact that the human brain absorbs microwaves and can be affected/damaged by them was known and studied early in the Cold War.
Did anyone write those articles, of did they drop like mana from heaven?
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand? Nobody can do that. People absorb information, form conclusions, and move on. I do not open up a legal research file and document everything like I'd do for a legal brief. I linked the wiki which explains some of the bigger studies done.
I've been promoted again to FSB contractor!
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push. They line up too neatly to avoid suspicion. However, the fact that there is a chance doesn't mean it is a certainty. The world is not black and white. You MIGHT be a contractor for any number of organizations, or you might just do it for free out of misguided ideology. The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
Good like stringing up crickets.
Again, crickets don't cause brain damage. It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged with symptoms perfectly consistent with pulsed microwave radiation exposure. It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage.
Isn't that just the product of being an American? What will happen if you just pick a few hundred people at random and check them for brian damage?
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand?
I wasn't asking you to produce your source. I was commenting on the fact that you asserted that "no one" propagandized you. Someone wrote those articles. Apparently, you at least now no longer know who they are, and are thus not able to provide an assessment of their credibility.
I linked the wiki
Don't do that. Wikipedia is propaganda.
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push.
LOL! Do you know how crazy you sound? Particularly since you're constantly switching your views: first you said I'm an FSB agent, then you said you no longer believed it, and now you're back.
The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
What is the 'party line'? And how come your views always line up with those of the CIA?
It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged
I don't believe a thing the Americans say. Moreover, post hoc ergo propter hoc is not exactly an impressive argument.
It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
The Russians are way too cowardly to hit back at the EOL. (SEE, HE CRITICIZED THE RUSSIANS TO TRY TO PROVE THAT HE IS NOT AN FSB AGENT!)
No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage. To be clear, there are probably only a few dozen genuine cases out of hundreds of complaints. There are many more hypochondriacs who were not targeted/affected who muddied the waters and had their symptoms explains by other factors.
There is nothing high tech or sci fi about using microwaves as a weapon. Russia experimented with such weapons during the Cold War. The fact that the human brain absorbs microwaves and can be affected/damaged by them was known and studied early in the Cold War.
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand? Nobody can do that. People absorb information, form conclusions, and move on. I do not open up a legal research file and document everything like I'd do for a legal brief. I linked the wiki which explains some of the bigger studies done.
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push. They line up too neatly to avoid suspicion. However, the fact that there is a chance doesn't mean it is a certainty. The world is not black and white. You MIGHT be a contractor for any number of organizations, or you might just do it for free out of misguided ideology. The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
Again, crickets don't cause brain damage. It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged with symptoms perfectly consistent with pulsed microwave radiation exposure. It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
Isn't that just the product of being an American? What will happen if you just pick a few hundred people at random and check them for brian damage?
I wasn't asking you to produce your source. I was commenting on the fact that you asserted that "no one" propagandized you. Someone wrote those articles. Apparently, you at least now no longer know who they are, and are thus not able to provide an assessment of their credibility.
Don't do that. Wikipedia is propaganda.
LOL! Do you know how crazy you sound? Particularly since you're constantly switching your views: first you said I'm an FSB agent, then you said you no longer believed it, and now you're back.
What is the 'party line'? And how come your views always line up with those of the CIA?
I don't believe a thing the Americans say. Moreover, post hoc ergo propter hoc is not exactly an impressive argument.
The Russians are way too cowardly to hit back at the EOL. (SEE, HE CRITICIZED THE RUSSIANS TO TRY TO PROVE THAT HE IS NOT AN FSB AGENT!)