Also, I will stand by for you to pick up guns and kick off the revolution. Oh what's that, impotent bitching and bucket crabbing in a completely irrelevant corner of the internet that you have been relegated to by feminists is the best you can do? Well at least something something fedora, right
Nine times out of ten, when a woman rapes or molests a child, it is never charged, and often not even reported. Think about how many hundreds of female teachers alone have actually been proven to have sexually abused underage students, usually boys, and then multiply that by an exponent equal to how much money teachers unions spend protecting pedophiles.
And that's not even accounting for family members, babysitters and other women in positions of trust. This is the untold story of child abuse that is studiously ignored by media, politics and simps who would prefer not to think of it as abuse when a woman does it.
The same applies to other crimes that women commit. For example, I run a store. Official statistics state that men and women are guilty of shoplifting at roughly equivalent rates. However, nine out of ten shoplifters I catch are female, and it's not because I'm going out of my way to target them. It's just that they get away with it more everywhere else because people are naturally inclined to treat women with less suspicion than they do men.
What a moronic cartoon, but then again, it's to be expected from the batshit crazy MRA/MGTOW and assorted pathetic weasels.
I'll pick out just two. Should government strengthen the rights of divorced women? Of course, people will always answer 'yes' if you ask them about strengthening rights. The same people would probably answer yes if you asked them about strenghtening thet rights of divorced men.
And feminism succeeding because they're rude, repulsive and disgusting. No. They succeed because identitarian ideologues control the levers of power. You might as well be stupid and think that BLM succeeded because it's violent and because it rioted. What would happen if the other side rioted? Well, we found out - then suddenly the power centers are not shilling for you, and you get railroaded.
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea and entirely bad/evil goal to have? Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea
Yes, group rights are a cancer. IDPol is a cancer. There should be no organizations campaigning for the particularistic interests of one group.
Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
I think it's like feminism, where there may be places where men are treated unfairly, but people whack out like Paul Elam.
I suppose you are entitled to think retarded thoughts
Apparently, you're too dumb to refute even 'retarded' ideas.
Uhuh, did the feminists, that you once again are totally unlike, tell you he is mean and wrong
No, he himself said that he would vote to acquit a rapist even if he was convinced of the guy's guilt. Though for you, that is probably more of a feature than a bug.
Maaaan, the left can't meme.
The MRAs I know do literally none of this.
Also, I will stand by for you to pick up guns and kick off the revolution. Oh what's that, impotent bitching and bucket crabbing in a completely irrelevant corner of the internet that you have been relegated to by feminists is the best you can do? Well at least something something fedora, right
I think this one was for you
Even when you call women 'holes' and 'breeding units' you'll still end up sounding politically correct.
The only reason you can call them that is because you're as in denial about crime stats as the average BLM supporter.
All those rapes and child molestations are carried out at the behest of wahmen?
Nine times out of ten, when a woman rapes or molests a child, it is never charged, and often not even reported. Think about how many hundreds of female teachers alone have actually been proven to have sexually abused underage students, usually boys, and then multiply that by an exponent equal to how much money teachers unions spend protecting pedophiles.
And that's not even accounting for family members, babysitters and other women in positions of trust. This is the untold story of child abuse that is studiously ignored by media, politics and simps who would prefer not to think of it as abuse when a woman does it.
The same applies to other crimes that women commit. For example, I run a store. Official statistics state that men and women are guilty of shoplifting at roughly equivalent rates. However, nine out of ten shoplifters I catch are female, and it's not because I'm going out of my way to target them. It's just that they get away with it more everywhere else because people are naturally inclined to treat women with less suspicion than they do men.
If you want to be secretive just call them your other halves and don’t say when they’re the other half of.
What a moronic cartoon, but then again, it's to be expected from the batshit crazy MRA/MGTOW and assorted pathetic weasels.
I'll pick out just two. Should government strengthen the rights of divorced women? Of course, people will always answer 'yes' if you ask them about strengthening rights. The same people would probably answer yes if you asked them about strenghtening thet rights of divorced men.
And feminism succeeding because they're rude, repulsive and disgusting. No. They succeed because identitarian ideologues control the levers of power. You might as well be stupid and think that BLM succeeded because it's violent and because it rioted. What would happen if the other side rioted? Well, we found out - then suddenly the power centers are not shilling for you, and you get railroaded.
Don't listen to morons.
I think this one was for you
but then again, it can just be you having shit for brains.
It's criticizing MRAs from the perspective that their goals are good.
Goals like... rights of men
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea and entirely bad/evil goal to have? Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
Yes, group rights are a cancer. IDPol is a cancer. There should be no organizations campaigning for the particularistic interests of one group.
I think it's like feminism, where there may be places where men are treated unfairly, but people whack out like Paul Elam.
I suppose you are entitled to think retarded thoughts
Uhuh, did the feminists, that you once again are totally unlike, tell you he is mean and wrong
Here is another one for you, because you are a dickhead that thinks he is saying something new
Apparently, you're too dumb to refute even 'retarded' ideas.
No, he himself said that he would vote to acquit a rapist even if he was convinced of the guy's guilt. Though for you, that is probably more of a feature than a bug.
I'm just not dumb enough to try or bother
you really should stop listening and believing feminists, mr not a feminist.