I was wondering if there was anything regarding the estimated size of the regressive left vs all of their enemies as that would be useful for putting pressure on said leftist extremists by pressuring other groups that hate them into merging with the right wing populists.
I am sick of all these factions in the dissident right and general opposition to the regressive left fighting each other, and think they should all just make concessions with the right wing populists and merge into them.
Note: I am not saying that right wing populists should make concessions, but rather other groups should be making concessions with them.
~ 8% vs. ~ 2%.
Vast majority agrees with the 2% (i.e., us), but is too passive. Problem is also that they are in control of all institutions of consensus creation. So they can manufacture consent all they want.
The lib elite control every single strategic lever of power, including academia, the media, entertainment, and the government bureaucracy.
They have developed methods to manipulate and control the stupid masses, and hones these methods for decades while the Right basically sat back fat and complacent because the hammer hadn't dropped yet.
It's going to be a generational struggle to contest the lib control of these strongpoints.
Ah, 17 year ago, when naive right-wingers thought that unlimited money in politics would help them.
And now look at them.
Actually, I'd say that gun control opponents also punch above their weight, since they care so much more about the issue. I hesitate to rely on polls, but stuff like 'universal background checks' polls well.
The right's main problem is that they are extremely hierarchical. As long as there is no clear leader, there will always be pointless in-fighting as people instinctively struggle for dominance, whether they intend to be doing so or not. Once that leader emerges though, everyone quickly falls in line and starts pushing together, as Trump proved.
That's not a right-wing problem: it's just human nature. Relative to the tankies and the globalists, we are actually not very hierarchical. Yes there's infighting between ideological factions and leaders, but the right is also prone to frequent regicide, justified or not, when their leaders disappoint. We do a much better job of that than our enemies do, however ineffective it might make us as a political group. But everyone on the left is marching to the tune of the same billionaire class, whether they know it or not, and have been for decades. And their leadership enforces its hold on power much more efficiently than any right-wing leader ever could.
What I wrote here is TL;DR, but I am going to discuss the subject of factions among enemies of the regressive left.
The 2 main groups that oppose the regressive left are the dissident right and the gendercrit sphere, with smaller groups including ACTUAL libertarian leftists, the incel community, and neo-Nazis/white supremacists.
The dissident right can be further split into several groups such as the libertarian right, paleoconservatives, Kahanist type Jews, the manosphere, and right wing populists.
While the gender criticals tend to get along perfectly with the femcels and are thus considered part of the same group, the dissident right, libertarian left, and other anti-regressive factions do not get along with them as they are considered sexist towards men. Views regarding obscene materials such as pornography tend to vary in the GC sphere despite the anti-porn feminists dominating them due to being pushed into said sphere by regressive leftists who want to deregulate sex work. When GC types hate porn they also love to use offensive fetishistic crap as an excuse to promote sexism against men.
Dissident right factions often do not get along with each other for the following reasons:
Right wing populists tend to want more aggressive solutions to the regressive left that involve outright banning and persecuting them, are more economically lose, push what is considered not to be hate speech to the limit, and often vary wildly on matters related to obscene materials.
The libertarian right tends to be absolutists when it comes to free speech, which causes conflicts with more censorious/aggressive groups.
Paleocons say they support free speech but are involved in various tradcon censorship controversies regarding material they happen to hate.
The manosphere has it's own conflicts and varies in regards to various topics among different factions with some caring and some not.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but While the Kahanist types happily recognise severe regressive leftist corruption in the Jewish community I do not know how they handle discussions of issues regarding genetic problems and similar topics that right wing populists may bring up.
Pretty much everyone hates the incel community with the gender crits using them as an excuse to promote sexism like what the regressive left does, and the dissident right and neo-Nazis/white supremacists considering them to be spergs and lolcows; they are well aware of this.
Nobody gets along with actual neo-nazis/white supremacists, and the only group on the dissident right that is willing to speak with them are right wing populists, who frequently debate with them on ideas such as nature vs culture. Neo-Nazis and white supremacists also have a divide in regards to Nazism itself and whether Hitler was a shitty leader. While a ton of them hate things such as porn because of the degeneracy that revolves around it and consider it a plot, I think several of them do not care.
The libertarian left itself is pretty much dead at this point as the more rational people ended up getting assimilated into the dissident right due to exposure to new ideas regarding economics, abortion, and environmental crap, while people who refuse to adapt to new information either go regressive or become lolcows.
Right-wing populists/MAGAs/Deplorables/the silent majority or whatever you want to call them are a yuge group, a natural fit with right/Libertarians, itself a growing faction with the reform of the LP.
Candidates vetted and advanced by a coalition between the MAGA majority and Right Libertarians could do some serious reforming.
P.S.
MAGA Majority
would make a good hat slogan.
That's an interesting write up of the whole situation, especially wrt to the dissident right. I'm one of the sane refugees from the libertarian left, but it's not totally obvious which dissident right faction I'd be in now. I suppose the manosphere (more specifically MGTOW informed by TRP) is the best fit with plenty of right wing populism thrown in. In my heart I want to be a right wing libertarian, but in my head I know that right wing populism is necessary since there's no prize for being the most principled corpse in the mass grave. We need to be willing to turn the left's dirty tricks against them. As for the Nazis, we're not exactly spoiled for choice when it comes to allies in the fight against the cultural rot that's infesting our society. At least the Nazis understand the need to deal with the degeneracy that's infecting everything. A bonus is that they realize both the magnitude of the tranny problem and the extreme measures that are needed to solve it. They would be more reliable allies against the trannies than the TERFs as well. So I don't think purging them the way commies purge us is the way to go.
Dealing with ghetto culture and regressive leftist corruption would make assimilating the "Nazis" easier.
I think the psycho left is much smaller than it seems but with the MSM and government blasting and supporting an agenda, and stealing elections, it makes it look like it is larger.
But what the NWO has been doing is working and the country is done. Too many useful idiots that get caught up in myopic, singular, carrot-on-a-stick issues the NWO dangles in front of them, and they can't see the forest for the trees.
So many are going to be wailing in the near future... "I just don't understand how we got here."
The true believers on the left aren't the whole problem. It's the proles. The useless eaters, the non contributors and the illegals/criminals.
Those are your enemy every bit as much as the "regressive left". And they make up about forty percent of the population.
It's only a violent subset of the regressive left, but Andy Ngo estimates that there are only 800 official/fully committed antifa members nationwide in the US, which surprised me.
He seemed to imply there are very few actual antifa members, but they have very effective tactics at raising armies of sycophants wherever they are needed.
Leftists have always been good at making the 10% appear as 90% and 10% appear as 90%. It doesn't matter though, popular will is entirely irrelevant. Their small size is a benefit, because tight minority organization is the only thing that matters when trying to take power
They honestly had more clout to claim that bullshit back then before a spanner got thrown into the works with the exposure of the regressive left, though in America it may have been 50/50 due to all the paleocons.
Now add to that the US Department of Defense...
The Hidden Tribes report says 8% of Americans are progressive activists (aka the regressive left). If we're defining their enemies as devoted conservatives, regressives do actually outnumber them by 2%.
Post Reported for: Max Posts.
For the moment, I'm not going to remove this posts, because I don't see you normally violating this rule. Please try to keep it at 5 a day so we don't spam the feed.