Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

40
Live Now: Supreme Court Oral Arguments Over OSHA Vax Mandate (www.supremecourt.gov)
posted 4 years ago by Booker 4 years ago by Booker +40 / -0
29 comments share
29 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (29)
sorted by:
▲ 28 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 28 points 4 years ago +28 / -0

It would be nice if the conservatives on the court were actually conservatives. As it stands we all know Chief Justice Cuckold and his merry band of communists will rubber stamp the mandate no matter what, so we need unanimity from the rest to strike it down.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– onetruephilosoraptor 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Sean Marotta is a lawyer who is pro-mandate and works as outside counsel for the American Hospital Association.

He did a extensive play by play commentary of the oral arguments and he actually expects the court to issue a stay for the OSHA mandate as a majority of the judges seem to find the OSHA mandate to be overbroad and focuses on every industry instead of focusing on only "high risk" industries which Justice Roberts gave an example of meatpacking factory workers working side by side or the example of health care workers.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1479465947874398212.html

Apparently even Roberts thinks Congress needs to give authorization explicitly and that OSHA cannot unilaterally force this upon the country with no action from Congress.

We won't obviously know if this interpretation of the oral arguments is right until the decision comes out but looking at this analysis, we might have a chance to get a ruling staying the OSHA mandate in its current form.

The bad news is that healthcare workers and factory workers working side by side might still be fucked though since it seems that Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett would be okay with a more specific OSHA rule focusing solely on "high risk" industries.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– deleted 15 points 4 years ago +15 / -0
▲ 11 ▼
– Booker [S] 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

Perhaps. I missed it. The government has an incredibly weak case here though. And there's tremendous pushback in amicus briefs, some of which are well authored and attack the mandate from all kinds of angles, and the court will have to process those arguments too.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– deleted 14 points 4 years ago +14 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– Booker [S] 20 points 4 years ago +20 / -0

Oh. My. God. She and Sotomayor couldn't be more ignorant.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– Kaarous 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

They're both frauds. Kagan is just Obama's pet lesbian, and the other one should have been deported decades ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– deleted 12 points 4 years ago +12 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– Booker [S] 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0

I'm catching up to Kagan's "questions" at the start of the hearing... Good lord... She's just lecturing, and every statement she's making is wrong.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 10 ▼
– Booker [S] 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Welp we know Breyer's vote. That's three in the can for upholding the mandates, but I guess they weren't a surprise.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Assassin47 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

Imagine all the crazy yelling between them in Spanish if Trump had picked Barbara Lagoa for the seat. I like to imagine she would have been arguing the other side.

But no, he had to choose that other Catholic woman who will probably go with the government to protect the childrens.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Booker [S] 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

I'd still hate fuck her

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

We knew before she opened her whore mouth.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– deleted 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– Booker [S] 17 points 4 years ago +17 / -0

Then you want to kill the wrong person

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– deleted 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– FuckGenderPolitics 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

They post them online, so you can listen later if you're really curious. I forget exactly where they post them, but I did a paper in undergrad that involved listening to oral arguments of a SCOTUS case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Tourgen 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

This smells like theatre. The absolute terror the chief justices must feel right now. They have to put on a good show.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bahariye 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I couldn't care less what the Supreme Court rules. My body my choice. I am past caring.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– bamboozler1 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Serious question, preferably seeking serious replies: what do we, here, think will happen if they fail to overturn it..?

I honestly don’t have much hope for the cowards on this court to do the right thing, here…

Nor do I hold much hope that things actually explode (metaphorically, of course), if that DOES end up being the ruling…

So… Thoughts?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Booker [S] 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

We fall back on our federalist system of governance, whereby states either do or do not assert their own workplace rules for mandatory vaccinations. My state passed laws on this months ago, which unfortunately has not effected federal employees, but has protected other private workers. Other states have done the same.

We are too big and too diverse a country at this point to even dream of applying single rules to every single citizen across every single state, as delegated from the federal government. This is where state governments shine and differentiate themselves, and increasingly we will divorce ourselves from federal authority. They have the illusion of power, which is not the same as actually possessing it. We saw this effect play out when Trump tried to penalize sanctuary cities, and the cities just said fuck off.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Tourgen 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

I don't expect anyone will do anything.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy