That isn’t helping but probably isn’t the bigger issue. The war on masculinity made men no longer men and women were then free to become full on children. Most people don’t ‘grow up’ anymore and become adults, either.
It isn’t so much that women are breeding with the worst men as we’ve destroyed the number of great men by making them act like women, cutting them down as boys. A lot of guys now may as well have been raised on puberty blockers. That movement is a natural progression of what was already going on. Being a ‘man’ turned into what clothes you wear. Same with being a ‘woman’. The trans movement is just an acknowledgement of that. That is what being a man and woman has come to mean in America in many places, usually the bluer cities. The differences have become cosmetic. Gender dysphoria is just a culmination of that fact in someone’s mind. Being an ugly women is also a lot easier than being an ugly man.
Incentivizing people that can’t care for their kids to have the most is a giant problem though.
The war on masculinity took place after women were already freed to become children. The "sexual revolution" took place at a time when men were either still men (though aged) or just straight dying in a war, yet is the most important event that ruined women going forward.
The war on masculinity is a direct result of women's inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their "freedom" scaring them.
Literal life itself is decided by who women allow to pass on their genes. That's fucking evolution itself, the most basic of biology. Nothing is bigger than that issue.
It all follows from the invention of the birth control pill.
The existence of the pill is what makes arguments in favor of unlimited abortion on demand so aggravating.
It might make sex without pregnancy possible, but too many women don't use it and rely on legal abortion to allow them their promiscuity, which is totally mercenary, thanks to millions of years of evolution and the helplessness of the human infant.
It only happened in 1960, and women as a whole are flailing around trying to find some other way to make their lives meaningful in an effort to rise above their "inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their 'freedom."
This condition is making everybody crazy and resentful. The weak conservative women's movement that seeks to reclaim the virtues of motherhood and domesticity has been fighting an uphill battle, to say the least.
The weak conservative women's movement that seeks to reclaim the virtues of motherhood and domesticity has been fighting an uphill battle, to say the least.
And not a single one of them is actually committed to that idea. They just espouse it because it makes them seem "not like other girls."
Because they won't reject most of the ill gotten gains of feminism that brought us to this place. They want to have that option that they can pretend they are rejecting, while still having it available. That's the real alpha fux/beta bux dichotomy.
That isn’t helping but probably isn’t the bigger issue. The war on masculinity made men no longer men and women were then free to become full on children. Most people don’t ‘grow up’ anymore and become adults, either.
It isn’t so much that women are breeding with the worst men as we’ve destroyed the number of great men by making them act like women, cutting them down as boys. A lot of guys now may as well have been raised on puberty blockers. That movement is a natural progression of what was already going on. Being a ‘man’ turned into what clothes you wear. Same with being a ‘woman’. The trans movement is just an acknowledgement of that. That is what being a man and woman has come to mean in America in many places, usually the bluer cities. The differences have become cosmetic. Gender dysphoria is just a culmination of that fact in someone’s mind. Being an ugly women is also a lot easier than being an ugly man.
Incentivizing people that can’t care for their kids to have the most is a giant problem though.
The war on masculinity took place after women were already freed to become children. The "sexual revolution" took place at a time when men were either still men (though aged) or just straight dying in a war, yet is the most important event that ruined women going forward.
The war on masculinity is a direct result of women's inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their "freedom" scaring them.
Literal life itself is decided by who women allow to pass on their genes. That's fucking evolution itself, the most basic of biology. Nothing is bigger than that issue.
100%
It all follows from the invention of the birth control pill.
The existence of the pill is what makes arguments in favor of unlimited abortion on demand so aggravating.
It might make sex without pregnancy possible, but too many women don't use it and rely on legal abortion to allow them their promiscuity, which is totally mercenary, thanks to millions of years of evolution and the helplessness of the human infant.
It only happened in 1960, and women as a whole are flailing around trying to find some other way to make their lives meaningful in an effort to rise above their "inability to understand what they want, their resentment of not having it, and numerous other neurosis brought on by their 'freedom."
This condition is making everybody crazy and resentful. The weak conservative women's movement that seeks to reclaim the virtues of motherhood and domesticity has been fighting an uphill battle, to say the least.
And not a single one of them is actually committed to that idea. They just espouse it because it makes them seem "not like other girls."
Because they won't reject most of the ill gotten gains of feminism that brought us to this place. They want to have that option that they can pretend they are rejecting, while still having it available. That's the real alpha fux/beta bux dichotomy.
Damn, that's a good one.
I haven't really met any conservative women, now that you mention it. Surely there must be some out there--conservative or Libertarian women.
Is Ann Coulter a media freak that illustrates your generality?