Biden lets slip who his masters are! #MoreFeminineWay
(mobile.twitter.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Speaking of the “more feminine way”, I’m surprised you haven’t posted this one yet: https://mobile.twitter.com/CBSNews/status/1542164788062601217
Edit: just realized that you did post it yesterday, I missed that
You would think that someone who is prime minister in a major country could afford a decent fucking haircut.
I did post it.
Makes you wonder if the point of the war in Ukraine is to make Putin resign and install a woman somehow.
Explain.
Biden: <Generic shitlib complaining that's been said a gorillion times>
Imp1: The secret agenda is revealed!
Remember when the man everyone thinks will be the next President turned out to be a shill for the NOW?
Remember when Boris Johnson expressed desire for Putin to be replaced by a woman?
Remember when a woman led country blockaded Russia to try and escalate the war?
The agenda is only secret if you aren't paying attention.
I'm sure you won't listen to me, but if I were you, I'd knock that off because it only makes you sound crazy. Not even Democrats (who you claimed were turning on the women, btw) listen to that catlady organization known as the NOW, let alone DeSantis.
But it really happened. You can argue all you want, he voted against party lines to back what they wanted.
I should check which rats who voted against drafting women are up for primarying.
He can align with anyone for reasons other than "he is their puppet". For example, because a bill is unconstitutional.
How you are unable to understand this is a mystery to me. Your one mode of explanation is that someone is being "puppeteered", which betrays 0 understanding of politics, social relations, humanity, and an excess of autism.
They're shaking in their boots.
But it isn't unconstitutional, the passage he used to determine it was made Roe v Wade look like good precedent.
If any bill that affects a pre-existing contract can't be passed, there would be no way to pass any bills. You couldn't even ban abortion, because some people have an employment contract to perform them.
This is the man who got famous by breaking Disney, specifically by breaking the contract between them and the state of Florida.
So...he knows it's constitutional. He's lying through his teeth and hoping you'll fall for it.
Incorrect. Giving Disney a special status in law is in no way a 'contract' in perpetuity. It is a privilege that may be revoked at any time.
Your test for whether something is constitution is if it 'hurts women' in your mind.
I'm not even going to argue against your crazy. Just like with your "Kathy Barnette is a feminist", it just serves to show that you are completely out of your mind.
The President('s husband) is speaking near verbatim the same kind of garbage that Margaret Atwood and her ilk would say?
There is no war on women's rights. It's pure projection. Women are at war with everyone else's rights.
"Women's rights" is a stock phrase for them. All Democrats. And they also assert that abortion is "women's rights" - though they cannot define what a woman is.
There you go again.
Nah, this is just because women are illogical and vote for anything that tugs their heart strings.
"Folks, lets get one thing straight: the Ultra-MAGA agenda has always been about leaving it up to states to decide policy relating to personal issues." just doesnt galvanize the democrat base.
What? This is literally in your Constitution.
By that logic, him banning abortion and affecting the employment contracts of abortionists is also unconstitutional.
Or his famous move against Disney, which is the only reason anyone knows he exists.
You're the first guy who says that an actual provision in the Constitution is 'more egregious than Roe vs. Wade'. I guess you do think that Roe vs. Wade as based in the Constitution.
God damnit, you're salty.
What I'm saying is that he is taking things way out of logical context. Forcing fairness in divorce is not a significant change to marriage contracts.
A line like that is to prevent the government passing laws that completely change business contracts, which is not what this is.
Just for the sake of the argument, let us assume that DeSantis is mistaken about this.
Is the most likely explanation "he made a mistake" (rather, his staff did), or he took constitutionalism too far, or... HE IS BEING PUPPETEERED BY NOW!!!!!!!!
What people regard as 'fair' differs based on the person. For example, I'm pretty sure that you think 'fairness' would be to throw the woman in the case to the sharks.
Maybe some GOP Nazi gender members in the FL legislature voted for it. And you just blindly trust THEM, even though they want you dead and tortured?
It unilaterally changes the terms for parties who agreed under different terms. So it must not be retroactive.
I mean, what has giving benefit of the doubt got us? There's no point in even holding a three strike system, it should just be automatic dismissal. Feminism is the enemy and if you're not willing to stand against them, fuck off because there are enough Mitt Romney wannabes.
I mean, most people would consider not allowing the woman to use child custody as a weapon to maximize her payout as fair. At least most men would.
So, we should keep all contracts that are clearly biased against one party? It could have been solved by giving them the right to annulment if these new terms didn't suit them. Not divorce, no, just fuck off and take nothing, because if you can't even accept not using kids as a bargaining chip, you don't deserve a cent.
You forgot that I am not interested in your hatred for women.
You just have such obsessions that you are fine with violating the Constitution. That's fine.
https://nitter.it/POTUS/status/1542142703491850241
Working theory : Jill Biden is the person acting as President of the United States.
I am pretty sure Kim Potter is acting as President of the United States.
That be President of the United States n sheeit fo u yt.
There is not a single person in the White House that is in charge of anything.
And not Kamala Harris?
Most of his gaffes point to Jill being the true president.
People with dementia are known to blurt things out that are supposed to be private.