The Rifle That Ruined America
(archive.ph)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
The mass shooter's weapon of choice is a handgun. There are like, 200 mass shootings with handguns for every one with an AR15.
They always reply with “focused” statistics that ignore any black shooter and anyone not shot by a rifle. I believe the designation is “long gun”.
The article is frankly so bad it doesn’t even need rebuttal. But the guy unironically blames the Iraq war for the popularity of ar 15s
Didn't read the article but it's commonly thought that the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban (and it's sunset) is what made the AR-15 so popular.
Political fear mongering and the crime wave made anything the media represented as evil despite not being relevant. This is where the scary black guns came from. The weapons ban was the political result, this of course did nothing to prevent the school shootings that came about or the post officer shooters. AR-15s became popular because they are the actual best pdw for the price point and having the same build as a weapon veterans were familiar with for decades also helped. Media representation changed to scary assault rifles because of the 1994 ban. That’s why ar and ar-15 became conflated and a well used term before the Halo and MW generation.
AR-15's are popular because they're cheap, reliable, and genuinely just good guns. Stoner knew how to make a good gun. I mean if you have the option of a 500 dollar AR-15 and a rare and expensive AR-180 or something, which are you going to pick if you're on a budget?
Unironically, video games are a significant contributor, along with other factors such as low cost, to the popularity of the AR-15, and that's a good thing.
Also the fact that it is highly customizable, meaning any rando can tune it to their taste.
Bald faced lie.
Let me point something out that I've seen in the military community for 50 years, but haven't heard anyone talk about in the modern assertions that the 5.56 round is so dangerous that it makes people's lungs explode.
One of the reasons the US Army is switching over to a 6.5 caliber firearm is because since the moment that the US military adopted 5.56, it has been considered a dangerously underpowered round.
Military personnel for decades screamed at the top of their lungs that 5.56 NATO may be very fast, but is outrageously small, and doesn't have enough "stopping power".
The political Left in this country explicitly argued that the weapon was designed to support the Military Industrial Complex's desire to buy nearly unlimited amounts of ammunition since soldiers in Vietnam were being told to basically spray-and-pray with the weapons to their hearts content, while not even being very effective compared to all other previous military weapons in history.
Now, "stopping power" isn't actually a real thing per se, and anyone who's actually familiar with ballistics really doesn't talk about it because the truth is that what stops a bad guy is where you hit him. Marksmanship matters a lot more than caliber.
HOWEVER, the secondary wound cavities from a 5.56 NATO round are way smaller than 7.62 NATO. Even with 20" barrels, these rounds are only effective on a point target out to 550 yards, and most grunts can tell you a story where they shot up a terrorist, who they knew was probably mortally wounded, but managed to run away because they were hopped up on amphetamines & khat so they were both high as fuck, and had dulled nerves. This entire situation is amplified when the soldier is using standard "Green Tip" ammunition which has an armor piercing penetrator which is great for going through armor & concrete, but actually causes the rounds to barely even slow down through flesh alone.
This is not the case with ye olde M-14 with the 7.62 NATO cartridge, because the bitch is so large that it hits people like a sledge hammer moving at the speed of sound.
Ahem:
Now, tell me about how the AR-15 blows out people's lungs, literally disintegrates children leaving only their shoes, and is universally renown for being too dangerous...?
As I recall, one of the primary motivations for switching to 5.56 NATO was that you could carry roughly twice as much for the same weight as you could 7.62 NATO. Full-on 7.62 NATO battle rifles are also very hard on the troops using them, I've heard them described as "fully-automatic flashbangs", with deleterious effects on situational awareness due to the power of the round.
Given that most countries wanted to switch away from 7.62 anyway - it's a round fit for combat out to 600+ metres, which, given the amount of fire support most infantry has on tap, is kinda pointless - 5.56 was a decent enough fit, but, perhaps more importantly, it was an American-produced cartridge. The British .280 (7mm) was also up for consideration but the US effectively vetoed it.
