This shit is why the left wants to legalize pedophilia: because their precious LGBT are knee-deep in it.
the gay movement has lost touch with its past … It was founded to a large extent by men who were attracted to adolescent boys in Germany in the beginning of the 20th century
Literal Weimar degeneracy.
I said that teenage boys aren’t children, but are in fact sexual
And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler into power.
So long as drawn or animated, don't care I'll just not watch/read it.
But as soon as you try saying "well if you like these drawings you should like the real childr.." I'm immediately getting the napalm as all you are is an individual that wants to look for any excuse or position to justify your want to abuse others.
Yeah then it falls into the old video game complaint "Why are you showing my kids this stuff?!" well they're not supposed to be seeing it, if you did your job parenting you can teach them that.
The drawings encourage degenerates in their desire to molest children. I've literally posted studies here multiple times showing the direct link between deviant sexual arousal and child molestation yet retards on here keep defending the people who watch it as being functional and totally not pedophiles
I'd probably argue schools encouraging prepubescent kids to talk about masturbation and setting up 'sexy summer camp' is a bigger threat to kids than drawings and animation. My list of priorities to defend kids is the following:
1.Healthcare
2.Education
3.Police
4.social services
5.political elites
6.illegal immigration (lack of action on this really helped child trafficking)
7. Media and social media
That's the order, of course if you see a child getting groomed and you can prevent it, for gods sake do it but drawings are last when they are already moving to sterilise the innocent children.
You can condemn all of those. Wtf is this idea that you can only decry one set of pedophiles/degenerates but not the other.
Why the fuck is it necessary to pretend that these people are not pedophiles? Do you think you're going to form some unholy alliance with pieces of shit who jerk to loli?
i got fucking nauseous reading just snippits of this degenerate's thoughts summarized in this news article. It speaks volumes about the 2-3 peers and the editor who were reviewing this piece that they gave it a tick and didn't just call the cops after the abstract.
No, I was being completely serious. Until I read this:
Andersson came under widespread scrutiny earlier this week after it was revealed he had written an academic article in which he admitted to masturbating to fantasy child sexual abuse material for three months as part of his “research.”
What kind of "research" is that!? And since he is a PhD student, that means he got paid to wank over hentai and then write about it. And not even ordinary hentai.
Peer review might also be useful for detecting errors or fraud. At the BMJ we did several studies where we inserted major errors into papers that we then sent to many reviewers.3,4 Nobody ever spotted all of the errors. Some reviewers did not spot any, and most reviewers spotted only about a quarter. Peer review sometimes picks up fraud by chance, but generally it is not a reliable method for detecting fraud
People have a great many fantasies about peer review, and one of the most powerful is that it is a highly objective, reliable, and consistent process. I regularly received letters from authors who were upset that the BMJ rejected their paper and then published what they thought to be a much inferior paper on the same subject. Always they saw something underhand. They found it hard to accept that peer review is a subjective and, therefore, inconsistent process.
The most famous piece of evidence on bias against authors comes from a study by DP Peters and SJ Ceci.6 They took 12 studies that came from prestigious institutions that had already been published in psychology journals. They retyped the papers, made minor changes to the titles, abstracts, and introductions but changed the authors' names and institutions. They invented institutions with names like the Tri-Valley Center for Human Potential. The papers were then resubmitted to the journals that had first published them. In only three cases did the journals realize that they had already published the paper, and eight of the remaining nine were rejected—not because of lack of originality but because of poor quality.
If "peer review" cannot detect fraud, error, or wholesale plagiarism of an article already published in the same journal, why should we lend it any credence at all?
This is not the first or even the most thorough 'review' of what is called the peer review process, but it is the most accessible to the layman.
Describing one such masturbation “session”, Anderson wrote in his notebook in September of last year: “Started reading on the toilet: Boy who is staying with relatives happens to see his same-age friend masturbate… The boy who has admitted to everything has nothing to lose, so he throws himself over Tokio-kun and starts sniffing his cock and licking his smooth balls, and while waiting for the shot I came!”
Man, as someone who defends loli/shota on the grounds of free speech, I fucking loathe this man.
That is not research. That is a wank diary.
Research would be trying to find out how many consumer of loli/shota art/comics also pursued real photo and video content, or heaven forbid, physcial contact with children.
Research would be trying to find an answer to the simple question of 'how likely is it that someone who looks at this artwork is a danger to children?' That is research.
Whether or not you can nut over it is not research. I could nut over picture of a wooden chair if I wanted to.
Totally not surprised this dude is into the real thing.
You consistently declare that people using it aren't pedophile.
I would definitely never say anything so ridiculous as 'there aren't any pedophiles looking at this'. Of course some of the people looking at it are going to be pedophiles.
Many more, I suspect, will be remembering their past selves and their crush on their teacher. You would call someone a pedophile if they are imagining their past self as the cartoon boy? What are you accusing them of? Psychic time-travel rape of themselves? Absurd!
