17
Comments (11)
sorted by:
11
FutaCumDiet 11 points ago +11 / -0

"If everyone refuses..."

Oh, so, we're fucked. I've spend 2 years watching the normie masses wear a fucking face diaper because they were told to do so or because they wanted to fit in. Even just sitting alone in their fucking car. Even with mask mandates being "lifted", you still have these loser faggots walking around wearing them, being complicit in their own subjugation.

"The beatings will continue until morale improves."

7
almond_activator 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's an information-dense camera square.

6
The_Gay_Deceiver 6 points ago +6 / -0

Don't think I've ever used a QR code before. Never understood the utility.

8
xleb2 [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Here in Seattle restaurants have done away with menus, nobody has them anymore. You have to scan a QR everywhere to read the menu on your phone. Sometimes restaurants even have a phone you can use if you don't have your own. I absolutely hate them.

3
Knife-TotingRat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oooof.

A restaurant here just got a busboy bot.

3
Grumman 3 points ago +3 / -0

They do have a valid use case. Say you want to put a link to a specific web article on a poster. Rather than have a long URL that the viewer has to type in on their smartphone's on-screen keyboard (and risk typos), and rather than using a third party link shortener service, you can encode the URL as a barcode that is far easier for their smartphone to interpret than ordinary text. However, as this video points out, a QR code is not easily interpreted by a human, and may not actually say what you think it does.

1
The_Gay_Deceiver 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see anything anyone would make a QR code for being hard to search up normally.

3
AnotherSchwarzesMark 3 points ago +3 / -0

Laziness is why they exist. People don't want to type in anything anymore, even voice input is too much since you need to click around. People became so lazy.

1
Grumman 1 point ago +1 / -0

A Google search is also making yourself reliant on a third party service. I wouldn't trust Google to leave your article as the first result if it's anything that conflicts with their politics.

3
cccpneveragain 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not really the information being there or not I'd call a concern. I mean that's all stuff the government already knows about a person. Albeit if it's actually stored in the code itself that opens up for others to take advantage of it.

The concern I would be more on about is the normalization of having to present a credential and be approved to go about daily life. As soon as everyone is used to that concept, it's all too easy to take your access away for any reason whatsoever.

2
BidenLikesMiners 2 points ago +2 / -0

"NEW TECHNOLOGY RUINS YOUR PRIVACY! MORE AT 11 ON THE NEWS!!"