As soon as that happened I knew it would become a shitshow.
Idiot "conservatives" and moderates who don't pay attention will continue propping Rumble up and hyping it, hoping that this time it will be different.
It won't.
They'll make some hail mary to keep investor confidence and people engaged, and then after the stock opens publicly they'll slowly push towards leftist bullshit to get more investment. It's inevitable.
The question is, if it's true is it still hate speech and should be banned?
That allows for criminal cartels to do whatever they want and say it's illegal to point it out.
Imagine if it was illegal to point out the actions of the Italian or Mexican mafia because it suggested all Italians or Mexicans were bad.
My "hate speech" is directed towards a small group of people with billions of dollars who own most of these media and banking organizations, and it's frustrating they always try and make it like you are attacking everyone.
Barnes' take on politics is through a meter thick pair of rose tinted boomer goggles.
He's the kind of guy who looks at a failing company and thinks you can fix everything by changing the management, after the successful core staff that held the business together and did all the actual work walked.
The CEO seemed like a nice enough guy, but he was a terrible interview and didn't give a single answer that detailed a specific plan and inspired confidence.
The entire two hour stream could be summed up as "We are committed to free speech as a company. However, our only actionable plan on that front is to intend on keeping the Terms of Service frozen as a 2013 version"
I did find it weird to see Barnes acting like a shill and making excuses for Rumble rather than doing some probing.
Fuck Rumble
As soon as that happened I knew it would become a shitshow.
Idiot "conservatives" and moderates who don't pay attention will continue propping Rumble up and hyping it, hoping that this time it will be different.
It won't.
They'll make some hail mary to keep investor confidence and people engaged, and then after the stock opens publicly they'll slowly push towards leftist bullshit to get more investment. It's inevitable.
wasn't rumble in the process of shutting down before all this influx of $$$? if not, which social media/video site was it that was shutting down?
Rumble seems like the bad guy to me.
I look to see them both fail or become propaganda ala Youtub within the year.
The question is, if it's true is it still hate speech and should be banned?
That allows for criminal cartels to do whatever they want and say it's illegal to point it out.
Imagine if it was illegal to point out the actions of the Italian or Mexican mafia because it suggested all Italians or Mexicans were bad.
My "hate speech" is directed towards a small group of people with billions of dollars who own most of these media and banking organizations, and it's frustrating they always try and make it like you are attacking everyone.
Barnes really discredited himself with the debate vs. Nick Fuentes.
You might appreciate his legal opinions but you should take his political opinions with a grain of salt.
Barnes' take on politics is through a meter thick pair of rose tinted boomer goggles.
He's the kind of guy who looks at a failing company and thinks you can fix everything by changing the management, after the successful core staff that held the business together and did all the actual work walked.
The CEO seemed like a nice enough guy, but he was a terrible interview and didn't give a single answer that detailed a specific plan and inspired confidence.
The entire two hour stream could be summed up as "We are committed to free speech as a company. However, our only actionable plan on that front is to intend on keeping the Terms of Service frozen as a 2013 version"
I did find it weird to see Barnes acting like a shill and making excuses for Rumble rather than doing some probing.
Why did you find that weird?
His and his partner's revenue stream is through Locals, which is under the same company.