This is to say nothing of those who simply don't view cartoon characters as human. ...Which they aren't.
This shit is why the left wants to legalize pedophilia: because their precious LGBT are knee-deep in it.
Literal Weimar degeneracy.
And then one day, for no reason at all, people voted Hitler into power.
I’m old enough to remember when Milo said it and it was a bad thing
At the same time George Takei said the same thing too
So long as drawn or animated, don't care I'll just not watch/read it.
But as soon as you try saying "well if you like these drawings you should like the real childr.." I'm immediately getting the napalm as all you are is an individual that wants to look for any excuse or position to justify your want to abuse others.
Plus the anime sjw hates so much and obviously hentai was never promoted to kids. Its for 16+ and young adults.
While groomer shit is.
Yeah then it falls into the old video game complaint "Why are you showing my kids this stuff?!" well they're not supposed to be seeing it, if you did your job parenting you can teach them that.
Yep. I could not give less of a shit about fiction.
But as soon someone tries to pull that shit into the real world, I'm basically ok with summary execution.
Yep fiction, don't care, you could draw Cuthulu raping a school girl for all I care
But the second you try to abuse the trust, autonomy and freedom of another for your own selfish desire, the woodchipper feet first.
The drawings encourage degenerates in their desire to molest children. I've literally posted studies here multiple times showing the direct link between deviant sexual arousal and child molestation yet retards on here keep defending the people who watch it as being functional and totally not pedophiles
I'd probably argue schools encouraging prepubescent kids to talk about masturbation and setting up 'sexy summer camp' is a bigger threat to kids than drawings and animation. My list of priorities to defend kids is the following:
1.Healthcare 2.Education 3.Police 4.social services 5.political elites 6.illegal immigration (lack of action on this really helped child trafficking) 7. Media and social media
That's the order, of course if you see a child getting groomed and you can prevent it, for gods sake do it but drawings are last when they are already moving to sterilise the innocent children.
You can condemn all of those. Wtf is this idea that you can only decry one set of pedophiles/degenerates but not the other.
Why the fuck is it necessary to pretend that these people are not pedophiles? Do you think you're going to form some unholy alliance with pieces of shit who jerk to loli?
A non-zero number of those drawings are made using real CP as references.
Exactly, the existence of people like him encourage the wasting of police resources in the name of scorched earth tactics.
Dude anyone who likes the drawings is 99% likely to like real children
A lot of academics were also defending him. I archved several today.
Academics means fucking nothing, nowadays. It's nothing but a bunch of midwits agreeing with each other because they have an expensive piece of paper.
Yup, that's pretty much how I expect him to look.
Seriously, he looks like a fucking soyjack.
leftism is nothing but excuses for child rape.
The article he wrote was peer reviewed so I don't see what the issue is? I didn't realize that everyone here was anti-science.
i got fucking nauseous reading just snippits of this degenerate's thoughts summarized in this news article. It speaks volumes about the 2-3 peers and the editor who were reviewing this piece that they gave it a tick and didn't just call the cops after the abstract.
This is sarcasm right?
No, I was being completely serious. Until I read this:
What kind of "research" is that!? And since he is a PhD student, that means he got paid to wank over hentai and then write about it. And not even ordinary hentai.
So typical ScIeNcE then.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/
If "peer review" cannot detect fraud, error, or wholesale plagiarism of an article already published in the same journal, why should we lend it any credence at all?
This is not the first or even the most thorough 'review' of what is called the peer review process, but it is the most accessible to the layman.
"Peer review" should be by AI only, when they've finally developed the technology.
I should also mention the shotacon paper got the guy in trouble with the British government because he openly admitted to violating the UK lolisho ban.
Man, as someone who defends loli/shota on the grounds of free speech, I fucking loathe this man.
That is not research. That is a wank diary.
Research would be trying to find out how many consumer of loli/shota art/comics also pursued real photo and video content, or heaven forbid, physcial contact with children.
Research would be trying to find an answer to the simple question of 'how likely is it that someone who looks at this artwork is a danger to children?' That is research.
Whether or not you can nut over it is not research. I could nut over picture of a wooden chair if I wanted to.
Totally not surprised this dude is into the real thing.
You go well beyond defending it as speech. You consistently declare that people using it aren't pedophile. These are the people you're enabling
I would definitely never say anything so ridiculous as 'there aren't any pedophiles looking at this'. Of course some of the people looking at it are going to be pedophiles.
Many more, I suspect, will be remembering their past selves and their crush on their teacher. You would call someone a pedophile if they are imagining their past self as the cartoon boy? What are you accusing them of? Psychic time-travel rape of themselves? Absurd!
This is to say nothing of those who simply don't view cartoon characters as human. ...Which they aren't.
Wow it's almost like people into that shit tend to be pedophiles