Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea and entirely bad/evil goal to have? Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea
Yes, group rights are a cancer. IDPol is a cancer. There should be no organizations campaigning for the particularistic interests of one group.
Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
I think it's like feminism, where there may be places where men are treated unfairly, but people whack out like Paul Elam.
I think this one was for you
but then again, it can just be you having shit for brains.
It's criticizing MRAs from the perspective that their goals are good.
Goals like... rights of men
Would you say rights of women are a preposterous idea and entirely bad/evil goal to have? Or are you going to go the Totally-Not-A-Feminist™ route of "advocating for men's rights is a bad goal, because mens already have all the rights there can be had"
Yes, group rights are a cancer. IDPol is a cancer. There should be no organizations campaigning for the particularistic interests of one group.
I think it's like feminism, where there may be places where men are treated unfairly, but people whack out like Paul Elam.
I suppose you are entitled to think retarded thoughts
Uhuh, did the feminists, that you once again are totally unlike, tell you he is mean and wrong
Here is another one for you, because you are a dickhead that thinks he is saying something new