We're not groomers, you are
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
I found this on Facebook. The poster had deleted any comment asking if he knew what was in the books for these children.
This is a wonderful tactic though. The declaration of helping is hard to fight. If you think you're helping, you will go really far, or feel satisfied.
I dare to ask what half baked study they linked to support their claims showing sexual education starting at 5 years old prevents abuse?
By "sex education" they mean "don't let people touch your no-no areas." They equate that with "hey kids, want some puberty blockers?" It's Motte and Bailey, as usual.
They just pretend all bad things didn't occur, or are already over, so it doesn't matter anymore.
is called motte and bailey argument.
in public they claim they want to teach kids sexual education for their protection
in private they bring forward their gender theory that fits their agenda
the same way they claim CRT is teaching kids about slavery.
do not stop them now, and in 12-15 years you will be fighting the "kids can consent because the school teaches them about sex" crowd
I doubt it will be that long.
And there is truth to what they say; teaching children about their body parts, puberty, and why kids can't have sex with adults is important.
But they're also admitting, in a roundabout way, that these groomers are not simply "teaching sex ed".