The repeated references to Tyson, with his fraught history of violence against women, draw on very old and dangerous stereotypes of Black boys and men as inherently violent
Tyson wishes his swings had this much reach, holy shit.
nope. not at all born out by the fact that US census data shows black males aged 13-45 are only 3% of the US population, but FBI crime stats show they commit over 50% of all crime in the country. nope nope nope.
If I recall correctly, those were specifically violent crimes.
Also, the govt did not count unsolved murder cases, which account for 40% of all murder cases and are almost entirely gang related aka blacks killing other blacks. So the true number is closer to 3/70.
Imagine living in a society where 3% of the population commits 70% of the murders, but no one can talk about it publicly and the perpetrator demographic is actually a protected class.
The stereotype isn't even relevant to the discussion.
Tyson isn't being refered to in the trans athletes conversation because he's black or violent, he's being referred to in the trans athletes conversation because there there is simply no woman on earth, past or present, who could ever hold a fucking candle to him.
That's what makes this avenue of argumentation from WaPo so fucking moronic.
The govt has literally stopped reporting those crime stats btw. As of this quarter. They are citing a “lack of reporting” by police agencies, which is definitely NOT a premeditated sabotage by democrat controlled cities, states, and federal law enforcement, right?
They did this in France and Sweden. Eventually, all the useful data will dry up. “Official sources” will report only party-approved data, and nationalists will magically become the most dangerous demo overnight.
At some point it doesn't matter whether or not the statistic applies to the individual because the risk/reward ratio is skewed to the point od unsustainability.
"Stereotypes" have a much higher predictive value than theories produced by Social scientists, yet only the latter are agressively used by governments and institutions as rationale to exert control over people's lives.
Stereotypes are among the most reproducible of all social phenomena, yes, but it’s not a 1.0 coefficient. Some stereotypes are really media/academic creations that are better understood as blood libel against certain targets groups. The one that immediately springs to mind is the “southern incest” trope that northerners love to throw at rural southern Americans. In reality, no one can touch the incest rates of pakastanis and other middle eastern populations, but it is politically incorrect to discuss it - let alone mock it. So Alabama and company get saddled with the “brother-fucker lol” meme while a Somalian in congress was literally married to her brother.
Portrayal of the south as backwards was used as justification for the North invading and subjugating it and carpetbaggers later economically exploiting it. I would compare it less to "blood libel" propaganda and more to the way Afghanistan was portrayed as a terrorist-producing anti-woman Islamic State backwater. GAE gonna do what GAE do: the propaganda precedes the bloody profiteering.
And this is exactly the attitude you're seeing here directed at Florida: DC-centric shills, or whatever kind of New England degenerates they are, are reducing Floridians to bumpkins that beat up "trans kids" for sport.
Washington Post is so predictable. I fully expect them to be the first to publish some headline like “what’s wrong with sharing your love with a 13 year old”
They will frame it as being white Christian colonialism enforcing their evil moral values on the world. They can even give examples on how it is accepted in some cultures and who is to say if a culture is better or worse. We already know that according to leftists any culture that is white or Christian is evil and needs to be removed as an influence so it's not hard to go from here to full pedophilia.
If the time comes I just hope there are still enough good men that care enough to fight it. If anything it may finally unite people regardless of ethnicity or religion.
I am barely hearing that term but I am hearing so you are right. I'm sure that it will be a thing in the near future. I can remember thinking it was ridiculous to think that a man believing he was a woman made him a woman.
florida's law has nothing to do with LGBT. it simply bans sex education to children 8 and under without consent of a parent. this is in response to actual pedophile grooming incidents that happened in california under the guise of "sex education", as well as an attempt that surreptitiously happened in florida. when the parents found out in florida, the pedophile supporting school board members attacked the parents and threatened to send CPS after them to take their kids.
and none of that has anything to do with biological males beating women in sports. if you support biological males beating the shit out of women, you hate women. washington post simply wants to see women have the shit kicked out of them.
imagine thinking allowing people to force sex education on unconsenting children and unconsenting parents is somehow anti-LGBT... the people complaining are all pedos.
Well the title I put is not the tittle they use.
The original title is:
Laws targeting transgender youths lean on myths about White childhood innocence
So considering that children are innocent and that transgenderism in kids is not something that should be encouraged at best and grooming at worse is white supremacy.
Still incredibly fucked up but they are trying to make it seem like white people are anti-trans, like there is any other race out there that is pro-trans in little kids.
Honestly the entire world, regardless of religion or race should unite against the monsters pushing this crap on to kids.
Laws targeting transgender youths lean on myths about White childhood innocence
Yes? Because Whites are the only race who have figured out that their children are the single highest good of a people and must be protected at all costs? Still sounds like they're admitting White supremacy makes a lot of sense.
I believe the translation on that is: If you think that shit was better when you were a kid (<- most people think this), it's white supremacy. The likes that read WaPo love to be reminded that they are supremacists.
Tyson wishes his swings had this much reach, holy shit.
nope. not at all born out by the fact that US census data shows black males aged 13-45 are only 3% of the US population, but FBI crime stats show they commit over 50% of all crime in the country. nope nope nope.
If I recall correctly, those were specifically violent crimes.
Also, the govt did not count unsolved murder cases, which account for 40% of all murder cases and are almost entirely gang related aka blacks killing other blacks. So the true number is closer to 3/70.
