Rare Photo Displaying Mental Illness in 2022
(media.communities.win)
Comments (15)
sorted by:
I'm not American and what these... people... understand by "pro choice" is absolutely nuts to me, never mind the fact that abortion is not a right. I remember that at least in the past, the debate was somewhat more polite, I guess, and with less foaming at the mouth, but these latest generations of lunatics are making any kind of discussion almost impossible, especially since they use that deceiving opening "we just want to start a conversation" while wanting nothing of the sort.
I would consider myself 'pro choice' but hearing/seeing these nut-jobs advocate for late-term or even mid-term abortions, outside of there being a risk of the mother dying, is absolutely nuts to me. As I see it, they should have at most 8 weeks to decide if they don't want the baby. If 8 weeks go by, fetal development begins and they're having the baby, no more choice. They shouldn't even reach that stage anyway, there's all kinds of options to avoid getting pregnant.
Even that should be off limits, since in the second trimester fetal development is well underway, and that would/should count as a murder, it surely does when a pregnant woman is killed.
a well regulated militia does not mean a bunch of faggot laws and a specifically defined militia.
well regulated in 1776 meant "in working order". the militia is every warm body able to hold a gun and show up when there's trouble.
I don't remember it being more polite in the past. Both sides were yelling past one another, calling the opposition insane or evil, and not winning any converts over to the truth. The difference was in the past you didn't have so many ignorant NPCs with no stake in the matter taking a side (most people didn't care about politics or "social justice") and institutions like academia and media may have been biased but weren't so transparently on one side. Unless you were talking to a known lefty like Donahue, it was correctly framed as a political debate with opposing viewpoints. Now it's "far-right White Christian misogynists vs. human rights". The extremists were always like that but the extremes have expanded. Even back then liberals were probably taking the typical "you must tolerate me until I'm in power, then I won't tolerate you" approach.
Quit enabling irresponsibility
Fatass lumps in wheelchairs, probably because they're too fat to walk five feet, serve as bookends. And a soyboy cuckold is front and center, natch, with other sexless blobs who could only become impregnated via turkey baster, and even that would be no guarantee.
I suppose they trot out people who should have been aborted to illustrate abortion's usefulness in purifying the gene pool. Score a point for eugenics?
People in general are waking up to the depravity of the "pro choice" mob. Watch their ranks thin, get reduced to the human garbage you see here.
Zero sympathy, zero compromise. That's done.
That is very optimistic. The media controls perceptions. Maybe some right-wingers who are pro-choice will change their minds due to this sort of insanity, but everyone else will be shielded from it. And in fact, they will probably panic about underage rape victims being forced to carry the fetus to term, because that is what the media will focus on.
I suppose I was rather optimistic this AM. I strobe between gloom and not-so-gloomy in my outlook.
The more I've thought about it, the worse this argument actually is.
Roe v. Wade was specific that the right to an abortion that was inferred from a right to privacy between the doctor and patient. They didn't even say that bodily autonomy was relevant.
Fundamentally, when it comes down to it, they're fighting for the right to choose to kill something. Bodily autonomy isn't part of the equation. Safety isn't part of the equation. Repression isn't part of the equation. Their argument is that women have the right to kill. That the right to kill is a fundamental right that women have. They don't mean human right as in a human universal. They mean that only women have the right to kill.
You’re getting it, they want complete autonomy despite the cost to others. That has been the feminist movement, all take, zero discussion.
To be honest, when I was watching this video by ShortFatOtaku , who did a really great job, I realized that since Leftism is a Philosophy of War... these people weren't just celebrating or moralizing abortions... they are operating under the idea that babies are oppressing them.
That's when it hit me.
Babies are the enemy.
And then I was like, yeah... pro-choice actually sounds evil.
I think my take of: "Abortion is the most ethical form of infanticide we have" actually sounds nicer than "pro-choice means the choice to kill babies is a moral imperative because babies oppress women. Eat the
richbabies."Tell ya what. You can have all the abortions you want if you repeal every single gun restriction law on the books. All of them. Self-defense is a human right.
No, you're thinking of self-defense.
I wish.