And if women stopped breeding with the worst aspects of society, then raising those confused children with their indoctrination, the world would also change overnight.
Magically, both sexes are fucking retards making the world worse.
That isn’t helping but probably isn’t the bigger issue. The war on masculinity made men no longer men and women were then free to become full on children. Most people don’t ‘grow up’ anymore and become adults, either.
It isn’t so much that women are breeding with the worst men as we’ve destroyed the number of great men by making them act like women, cutting them down as boys. A lot of guys now may as well have been raised on puberty blockers. That movement is a natural progression of what was already going on. Being a ‘man’ turned into what clothes you wear. Same with being a ‘woman’. The trans movement is just an acknowledgement of that. That is what being a man and woman has come to mean in America in many places, usually the bluer cities. The differences have become cosmetic. Gender dysphoria is just a culmination of that fact in someone’s mind. Being an ugly women is also a lot easier than being an ugly man.
Incentivizing people that can’t care for their kids to have the most is a giant problem though.
The war on masculinity took place after women were already freed to become children. The "sexual revolution" took place at a time when men were either still men (though aged) or just straight dying in a war, yet is the most important event that ruined women going forward.
The war on masculinity is a direct result of women's inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their "freedom" scaring them.
Literal life itself is decided by who women allow to pass on their genes. That's fucking evolution itself, the most basic of biology. Nothing is bigger than that issue.
It all follows from the invention of the birth control pill.
The existence of the pill is what makes arguments in favor of unlimited abortion on demand so aggravating.
It might make sex without pregnancy possible, but too many women don't use it and rely on legal abortion to allow them their promiscuity, which is totally mercenary, thanks to millions of years of evolution and the helplessness of the human infant.
It only happened in 1960, and women as a whole are flailing around trying to find some other way to make their lives meaningful in an effort to rise above their "inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their 'freedom."
This condition is making everybody crazy and resentful. The weak conservative women's movement that seeks to reclaim the virtues of motherhood and domesticity has been fighting an uphill battle, to say the least.
The weak conservative women's movement that seeks to reclaim the virtues of motherhood and domesticity has been fighting an uphill battle, to say the least.
And not a single one of them is actually committed to that idea. They just espouse it because it makes them seem "not like other girls."
Because they won't reject most of the ill gotten gains of feminism that brought us to this place. They want to have that option that they can pretend they are rejecting, while still having it available. That's the real alpha fux/beta bux dichotomy.
That ship sailed a long time ago. In a way transgenderism is just the end result of this, but long before society deified pedophiles in drag it deluded itself into thinking that women's bad mating choices are compatible with the building/maintenance of civilization. All the legal and social mores that the feminists are destroying are incentive structures put in place to get women to make better choices in men, which in turn give men the incentive to be good men and help build society. Feminism is just an excuse to revert back to pre-civilizational intergender relations. That's what people mean when they feminism is destroying civilization. The Red Pillers say that feminism is just women optimizing their sexual strategy. I think there's more to it than that, but they're right that female sexual strategy is a huge part of it.
The Red Pillers say that feminism is just women optimizing their sexual strategy.
Women have no idea of any "sexual strategy" since sex and childbirth were decoupled by the pill. They still mate "across and up social hierarchies" as J. Peterson might put it.
if women stopped breeding with the worst aspects of society
It would help if society didn't reward this behavior. She finds the shit bag fun and exciting, and because society enables her bad behavior she pops out kids with him. She does this because she knows she'll be able to find some beta to pay for her bad choices when the shit bag bails. Instead of glorifying this degeneracy and trying to police men's standards (something society would never do to women) we should go back to making single mothers pariahs and making divorce a huge taboo instead of a free meal ticket. Behavior is largely the product of the incentives in place. If we stopped rewarding degeneracy we'd get less of it.
That certainly does not help. But I also have this crazy notion that since women are allowed to do things like vote and control their lives, they should be held accountable as adults. Which means they can make choices, such as not doing such things.
A black kid who grew up listening to NWA in the ghetto gets plenty of dopamine hits and rewards for acting like a thug and gangbanger, but at the end of the day he still committed a crime and his punished the same as anyone else (in theory, politics being gay muddies this).
But I also have this crazy notion that since women are allowed to do things like vote and control their lives, they should be held accountable as adults.
Oh absolutely. The point I'm making is that our refusal to hold women accountable changes the incentive structure for the worse, so we get more shitty behavior. Using your ghetto example: If we refuse to prosecute and punish thuggery and gangbanging we get more of it, as the blue shitholes that elect woke prosecutors prove on a daily basis.
In another comment in this thread I pointed out that the norms that the feminists are destroying are incentive structures that encourage good behavior from women. Some of those incentive structures boil down to accountability. A good example of this is when I brought up making single mothers pariahs again in my above comment.
If the shitbag is rich and propertied, his shitbaggery matters not one iota to a woman.
I agree with your "rewarding degeneracy" comment. The pill and feminism are directly responsible for social experimentation on a huge scale. and engaging in "degeneracy" is a big part of that..
I know magic. Yet one are treated as perfect goddesses and the other as retarded neanderthals, thereby making both ignore the foil the other one provides to compensate for their flaws.
And if women stopped breeding with the worst aspects of society, then raising those confused children with their indoctrination, the world would also change overnight.
Magically, both sexes are fucking retards making the world worse.
That isn’t helping but probably isn’t the bigger issue. The war on masculinity made men no longer men and women were then free to become full on children. Most people don’t ‘grow up’ anymore and become adults, either.
It isn’t so much that women are breeding with the worst men as we’ve destroyed the number of great men by making them act like women, cutting them down as boys. A lot of guys now may as well have been raised on puberty blockers. That movement is a natural progression of what was already going on. Being a ‘man’ turned into what clothes you wear. Same with being a ‘woman’. The trans movement is just an acknowledgement of that. That is what being a man and woman has come to mean in America in many places, usually the bluer cities. The differences have become cosmetic. Gender dysphoria is just a culmination of that fact in someone’s mind. Being an ugly women is also a lot easier than being an ugly man.
Incentivizing people that can’t care for their kids to have the most is a giant problem though.
The war on masculinity took place after women were already freed to become children. The "sexual revolution" took place at a time when men were either still men (though aged) or just straight dying in a war, yet is the most important event that ruined women going forward.
The war on masculinity is a direct result of women's inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their "freedom" scaring them.
Literal life itself is decided by who women allow to pass on their genes. That's fucking evolution itself, the most basic of biology. Nothing is bigger than that issue.
100%
It all follows from the invention of the birth control pill.
The existence of the pill is what makes arguments in favor of unlimited abortion on demand so aggravating.
It might make sex without pregnancy possible, but too many women don't use it and rely on legal abortion to allow them their promiscuity, which is totally mercenary, thanks to millions of years of evolution and the helplessness of the human infant.
It only happened in 1960, and women as a whole are flailing around trying to find some other way to make their lives meaningful in an effort to rise above their "inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their 'freedom."
This condition is making everybody crazy and resentful. The weak conservative women's movement that seeks to reclaim the virtues of motherhood and domesticity has been fighting an uphill battle, to say the least.
And not a single one of them is actually committed to that idea. They just espouse it because it makes them seem "not like other girls."
Because they won't reject most of the ill gotten gains of feminism that brought us to this place. They want to have that option that they can pretend they are rejecting, while still having it available. That's the real alpha fux/beta bux dichotomy.
If we did not deny biology, maybe this could actually be addressed.
That ship sailed a long time ago. In a way transgenderism is just the end result of this, but long before society deified pedophiles in drag it deluded itself into thinking that women's bad mating choices are compatible with the building/maintenance of civilization. All the legal and social mores that the feminists are destroying are incentive structures put in place to get women to make better choices in men, which in turn give men the incentive to be good men and help build society. Feminism is just an excuse to revert back to pre-civilizational intergender relations. That's what people mean when they feminism is destroying civilization. The Red Pillers say that feminism is just women optimizing their sexual strategy. I think there's more to it than that, but they're right that female sexual strategy is a huge part of it.
Women have no idea of any "sexual strategy" since sex and childbirth were decoupled by the pill. They still mate "across and up social hierarchies" as J. Peterson might put it.
If only
It would help if society didn't reward this behavior. She finds the shit bag fun and exciting, and because society enables her bad behavior she pops out kids with him. She does this because she knows she'll be able to find some beta to pay for her bad choices when the shit bag bails. Instead of glorifying this degeneracy and trying to police men's standards (something society would never do to women) we should go back to making single mothers pariahs and making divorce a huge taboo instead of a free meal ticket. Behavior is largely the product of the incentives in place. If we stopped rewarding degeneracy we'd get less of it.
That certainly does not help. But I also have this crazy notion that since women are allowed to do things like vote and control their lives, they should be held accountable as adults. Which means they can make choices, such as not doing such things.
A black kid who grew up listening to NWA in the ghetto gets plenty of dopamine hits and rewards for acting like a thug and gangbanger, but at the end of the day he still committed a crime and his punished the same as anyone else (in theory, politics being gay muddies this).
Oh absolutely. The point I'm making is that our refusal to hold women accountable changes the incentive structure for the worse, so we get more shitty behavior. Using your ghetto example: If we refuse to prosecute and punish thuggery and gangbanging we get more of it, as the blue shitholes that elect woke prosecutors prove on a daily basis.
In another comment in this thread I pointed out that the norms that the feminists are destroying are incentive structures that encourage good behavior from women. Some of those incentive structures boil down to accountability. A good example of this is when I brought up making single mothers pariahs again in my above comment.
If the shitbag is rich and propertied, his shitbaggery matters not one iota to a woman.
I agree with your "rewarding degeneracy" comment. The pill and feminism are directly responsible for social experimentation on a huge scale. and engaging in "degeneracy" is a big part of that..
It's almost like humans are inherently flawed beings
I know magic. Yet one are treated as perfect goddesses and the other as retarded neanderthals, thereby making both ignore the foil the other one provides to compensate for their flaws.