If trannies take power from women, suddenly the enemy is a lot easier to take down.
Okay.
Say the trannies win. There's no definition of woman other than 'if they say they're a woman, they're a woman.' Then what? Other than schadenfreude, what good has come?
You've annihilated feminism and replaced it with a cult that incentivises men to be or pretend to be faggots if they want to get ahead in life. You've got a generation of 20 year old men dressing up as Astolfo, waxing their legs and spreading their boipussy on onlyfans instead working in the mines to bring up the iron that makes the steel that makes the guns that conquer the chinks. Now what?
You think those faggots will be any better to deal with than radfems? They won't.
Your birth rate will still be in the toilet, you'll still be importing walking pieces of shit the from third world, and you'll still be staring down the barrel of societal collapse and a future of Chinese communist domination.
Great, they're also empathy void collectivist hivemind bugpeople who, like the Bantu, systematically annihilate everyone they conquer, but unlike the Bantu, get it done in a few hundred years rather than over a thousand.
If you've successfully defined woman out of existence, all their privileges go.
No they won't, because no matter what your definition is, people will still know the reality of the situation, no matter what the official propaganda says.
Look no further than Biden's supreme court pick. They had no trouble selecting a woman, even as they insisted they couldn't define what a woman is.
Why would I want to go to war with China?
Because you won't have an option if you want the west to remain in control.
Most likely if you make feminism die, you'd be at war with the EU.
OK. I'm glad you finally admitted this. You've aligned yourself with groomers and are mad that women are attacking your groomer allies.
I've said this before. It's a complicated moral dilemma - do you support women winning in the hope it ends or do you support the trannies in the hope of creating an unpalatable enemy to destroy?
Opposing child groomers is the easiest decision possible to make.
If trannies take power from women, suddenly the enemy is a lot easier to take down.
This makes no sense. The tranny push is and always has come from wealthy elites, of the same crowd that have pushed feminism and the rest of shitlib agenda. There is no "changing of power" going on.
I'm not sure I follow. I have gone against transgenderism lots of times. I just feel like in a war between women and (blank), we should support (blank), whatever that may be.
In this case the blank is "pedo groomers" so...at least I know where you stand.
Women aren't groomers at all. They have young men buying literal shit from them in my birth country, so don't act like they aren't pulling the same trick for their own ends.
Weird fetishes have been around longer than the feminist movement. The sexual revolution, which feminists supported, helped unleash them. The resulting normalization of pornography, which you support, has also played a big part. I have yet to see any evidence that these particular fetishes are being cultivated via the school system, and even if they were, it's not as bad as tranny grooming. These men could always stop buying turds in a jar at any moment. You can't fix the mutilated bodies of tranny grooming victims.
No it hasn't. The tranny push comes from the same root as the Indians who bought skin whitening products under British rule. A clear elite class that they want to emulate to hopefully share in the privileges of.
Wrong. It comes from wealthy elites and is pushed from the top down. It's not grassroots.
Then you changed your mind about this, because you were always attacking me for saying that GC are an ally against the presently greater threat that is wokeism.
Why are you salty about women wanting to shutdown groomers?
Pfft. As if you care about children, you have a strong tendency to hamster your way into defending trannies, the worst of the groomers.
Okay.
Say the trannies win. There's no definition of woman other than 'if they say they're a woman, they're a woman.' Then what? Other than schadenfreude, what good has come?
You've annihilated feminism and replaced it with a cult that incentivises men to be or pretend to be faggots if they want to get ahead in life. You've got a generation of 20 year old men dressing up as Astolfo, waxing their legs and spreading their boipussy on onlyfans instead working in the mines to bring up the iron that makes the steel that makes the guns that conquer the chinks. Now what?
You think those faggots will be any better to deal with than radfems? They won't.
Your birth rate will still be in the toilet, you'll still be importing walking pieces of shit the from third world, and you'll still be staring down the barrel of societal collapse and a future of Chinese communist domination.
st least china isnt gay
Great, they're also empathy void collectivist hivemind bugpeople who, like the Bantu, systematically annihilate everyone they conquer, but unlike the Bantu, get it done in a few hundred years rather than over a thousand.
No they won't, because no matter what your definition is, people will still know the reality of the situation, no matter what the official propaganda says.
Look no further than Biden's supreme court pick. They had no trouble selecting a woman, even as they insisted they couldn't define what a woman is.
Because you won't have an option if you want the west to remain in control.
The EU is collection of American puppet states.
OK. I'm glad you finally admitted this. You've aligned yourself with groomers and are mad that women are attacking your groomer allies.
Opposing child groomers is the easiest decision possible to make.
This makes no sense. The tranny push is and always has come from wealthy elites, of the same crowd that have pushed feminism and the rest of shitlib agenda. There is no "changing of power" going on.
In this case the blank is "pedo groomers" so...at least I know where you stand.
Weird fetishes have been around longer than the feminist movement. The sexual revolution, which feminists supported, helped unleash them. The resulting normalization of pornography, which you support, has also played a big part. I have yet to see any evidence that these particular fetishes are being cultivated via the school system, and even if they were, it's not as bad as tranny grooming. These men could always stop buying turds in a jar at any moment. You can't fix the mutilated bodies of tranny grooming victims.
Wrong. It comes from wealthy elites and is pushed from the top down. It's not grassroots.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-document-that-reveals-the-remarkable-tactics-of-trans-lobbyists
Then you changed your mind about this, because you were always attacking me for saying that GC are an ally against the presently greater threat that is wokeism.
There are a great number of intermediate steps in between. Try to accomplish that, rather than your pipe-dream fantasy.
Apparently step 1 is defending tranny groomers.
Because your definition of 'far-right' now encapsulates 'mother who cares about her children'.
"Air is far right"
If only we can convince them to stop consuming it...
It's a gynocentric society, 800 variations that are really ways to call others a Bitch.
The real far right says women shouldnt be allowed to vote.