One conclusion I recently came to is that it would be beneficial for a society to be opposed to homosexual sex and anal sex in general. A traditional taboo against homosexuality likely served beneficial purposes.
AIDS almost never spreads to men through vaginal sex. This means that the entirety of the sexual spread outside of the homosexual male population was caused by bisexual men who fucked around in the gay pool and brought it back to the hetero pop. Yes, there was spread through needles as well, but this would be irrelevant for societies that didn't have drugs (traditional taboos).
Combine this with the extreme amount of different sexual partners many homosexual men will have, and you have an explosion of STDs which spread to the full population thanks to bisexual men. Some STDs may be deadly or cause infertility. Thus, there's an evolutionary incentive for a society to be opposed to male homosexuality, at least beyond a monogamous relationship (rare for the gays).
A possible corollary is that societies shouldn't have nearly as strong a taboo against female homosexuality as male homosexuality, as this disease spreading aspect doesn't exist there, although women not breeding is obviously bad for a society so such a taboo might still exist.
it would be beneficial for a society to be opposed to homosexual sex and anal sex in general
The correct balance is what we had before the "sexual revolution".
Criminalize sodomy, homosexuality treated as the mental illness it is, severe social stigma against fornication, frowning on any public discourse around sex. Obscenity charged against any publication that breaks these norms.
Chastity is praised publicly and expressions of lust are shamed.
Complete prohibition of any use of public funding or other resources for 'research' into sexual 'psychology' or 'attitudes' (really all 'social science' needs to be treated like the subversive quackery it is).
Thats the thing. People interpret the reasons why some laws exist about as well as they interpret scripture, or the greeks. Of course no one expects sodomy laws to eliminate homosexuality or depravity. They exist to establish a precedent set by the cultural standards of the community.
Every faggot on earth knows that what they do is against nature. Thats why they invest so much in ‘pride’ and ‘discrimination’ efforts. They couldn’t function for long with the cognitive dissonance without offing or exiling themselves if they can’t point to some external justification for their abject depravity.
Two men shoving their cocks in each others assholes and mouths. Look at it for what it is. These are boys that upon learning the nature of men and the world knew that they couldn’t compete — but rather than foregoing a mate that they couldn’t win or fulfill and adjusting to reality, instead chose utter depravity as the winning solution to their neuroticisms.
I’ve lost all sympathy at this point. Every homosexual I’ve ever known, and there’s been an over representation in my life compared to many, has never been anything close to normal on so many levels.
Sure, they may caricaturize aspects of ‘Trad’ life but its always with a smirk of disdain — example: Brunch. Watch how fags have brunch.
They want to make a freakshow of everything decent and good. Thats why these laws have existed and continue to in some places. You don’t have the right to piss all over the societal norms that you disagree with. Most people are tolerant and will look the other way under those circumstances if you’re at least discreet about your perversion. But no, once they’re forced to accept that what they do is in fact harmful to themselves and the world that they live in, they cant accept responsibility, and adjust their behavior. Just attack society instead.
I used to be a lolbert down for the whole "married gays using m79s to defend their pot farm" thing.
World War T made me realize you can't just "live and let live" if the other side is constantly pushing. The only way to keep from losing ground is to constantly push back.
And since I'm turbohitler anyway for not believing a man can turn into a woman by wishing I've been freed to entertain all of those naughty outside-overton thoughts about race and sex and everything else.
I bought that sticker too, how could you not? I was all for pot too until it became legal and they ruined it. But adopt the philosophy? Sounds great and all, except fags are fags and we need MORE governance not less. The moral variety. There is a deep deep decay that has to be fixed.
One conclusion I recently came to is that it would be beneficial for a society to be opposed to homosexual sex and anal sex in general. A traditional taboo against homosexuality likely served beneficial purposes.
