Biden lets slip who his masters are! #MoreFeminineWay
(mobile.twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
But it isn't unconstitutional, the passage he used to determine it was made Roe v Wade look like good precedent.
If any bill that affects a pre-existing contract can't be passed, there would be no way to pass any bills. You couldn't even ban abortion, because some people have an employment contract to perform them.
This is the man who got famous by breaking Disney, specifically by breaking the contract between them and the state of Florida.
So...he knows it's constitutional. He's lying through his teeth and hoping you'll fall for it.
Incorrect. Giving Disney a special status in law is in no way a 'contract' in perpetuity. It is a privilege that may be revoked at any time.
Your test for whether something is constitution is if it 'hurts women' in your mind.
I'm not even going to argue against your crazy. Just like with your "Kathy Barnette is a feminist", it just serves to show that you are completely out of your mind.
Even Disney themselves say that unless bonds are paid back in full, the contract between the parties stands. They reserved the right to pursue payment from the residents of the districts Reedy Creek occupies.
If it is unconstitutional to change marriage law, why wasn't it stopped all the times it was changed in favor of women? Why is it only when women have to take a loss on holding custody over men's heads as a negotiation tactic?
He's full of shit. He's going to be the next RINO fuck that "nobody could have ever predicted"
Wow, if Disney says it, that settles it.
Retroactively.
Don't say that! Call him a "NOW puppet", that is more entertaining. And I'll from now on refer to you as "guy who calls DeSantis an NOW puppet", just so people know how seriously they should take you.
Well, by his insane reading of the constitution to benefit women, yes. Disney saying there's a contract means he can't do anything. Of course, it'll magically be constitutional now, because he has to grift his way to being the next Presidential nomination.
No fault divorce, passed in the 70s and 80s to gain feminist support towards banning porn. Ironically, this also was backed by the NOW. I was just talking about it a little while ago, so I remember it. Nice backstabbing from our tradcuck friends. I'm sure there's far more, but that one jumps out as a clear and obvious major change to a contract that should have been ruled unconstitutional.
He's both. He takes his orders from feminists and he'll be a massive thorn in the right's side if they don't get him out ASAP.