A lot the stuff they are talking about would be considered "rape culture" if it were male on female, especially this.
During university I had a heterosexual friend who I think wasn't really used to this and on one occasion we were sitting very close together on the sofa and he made a move on me out of nowhere. (there's no salacious ending to that story, I didn't reciprocate and it was as awkward for both of us as you might imagine!)
He later told me that he's never had any gay feelings in his life but if he were to experiment then it would be with me.
It's called Bi-curious, or a 1on the Kinsey Scale. God, so afraid of their own sexuality, they have to bluff their masculinity. It's the exact opposite of the macho straight bullshit.
"I too sometimes feel a little queer inside, but am absolutely straight."
Then you're not straight. You're Bi. You would think they would fully embrace it, but their girlfriend won't fuck a guy who is interested in other guys, let alone fucked them because 'ew, you're a diseased pussy'. These progressive women draw the line with their soy boyfriends at being bi, because they are homophobic. They're also realistic enough to realize a soyboy is more likely a sloppy, bareback bottom. It's all fun and games fetishwise for progressive women, but irl, the only bi guy they would fuck is one who will never act on it. Being Bi is still an instinctual taboo for men in the straight community, mainly because women. They like to watch, they like to fantasize, but if its a guy they want to fuck in real life, it's never going to happen for her. Which is unlike men who like the idea of two women.
their girlfriend won't fuck a guy who is interested in other guys
That's a great point, and it applies to everything those retards advocate in the gender and masculinity area. Just replace "is interested in other guys" with whatever they're advocating for at the moment. They act like society requires that every man be a hyper-masculine reincarnation of Chad Thundercock and brutally oppresses them if they aren't. While no one respects a beta cuck, being one is actually encouraged by society and they get by just fine judging by how many of them there are and how much they're rewarded in a number of fields. The real downside to being the soy soaked version of the ideal man feminists promote is that women aren't attracted to that so beta cucks don't get laid. They rail against "toxic masculinity" constantly but it's women who reward it by putting out for men who display that behavior. So if they want to "redefine masculinity" they're free to do so. They just won't get anyone who wants to get laid on board with it. If they don't like it their real grievance is with women. But I'm sure everyone here can guess what would happen we went into that shithole and said women are the real reason that the thing they call "toxic masculinity" persists.
Exactamundo. That and their faggot groomer friends, who want to guilt their straight guys into sucking their dicks despite feeling no attraction to them whatsoever. Same goes for the degenerate trannies.
Eh, betas can still cash in on post-wall single moms. I’m not saying it’s a quality relationship, or a lasting one, but those dudes do have some sex. For many of them, it’s really their only path to pussy. Shame we don’t have legalized prostitution.
The men in "Menslib" are not men at all. They're the prime candidates to transition to women.
They were probably born as women.
All that grooming of children is coming to fruition.
A lot the stuff they are talking about would be considered "rape culture" if it were male on female, especially this.
People who "experiment" with their sexuality are by definition faggots.
They gay as fuck I have never had the urge to "shower my male friends with affection" that's super gay yo
I get uncomfortable when the bros give me unearned praise.
Reads like a contemporary college bull session, everybody bending over backwards to appear the most woke/faggot-friendly.
God, I'm old. Do these bull sessions still happen in college dorms?
I don't know what that is but it sounds gay.
I thought the image in their sidebar was a dildo before I realised it was meant to be two hands grasping.
Still looks like a dude jerking off another dude though.
It's called Bi-curious, or a 1on the Kinsey Scale. God, so afraid of their own sexuality, they have to bluff their masculinity. It's the exact opposite of the macho straight bullshit.
"I too sometimes feel a little queer inside, but am absolutely straight."
Then you're not straight. You're Bi. You would think they would fully embrace it, but their girlfriend won't fuck a guy who is interested in other guys, let alone fucked them because 'ew, you're a diseased pussy'. These progressive women draw the line with their soy boyfriends at being bi, because they are homophobic. They're also realistic enough to realize a soyboy is more likely a sloppy, bareback bottom. It's all fun and games fetishwise for progressive women, but irl, the only bi guy they would fuck is one who will never act on it. Being Bi is still an instinctual taboo for men in the straight community, mainly because women. They like to watch, they like to fantasize, but if its a guy they want to fuck in real life, it's never going to happen for her. Which is unlike men who like the idea of two women.
That's a great point, and it applies to everything those retards advocate in the gender and masculinity area. Just replace "is interested in other guys" with whatever they're advocating for at the moment. They act like society requires that every man be a hyper-masculine reincarnation of Chad Thundercock and brutally oppresses them if they aren't. While no one respects a beta cuck, being one is actually encouraged by society and they get by just fine judging by how many of them there are and how much they're rewarded in a number of fields. The real downside to being the soy soaked version of the ideal man feminists promote is that women aren't attracted to that so beta cucks don't get laid. They rail against "toxic masculinity" constantly but it's women who reward it by putting out for men who display that behavior. So if they want to "redefine masculinity" they're free to do so. They just won't get anyone who wants to get laid on board with it. If they don't like it their real grievance is with women. But I'm sure everyone here can guess what would happen we went into that shithole and said women are the real reason that the thing they call "toxic masculinity" persists.
Exactamundo. That and their faggot groomer friends, who want to guilt their straight guys into sucking their dicks despite feeling no attraction to them whatsoever. Same goes for the degenerate trannies.
Eh, betas can still cash in on post-wall single moms. I’m not saying it’s a quality relationship, or a lasting one, but those dudes do have some sex. For many of them, it’s really their only path to pussy. Shame we don’t have legalized prostitution.