Gaetz Was Right
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Only problem is it should pass through (4,4) and (10,10) not (4,1) and (4,10). You don't go below X=Y; that's the rule and this graph doesn't reflect that.
Not pictured: The graph starts at (-3,1).
Plenty of graphs go below X=Y, allowing for negative numbers. The graph for y=-3x^2 goes below X=Y, and that's a basic math equation.
I meant you don't date women who are crazier than they are hot.
https://youtu.be/bbpGkrViOcE
You know that video's old because people still thought trannies weren't crazy. Got some priors updated real quick there.
Is there a way to combine this with augmented reality so that we can have a Watch Dogs setup just for identifying crazy women?
Graph has a flipped x and y axis.
Definitely true. Hotness is a variable that can change, but craziness is a constant.
I dunno man, sometimes they get better at the craziness with experience :^)