And oh, look. The next calibre the US is after is 6.8mm. Not that I expected them to actually choose a 7mm round, that would be a little too on the nose.
Absolutely correct, this has been understood since the logistical demands on German troops in WW2 required 8mm Mauser rifle rounds meant that they needed constant re-supply for more ammunition. Particularly the MG-42's that made a Machine Gun team over 6 people IIRC.
That's kind of what you get when the idea of a squad automatic weapon is a BAR... which is supposed to be fired from the hip, and comes with a bipod. It's really more of an LMG, but when it was invented intermediate cartridges didn't really exist. It's an improvement on what was already in front of them, but it's not necessarily a great idea.
That being said, the sound of a bunch of 7.62 weapons firing on your position with automatic fire is going to be absolutely pants-shittingly terrifying. The sound of a platoon normally firing with 7.62 is cacophonous. There's no way that the sound doesn't have a significant effect on enemy morale.
"Oi Mate, you got a locinse fo dat 7mm?"
"It's not a 7mm, it's a 6.8 mm"
"Swings an' roundabout's govenah."
"IT'S NOT A 7 MM"
"Aw thinks u might be compensatin' fo sometin' "
"IT'S NOT A 7 MM!!!!!!"
Most Drills are actually idiots, and all the trainers everywhere else make fun of them.
That being said, he was trying to point out something that kind of makes sense:
The 5.56 round has a propensity to tumble aggressively when it hits flesh. The logic of the entire round is that it's moving so fast that it has limited anti-armor capabilities, but when it hits flesh it will tumble and cause damage, making it basically an anti-armor and anti-personnel round. It's propensity to tumble in the body is what causes those massive secondary wound channels.
However, if you give it added anti-armor capabilities (like a tungsten core), and/or make it go faster, it might not slow down: thus preventing it from tumbling, and defeating the entire purpose of having a very high speed round that tumbles on contact.
5.56 ball shatters inside a body when fired at high enough velocities (20 inch barrel), but tends to just go straight in, and straight out, when fired at lower velocities. No shooter as far as I am aware of used 20 inch barrel, and the mil-spec green tip rounds have a steel 'pin' in the design which makes them less likely to fragment/tumble.
you are the reason we are armed.
Why the fuck are we taking lectures from the bitter and twisted ex-wife of Steve Jobs, who has been pictured in a bikini next to convicted child trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell?
Why does every tech billionaire have a bitter ex-wife hellbent on ruining the world with her unearned windfall?
Fear.
They got everything they could ever want served to them on a silver platter, purely because of their sex. No effort, or at least, no REAL effort that merits such results. But because there was no effort, there is no security.
So they need to create that security. 1) Ensure no one can accuse them of wrongdoing, even if they're doing wrongs. 2) Stop other women from succeeding in the same way with the same person, since it would oust their comfy position. 3) Increase their relative value to the commoner by completely crushing the commoners, so that even if they fall, they would need to fall VERY far indeed to actually fall to the level of a commoner.
Doing these three things requires organized movements, and lots of power used very unethically.
Jeff Bezos -> McKenzie Bezos
Bill Gates -> Melinda Gates
Elon Musk -> Amber Heard?
I think it's because these women get into relationships to grift money, and when they get it, it's more than they know what to spend, so they throw it into feminist slush funds.
I'm sure there are more. We haven't even gotten into the you-know-whos yet who prolifically divorce and whose women sit on the board of "charities" everywhere. Follow the money at Planned Parenthood, I bet you find a buttload.
Nah, few rifles of any kind. They have a plentiful of AKs with incompatible ammunition to NATO 5.56. If they ever wanted rifles badly it would be like Polish Beryls or something.
Hit pieces that are absolutely full of shit. Dude forgot that it's 2022 not 2000. ARs have been incredibly popular for a long time, just not with the fudds this retard apparently surrounded himself with.