No, no. Buying a flashy watch is useless. A $100 sports jersey is useless.
Women are detrimental. Without them, we wouldn't have race baiting, we wouldn't have such a high male suicide rate, we wouldn't have transgenderism, we wouldn't have a welfare state, we wouldn't have high crime rates...
Women are detrimental. Without them, we wouldn't have race baiting...
Because we wouldn't have races.
we wouldn't have such a high male suicide rate...
Because we wouldn't have any males.
we wouldn't have transgenderism...
Because we wouldn't have people.
we wouldn't have a welfare state...
Because we wouldn't have states...aw shit, you know what? Sold.
we wouldn't have high crime rates...
Again, because we wouldn't have people.
Your 'a world without women would be great' is just as nonsensical as their 'reproduction is terrible and people shouldn't do it' stance. Both are A) all but impossible and B) would lead to the end of the human race.
People say I'm the defective one for not wanting kids, but shouldn't we be wondering how people can be so incredibly bad that they literally override your lizard brain because of how awful they are.
People say I'm the defective one for not wanting kids
Yes. Entire point of biological life is to reproduce within the confines of anatomical limits. For some organisms that means asexual reproduction, for others it's sexual reproduction. There are a few that can do both. Our species is the second one. We don't continue to exist without both sexes. No ifs or buts.
Now there's a difference between knowing if you can or can not raise a child at a given time because of long lists of factors but flat out deciding to go against that most simple of biological drives means you are defective. Anyone who takes that route is and, as someone mentioned to you ages ago, right now you are on track to leaving nothing behind. To anyone.
I mean, I guess he'll leave behind a legacy of (not infrequently) batshit insane internet comments, in some data stream somewhere, until the infrastructure of the internet finally (or not so finally) collapses in on itself..? So at least there's that, I guess..?
Speaking of which, even more reason for someone to make a goddamn archive of this place, for posterity! Because unlike the sub itself, we seemingly still haven't developed that capacity here, unfortunately...
No, no. Buying a flashy watch is useless. A $100 sports jersey is useless.
Women are detrimental. Without them, we wouldn't have race baiting, we wouldn't have such a high male suicide rate, we wouldn't have transgenderism, we wouldn't have a welfare state, we wouldn't have high crime rates...
Because we wouldn't have races.
Because we wouldn't have any males.
Because we wouldn't have people.
Because we wouldn't have states...aw shit, you know what? Sold.
Again, because we wouldn't have people.
Your 'a world without women would be great' is just as nonsensical as their 'reproduction is terrible and people shouldn't do it' stance. Both are A) all but impossible and B) would lead to the end of the human race.
Look again at what I replied to.
It already assumes an alternative way of reproducing exists.
...Where does it do that?
Idk where, but Imp is on record saying his ideal society has artificial wombs so relationships with women are completely optional.
A species.
You really do come across like you're advocating for the extinction of humanity at times when you sperg like this.
technically correct because humanity wouldn't exist
Shit, I find myself unironically agreeing with your comments like this, again…
Well wadda you know…
A stopped clock, frankly.
People say I'm the defective one for not wanting kids, but shouldn't we be wondering how people can be so incredibly bad that they literally override your lizard brain because of how awful they are.
Yes. Entire point of biological life is to reproduce within the confines of anatomical limits. For some organisms that means asexual reproduction, for others it's sexual reproduction. There are a few that can do both. Our species is the second one. We don't continue to exist without both sexes. No ifs or buts.
Now there's a difference between knowing if you can or can not raise a child at a given time because of long lists of factors but flat out deciding to go against that most simple of biological drives means you are defective. Anyone who takes that route is and, as someone mentioned to you ages ago, right now you are on track to leaving nothing behind. To anyone.
I mean, I guess he'll leave behind a legacy of (not infrequently) batshit insane internet comments, in some data stream somewhere, until the infrastructure of the internet finally (or not so finally) collapses in on itself..? So at least there's that, I guess..?
Speaking of which, even more reason for someone to make a goddamn archive of this place, for posterity! Because unlike the sub itself, we seemingly still haven't developed that capacity here, unfortunately...
You flatter yourself.