AIDS almost never spreads to men through vaginal sex. This means that the entirety of the sexual spread outside of the homosexual male population was caused by bisexual men who fucked around in the gay pool and brought it back to the hetero pop. Yes, there was spread through needles as well, but this would be irrelevant for societies that didn't have drugs (traditional taboos).
Combine this with the extreme amount of different sexual partners many homosexual men will have, and you have an explosion of STDs which spread to the full population thanks to bisexual men. Some STDs may be deadly or cause infertility. Thus, there's an evolutionary incentive for a society to be opposed to male homosexuality, at least beyond a monogamous relationship (rare for the gays).
A possible corollary is that societies shouldn't have nearly as strong a taboo against female homosexuality as male homosexuality, as this disease spreading aspect doesn't exist there, although women not breeding is obviously bad for a society so such a taboo might still exist.
You reverse engineered traditional attitudes towards homosexuality, which indeed frowned on male homosexuality but less so on female homosexuality.
Because tradcucks are scared of criticizing women.
From the guy who said that marriage came into existence with Christianity.
Is that why he hated Christians so much lol
Or maybe, and this might be too simple for you to understand. Men see two women fuck and find it hot, so they didn't hate it as much.
Though it is amusing to think "all of human history in every corner of the world are just tradcucks."
This may be the reason today, but I am pretty sure it was not the reason in, say, the Middle Ages.
Actual lesbians don't look like they do on porn sites.
The correct balance is what we had before the "sexual revolution".
Criminalize sodomy, homosexuality treated as the mental illness it is, severe social stigma against fornication, frowning on any public discourse around sex. Obscenity charged against any publication that breaks these norms.
Chastity is praised publicly and expressions of lust are shamed.
Complete prohibition of any use of public funding or other resources for 'research' into sexual 'psychology' or 'attitudes' (really all 'social science' needs to be treated like the subversive quackery it is).
Thats the thing. People interpret the reasons why some laws exist about as well as they interpret scripture, or the greeks. Of course no one expects sodomy laws to eliminate homosexuality or depravity. They exist to establish a precedent set by the cultural standards of the community.
Every faggot on earth knows that what they do is against nature. Thats why they invest so much in ‘pride’ and ‘discrimination’ efforts. They couldn’t function for long with the cognitive dissonance without offing or exiling themselves if they can’t point to some external justification for their abject depravity.
Two men shoving their cocks in each others assholes and mouths. Look at it for what it is. These are boys that upon learning the nature of men and the world knew that they couldn’t compete — but rather than foregoing a mate that they couldn’t win or fulfill and adjusting to reality, instead chose utter depravity as the winning solution to their neuroticisms.
I’ve lost all sympathy at this point. Every homosexual I’ve ever known, and there’s been an over representation in my life compared to many, has never been anything close to normal on so many levels.
Sure, they may caricaturize aspects of ‘Trad’ life but its always with a smirk of disdain — example: Brunch. Watch how fags have brunch.
They want to make a freakshow of everything decent and good. Thats why these laws have existed and continue to in some places. You don’t have the right to piss all over the societal norms that you disagree with. Most people are tolerant and will look the other way under those circumstances if you’re at least discreet about your perversion. But no, once they’re forced to accept that what they do is in fact harmful to themselves and the world that they live in, they cant accept responsibility, and adjust their behavior. Just attack society instead.
I used to be a lolbert down for the whole "married gays using m79s to defend their pot farm" thing.
World War T made me realize you can't just "live and let live" if the other side is constantly pushing. The only way to keep from losing ground is to constantly push back.
And since I'm turbohitler anyway for not believing a man can turn into a woman by wishing I've been freed to entertain all of those naughty outside-overton thoughts about race and sex and everything else.
I bought that sticker too, how could you not? I was all for pot too until it became legal and they ruined it. But adopt the philosophy? Sounds great and all, except fags are fags and we need MORE governance not less. The moral variety. There is a deep deep decay that has to be fixed.
Tell me. Now you've piqued our curiosity.