Imagine living in a society where 3% of the population commits 70% of the murders, but no one can talk about it publicly and the perpetrator demographic is actually a protected class.
The stereotype isn't even relevant to the discussion.
Tyson isn't being refered to in the trans athletes conversation because he's black or violent, he's being referred to in the trans athletes conversation because there there is simply no woman on earth, past or present, who could ever hold a fucking candle to him.
That's what makes this avenue of argumentation from WaPo so fucking moronic.
The govt has literally stopped reporting those crime stats btw. As of this quarter. They are citing a “lack of reporting” by police agencies, which is definitely NOT a premeditated sabotage by democrat controlled cities, states, and federal law enforcement, right?
They did this in France and Sweden. Eventually, all the useful data will dry up. “Official sources” will report only party-approved data, and nationalists will magically become the most dangerous demo overnight.
Well every stereotype has some element of truth. All black boys aren’t criminals but as you correctly point out the stats show quite a few are.
At some point it doesn't matter whether or not the statistic applies to the individual because the risk/reward ratio is skewed to the point od unsustainability.
I get that. Sucks for me but I can understand the risk/reward mindset.
"Stereotypes" have a much higher predictive value than theories produced by Social scientists, yet only the latter are agressively used by governments and institutions as rationale to exert control over people's lives.
Good point. Never thought about it that way.
Stereotypes are among the most reproducible of all social phenomena, yes, but it’s not a 1.0 coefficient. Some stereotypes are really media/academic creations that are better understood as blood libel against certain targets groups. The one that immediately springs to mind is the “southern incest” trope that northerners love to throw at rural southern Americans. In reality, no one can touch the incest rates of pakastanis and other middle eastern populations, but it is politically incorrect to discuss it - let alone mock it. So Alabama and company get saddled with the “brother-fucker lol” meme while a Somalian in congress was literally married to her brother.
Portrayal of the south as backwards was used as justification for the North invading and subjugating it and carpetbaggers later economically exploiting it. I would compare it less to "blood libel" propaganda and more to the way Afghanistan was portrayed as a terrorist-producing anti-woman Islamic State backwater. GAE gonna do what GAE do: the propaganda precedes the bloody profiteering.
And this is exactly the attitude you're seeing here directed at Florida: DC-centric shills, or whatever kind of New England degenerates they are, are reducing Floridians to bumpkins that beat up "trans kids" for sport.
Absolutely, and it is laughable to see some people get offended that stereotypes exist. I break quite a few but conform to some. It is what it is.
Of course you can't point out factual things about non-whites.
Washington Post is so predictable. I fully expect them to be the first to publish some headline like “what’s wrong with sharing your love with a 13 year old”
They will frame it as being white Christian colonialism enforcing their evil moral values on the world. They can even give examples on how it is accepted in some cultures and who is to say if a culture is better or worse. We already know that according to leftists any culture that is white or Christian is evil and needs to be removed as an influence so it's not hard to go from here to full pedophilia.
If the time comes I just hope there are still enough good men that care enough to fight it. If anything it may finally unite people regardless of ethnicity or religion.
Totally agree because I see it coming
MAP is going to be the next letter of the degeneracy alphabet people.
You know what they say, maps go on the wall.
I am barely hearing that term but I am hearing so you are right. I'm sure that it will be a thing in the near future. I can remember thinking it was ridiculous to think that a man believing he was a woman made him a woman.
this article is stretching so hard.
florida's law has nothing to do with LGBT. it simply bans sex education to children 8 and under without consent of a parent. this is in response to actual pedophile grooming incidents that happened in california under the guise of "sex education", as well as an attempt that surreptitiously happened in florida. when the parents found out in florida, the pedophile supporting school board members attacked the parents and threatened to send CPS after them to take their kids.
and none of that has anything to do with biological males beating women in sports. if you support biological males beating the shit out of women, you hate women. washington post simply wants to see women have the shit kicked out of them.
Quite frankly, the law doesn't go far enough.
Well LGBTQP+ are the ones who want to force sex education on small children. So it is against them.
imagine thinking allowing people to force sex education on unconsenting children and unconsenting parents is somehow anti-LGBT... the people complaining are all pedos.
White Supremacy appears to be the most reasonable choice then? Weird flex but OK.
Well the title I put is not the tittle they use. The original title is:
So considering that children are innocent and that transgenderism in kids is not something that should be encouraged at best and grooming at worse is white supremacy.
Still incredibly fucked up but they are trying to make it seem like white people are anti-trans, like there is any other race out there that is pro-trans in little kids.
Honestly the entire world, regardless of religion or race should unite against the monsters pushing this crap on to kids.
Yes? Because Whites are the only race who have figured out that their children are the single highest good of a people and must be protected at all costs? Still sounds like they're admitting White supremacy makes a lot of sense.
John Money has entered the chat
He is most likely in hell, I think they still use DSL down there.
I believe the translation on that is: If you think that shit was better when you were a kid (<- most people think this), it's white supremacy. The likes that read WaPo love to be reminded that they are supremacists.
They've been making a strong case for its moral righteousness for a while now.
Yes. Yes, it is. Everyone else can fuck right off.
Imagine believing we live in a world that promotes white reproductive supremacy -- two parent families