I think an instinctual reaction of "intriguing to hot" compared to "disgust to revulsion" has always been the case.
Plural women has always been the desire for the male of a species, in order to better spread his seed. Two women together presents the possibility of joining, which even in caveman days was a benefit.
I've seen full girl only lesbians. Most weren't attractive but also far less disgusting than most "oh I totally love girls! (except I date almost all guys) bisexual girls.
Regardless, point is that the idea of girl on girl is hot. While the idea of two guys even kissing makes most dudes get nauseous. Reality doesn't need to equal up for that to work.
Or maybe, and this might be too simple for you to understand. Men see two women fuck and find it hot, so they didn't hate it as much.
Though it is amusing to think "all of human history in every corner of the world are just tradcucks."
This may be the reason today, but I am pretty sure it was not the reason in, say, the Middle Ages.
I think an instinctual reaction of "intriguing to hot" compared to "disgust to revulsion" has always been the case.
Plural women has always been the desire for the male of a species, in order to better spread his seed. Two women together presents the possibility of joining, which even in caveman days was a benefit.
Doesn't matter. The slightest tingle of the boner is enough to soften one on it, compared to the immediate revulsion when one sees dudes together.
if you were to watch actual lesbians attempt to do it you would get an innie
think hairy armpits and legs and lots of fupa adjustment
I've seen full girl only lesbians. Most weren't attractive but also far less disgusting than most "oh I totally love girls! (except I date almost all guys) bisexual girls.
Regardless, point is that the idea of girl on girl is hot. While the idea of two guys even kissing makes most dudes get nauseous. Reality doesn't need to equal up for that to work.