Women are detrimental. Without them, we wouldn't have race baiting...
Because we wouldn't have races.
we wouldn't have such a high male suicide rate...
Because we wouldn't have any males.
we wouldn't have transgenderism...
Because we wouldn't have people.
we wouldn't have a welfare state...
Because we wouldn't have states...aw shit, you know what? Sold.
we wouldn't have high crime rates...
Again, because we wouldn't have people.
Your 'a world without women would be great' is just as nonsensical as their 'reproduction is terrible and people shouldn't do it' stance. Both are A) all but impossible and B) would lead to the end of the human race.
Because we wouldn't have races.
Because we wouldn't have any males.
Because we wouldn't have people.
Because we wouldn't have states...aw shit, you know what? Sold.
Again, because we wouldn't have people.
Your 'a world without women would be great' is just as nonsensical as their 'reproduction is terrible and people shouldn't do it' stance. Both are A) all but impossible and B) would lead to the end of the human race.
Look again at what I replied to.
It already assumes an alternative way of reproducing exists.
...Where does it do that?
Idk where, but Imp is on record saying his ideal society has artificial wombs so relationships with women are completely optional.
Yeah, I know. But he was claiming that what he was responding to said that, and it totally didn't.