Doubt. Although I do concur that some amount of exploiting the population for billions of dollars is certainly going on.
However, the facts are out. This was a power grab to drive the Great Reset to gain Europe's old money stronger control over all Western governments. They are going to wipe out your wealth, your savings, your investments. They are going to move you into pods and feed you industrial waste. They are going to remove all of your ability to exercise your free will: remove your freedom.
If it was about money, they would have all cashed in on Moderna at 500 and let it all fall apart after Omicron instead of trying to pump it back up from 160 as it breaks every resistance level like a bad crypto.
People would have been happy to go back to normal and they could have re-invested the gains into reopening stocks. The elite would have gotten a free pass, nobody would care about Covid because it would now be over.
The fact that it isn't proves that the intentions behind this are much darker.
This info was weeks old even before 'Joe Rogan Got Annihilated' for saying the same thing. The only widespread news about it was unsentient zoomers and libshit women sharing links of this Australian cunt asserting the very opposite, on Rogan's show. Not even Rogan knew the link to the Nature paper and merely allowed himself to get bamboozled, which would beg some questions about wtf he's playing at if I didn't already know how retarded he is. The cattlebrained fleshlumps that comprise most of this species have already filed this news under 'Do Not Absorb Under Any Circumstances', as per tribal mandate.
Facts are finished with. I stopped saving most info to my vaccine news folder months ago. Act appropriately.
In 2018 she worked with Nature and Estée Lauder Companies to launch a global award for women in science. She became the first ever woman editor-in-chief of Nature in its 150-year history in May 2018.
They seem to get these positions just before they need them, I swear. A year to gain credibility then bury the truth for the agenda.
If the truth came out about how skewed the rate is - the figures for the vaccine would start to look deliberate.
They need to pretend that the virus causes it, because they need to hide the truth. They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
The FDA and CDC know exactly what happened - the resignations were people who couldn't stand what they knew.
The genius behind the Novavax vaccine is not so much in its traditional use of a viral protein subunit but in its use of a saponin adjuvant. Saponins provoke an immune response, but through anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, prevent an over-inflammatory response. In doing so, this phytochemical likely eliminates or greatly reduces the chances of either myocarditis or immune thrombocytopenia (blood clotting).
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
Why under 5s
MRNA needs a catalyst to rise for the short squeeze attempt. Too many wrongthinkers have jumped on the train to kill this company and the remaining holders will try a mass buy to margin call everyone who bought in up to $210.
Think GME, but backed by the likes of Citigroup and Bank of America.
They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
Which ingredients are those?
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
A company's marketing claims shouldn't exactly be taken on face value. Besides, Novavax claims that this use is not 'traditional' in vaccines. So vaccines have always been a plot to kill you?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible, it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible. It ties up everything else I've said neatly.
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?
If the authors separate men 16-24 from 12-15 and 25-40, it would likely look worst in 16-24 age group.
But it's worse than that. They should have broken down the heart problems in infected by vaccinated and unvaccinated.
They did say that previous infection didn't cause the vaccine to be worse on the heart, but they didn't test whether the vaccine caused the infection to be worse. With two things that damage the heart how could they not magnify each other? It seems like some people should have gotten mild heart damage from the infection that turned mild damage from vaccine into serious problems. There should be some pile on effect from having both if they're both causing a range of damage.
One possibility is that the infection heart problems were caused by the vaccine, but simply went undetected until stress from the covid. In that case infection wouldn't magnify the vaccine risk, and that's consistent with what they found in this research.
Lick. The. Fucking. BOOT!
Power. They want everyone to take the shot, they don't care if it works or not. You will OBEY!
I’ll just lay out the facts to why.
Trump gave prefunded carte Blanche for the “vaccines”. Bureaucracy used this to profit their agenda.
Media has spun “vax or die”.
This keeps bureaucracy active for the next generations. Create the problem and sell the “solution”
Profit
Doubt. Although I do concur that some amount of exploiting the population for billions of dollars is certainly going on.
