It's correct what you say. Remember that in the right wing category they're also including islamic criminal activity, so the actual number for white activists would be much lower than reported in the link above.
It's also almost an impossibility to commit any left wing crimes. Look at property damage for example: lefties spraying hammer and sicle somewhere won't be counted outright as left wing while a swastika no matter if the left or write or anyone did will always be counted as right wing.
Bodily harm I would also mostly attribute to islamists for the right side, if any nazi ACTUALLY attacked someone you would hear about it 24/7 for like a month. Meanwhile we have had lefties attack politicians. I remember one far right politician being attacked at his residence where they pretended to be police and smashed his kneecaps with a hammer, basically tortured him. You heard NOTHING on the news. One politician was even murdered and we only heard a tiny bit about it.
the far left is retarded but you gotta ask how retarded the right has to be to respond to this with "but violence is wrong i have to stay passive and be slowly genocided away"
Even though Reddit seems to be leaning against the attackers, they are still saying shit like "this store specifically advertises to the far right, they are just barely keeping it legal." without considering that the German concept of "Far-Right" is Liberalism, the woman who was beaten was a black woman apparently selling to Neonazis, and that the concept of a 'barely legal' t-shirt shouldn't even exist.
Literally: 'mob violence against a retail worker is kinda wrong, but it is political violence directed against my enemies, so I'd rather not advertise it.'
The Left's funding comes from institutions, so they don't do any damage to a power structure, and make more of a symbolic attack on a small retail structure. This will further alarm people's senses, but nothing actually changes structurally. It keeps the plebians on their toes.
This is why genuine terrorism from the Left gets overlooked. When they blow up a room in a capital building with a bomb, or use a truck-bomb to destroy a Chemistry building at a college (like they have during the Days of Rage), it doesn't actually threaten the power structure.
No, the real threat to the power structure is when you buy Gamestop stocks when your subordinate hedge funds were supposed to be dictating the market. Or when you leak classified information that exposes government spying operations. Or when you release thousands of scientific documents that were secured behind an academic paywall. Or when you set up a site out-side of the big-tech sphere for people to talk or pay money to things they like.
It's that phrase: "you know you're over the target when the flak is heaviest". You know you've threatened a real power structure when the first thing the government does in response is to break or re-write the law within 24 hours.
If the government bureaucracy dotted it's i's and crossed it's t's to stay within the law, and assigned it to someone who hopes they can advance their career with it, you didn't threaten anything.
Notice it was a bunch of white communists who attacked a black woman in a store because they allegedly sold far-right merchandise. None of which can be seen in this video.
The racial rhetoric is never about race, it's about balkanizing people into blocs in order to advocate Socialism.
Also the one beating her with a baton seems to be a woman. I've read discussion that German reports are saying the attack was carried out by '3 men' - not to get too TheImp about things, but if true that seems an obvious attempt to obfuscate that the 4th and most violent was a woman. There is no niche too small upon which they won't put up shields or insert levers to wage identity-based warfare.
The journalists don't care and would prefer to push their state approved narratives rather than go with facts. Those state approved narratives also happen to assist in balkanization.
The far left does millions of times more violence than the right
Stats here: https://www.statista.com/statistics/963069/right-wing-left-wing-crimes-by-type-germany/
It's correct what you say. Remember that in the right wing category they're also including islamic criminal activity, so the actual number for white activists would be much lower than reported in the link above.
It's also almost an impossibility to commit any left wing crimes. Look at property damage for example: lefties spraying hammer and sicle somewhere won't be counted outright as left wing while a swastika no matter if the left or write or anyone did will always be counted as right wing.
Bodily harm I would also mostly attribute to islamists for the right side, if any nazi ACTUALLY attacked someone you would hear about it 24/7 for like a month. Meanwhile we have had lefties attack politicians. I remember one far right politician being attacked at his residence where they pretended to be police and smashed his kneecaps with a hammer, basically tortured him. You heard NOTHING on the news. One politician was even murdered and we only heard a tiny bit about it.
the far left is retarded but you gotta ask how retarded the right has to be to respond to this with "but violence is wrong i have to stay passive and be slowly genocided away"
Even though Reddit seems to be leaning against the attackers, they are still saying shit like "this store specifically advertises to the far right, they are just barely keeping it legal." without considering that the German concept of "Far-Right" is Liberalism, the woman who was beaten was a black woman apparently selling to Neonazis, and that the concept of a 'barely legal' t-shirt shouldn't even exist.
Literally: 'mob violence against a retail worker is kinda wrong, but it is political violence directed against my enemies, so I'd rather not advertise it.'
The employee was black? Couldnt tell from the vid since it was mosaic censored.
Bet thats the resson it was censored, eh? So people wont know its a black person being attacked and that it was some white nazi or something.
They could smash up a bank, stock exchange, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, an Amazon warehouse, a mansion, anything owned by the rich elite.
No.
Instead they beat the shit out of some wageslave woman in some tiny little fashion store.
The Left's funding comes from institutions, so they don't do any damage to a power structure, and make more of a symbolic attack on a small retail structure. This will further alarm people's senses, but nothing actually changes structurally. It keeps the plebians on their toes.
This is why genuine terrorism from the Left gets overlooked. When they blow up a room in a capital building with a bomb, or use a truck-bomb to destroy a Chemistry building at a college (like they have during the Days of Rage), it doesn't actually threaten the power structure.
No, the real threat to the power structure is when you buy Gamestop stocks when your subordinate hedge funds were supposed to be dictating the market. Or when you leak classified information that exposes government spying operations. Or when you release thousands of scientific documents that were secured behind an academic paywall. Or when you set up a site out-side of the big-tech sphere for people to talk or pay money to things they like.
It's that phrase: "you know you're over the target when the flak is heaviest". You know you've threatened a real power structure when the first thing the government does in response is to break or re-write the law within 24 hours.
If the government bureaucracy dotted it's i's and crossed it's t's to stay within the law, and assigned it to someone who hopes they can advance their career with it, you didn't threaten anything.
Notice it was a bunch of white communists who attacked a black woman in a store because they allegedly sold far-right merchandise. None of which can be seen in this video.
The racial rhetoric is never about race, it's about balkanizing people into blocs in order to advocate Socialism.
Correct.
Also the one beating her with a baton seems to be a woman. I've read discussion that German reports are saying the attack was carried out by '3 men' - not to get too TheImp about things, but if true that seems an obvious attempt to obfuscate that the 4th and most violent was a woman. There is no niche too small upon which they won't put up shields or insert levers to wage identity-based warfare.
The journalists don't care and would prefer to push their state approved narratives rather than go with facts. Those state approved narratives also happen to assist in balkanization.
I wonder what parties this clothing store woman voted for.