"Mommy Von Der Leyen, I've been such a good boy, can I have nuclear war for Christmas?"
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Crickets don't cause brain swelling. Microwave weapons do. The symptoms of microwave damage over time and the Havana syndrome symptoms are a perfect match. The USSR is known to have developed and tested such weapons during the Cold War. The "cricket noises" are a red herring, since microwave energy isn't going to show up in an audio recording, even though people getting brain damaged by it sometimes think they perceive sound as a side effect.
Nobody "convinced" me of this. I did my own research and read extensive articles, research, and analysis on the subject. The evidence is overwhelming, just like the "lab leak" thesis for COVID 19.
The fact that you shill hard on topics like this, and get defensive over them, make you look like you're playing for the other side.
The Chinese/Russians are lucky that I wasn't in charge when this was going on. I would have made it a top priority, gotten detectors set up, identified the vehicle doing the attacks, and strung the motherfuckers up.
It's psychosomatic. Obviously. Not a weapon from the 23rd century.
Did anyone write those articles, of did they drop like mana from heaven?
I've been promoted again to FSB contractor! No buddy, no one's defensive, I'm just laughing at you for being fooled by something so transparently idiotic.
Good like stringing up crickets.
No, there were brain scans done showing genuine brain damage. To be clear, there are probably only a few dozen genuine cases out of hundreds of complaints. There are many more hypochondriacs who were not targeted/affected who muddied the waters and had their symptoms explains by other factors.
There is nothing high tech or sci fi about using microwaves as a weapon. Russia experimented with such weapons during the Cold War. The fact that the human brain absorbs microwaves and can be affected/damaged by them was known and studied early in the Cold War.
Do you think I have total recall and the ability to recall exactly what I read going back years, and to reproduce the totality of my sources on demand? Nobody can do that. People absorb information, form conclusions, and move on. I do not open up a legal research file and document everything like I'd do for a legal brief. I linked the wiki which explains some of the bigger studies done.
I do believe there is a non-zero chance that you work as a contractor for someone with a vested interest in pushing the views you push. They line up too neatly to avoid suspicion. However, the fact that there is a chance doesn't mean it is a certainty. The world is not black and white. You MIGHT be a contractor for any number of organizations, or you might just do it for free out of misguided ideology. The problem with seeing you as independent is that you would not "toe the party line" so consistently.
Again, crickets don't cause brain damage. It is undeniable that a few dozen people were legitimately brain damaged with symptoms perfectly consistent with pulsed microwave radiation exposure. It would have been relatively easy for someone in a vehicle nearby to point an emitter at a State Dept building for a while to fuck with people.
Isn't that just the product of being an American? What will happen if you just pick a few hundred people at random and check them for brian damage?
I wasn't asking you to produce your source. I was commenting on the fact that you asserted that "no one" propagandized you. Someone wrote those articles. Apparently, you at least now no longer know who they are, and are thus not able to provide an assessment of their credibility.
Don't do that. Wikipedia is propaganda.
LOL! Do you know how crazy you sound? Particularly since you're constantly switching your views: first you said I'm an FSB agent, then you said you no longer believed it, and now you're back.
What is the 'party line'? And how come your views always line up with those of the CIA?
I don't believe a thing the Americans say. Moreover, post hoc ergo propter hoc is not exactly an impressive argument.
The Russians are way too cowardly to hit back at the EOL. (SEE, HE CRITICIZED THE RUSSIANS TO TRY TO PROVE THAT HE IS NOT AN FSB AGENT!)