However, the facts are out. This was a power grab to drive the Great Reset to gain Europe's old money stronger control over all Western governments. They are going to wipe out your wealth, your savings, your investments. They are going to move you into pods and feed you industrial waste. They are going to remove all of your ability to exercise your free will: remove your freedom.
Intentionally trying to reduce the male population?
Not too loud, janitors are watching.
Because money. It's all about money.
If it was about money, they would have all cashed in on Moderna at 500 and let it all fall apart after Omicron instead of trying to pump it back up from 160 as it breaks every resistance level like a bad crypto.
People would have been happy to go back to normal and they could have re-invested the gains into reopening stocks. The elite would have gotten a free pass, nobody would care about Covid because it would now be over.
The fact that it isn't proves that the intentions behind this are much darker.
When it falls apart the narrative of 'eberyone needs vacc to stop the pandemic' ends, and the whole contrived scheme falls apart.
Thats why they will never admit it... for as long as the populace allows them to..
This info was weeks old even before 'Joe Rogan Got Annihilated' for saying the same thing. The only widespread news about it was unsentient zoomers and libshit women sharing links of this Australian cunt asserting the very opposite, on Rogan's show. Not even Rogan knew the link to the Nature paper and merely allowed himself to get bamboozled, which would beg some questions about wtf he's playing at if I didn't already know how retarded he is. The cattlebrained fleshlumps that comprise most of this species have already filed this news under 'Do Not Absorb Under Any Circumstances', as per tribal mandate.
Facts are finished with. I stopped saving most info to my vaccine news folder months ago. Act appropriately.
Won't get your penis cut off huh? Well, here, have a heart attack.
There's a reason they didn't use the correct figure for SARS-Cov2
They seem to get these positions just before they need them, I swear. A year to gain credibility then bury the truth for the agenda.
If the truth came out about how skewed the rate is - the figures for the vaccine would start to look deliberate.
They need to pretend that the virus causes it, because they need to hide the truth. They deliberately used certain ingredients that would provoke this.
The FDA and CDC know exactly what happened - the resignations were people who couldn't stand what they knew.
https://archive.is/mvuMj
Unless someone can prove this wrong, this obscure investor report on Novavax is the smoking gun on the other companies.
MRNA needs a catalyst to rise for the short squeeze attempt. Too many wrongthinkers have jumped on the train to kill this company and the remaining holders will try a mass buy to margin call everyone who bought in up to $210.
Think GME, but backed by the likes of Citigroup and Bank of America.
Which ingredients are those?
A company's marketing claims shouldn't exactly be taken on face value. Besides, Novavax claims that this use is not 'traditional' in vaccines. So vaccines have always been a plot to kill you?
Do I look like I work for Pfizer?
That's why I said unless it can be proven wrong. It sounds plausible, it gives a way for the deliberate engineering to cause myocarditis to be possible. It ties up everything else I've said neatly.
Well, you claimed to know not just about 'certain ingredients', but also that they 'deliberately' used them.
So that comment of yours was BS?
That's not how the burden of proof works. Novavax is supposed to prove its claims. And frankly, if I had to choose between Novavax and Pfizer, I'd choose the latter at this moment - because it's had 1+ years of massive use, while the same is not true for Novavax.
Even if Novavax's claims are correct, which they may be, it refutes that claim of yours. Because Novavax is claiming an innovation - it changed the vaccine from the way they are normally made, not Pfizer. So how did Pfizer 'deliberately engineer' it to kill you?
But it's worse than that. They should have broken down the heart problems in infected by vaccinated and unvaccinated.
They did say that previous infection didn't cause the vaccine to be worse on the heart, but they didn't test whether the vaccine caused the infection to be worse. With two things that damage the heart how could they not magnify each other? It seems like some people should have gotten mild heart damage from the infection that turned mild damage from vaccine into serious problems. There should be some pile on effect from having both if they're both causing a range of damage.
One possibility is that the infection heart problems were caused by the vaccine, but simply went undetected until stress from the covid. In that case infection wouldn't magnify the vaccine risk, and that's consistent with what they found in this research.
It's so the left can create a new disability group of men with weak hearts weaker than women in wheelchairs to be another voting wing.
I doubt they'll vote for the people who tried to kill them.