Genuine criminals that through their negligence and/or ignorance are making decisions that negatively impact other peoples lives to the point of ruin. At this point you have no excuse anymore. The information is out there, history lessons are available everywhere, yet people are still making decisions to support disastrous and hypocritical Dem policies. Drunk on their own smugness, they still get into the voting booth and crash the economy with no survivors. Fucking assholes.
Sorry, Im not sure what im getting at with this post but Ive been seeing a lot of "Stop the Recall" (CA Governor Gavin Newsom) signs lately and its been really getting on my nerves. Nobody who pays even the slightest amount of attention should be defending Newsom, so they're either not paying attention or they're just self-centered scum who dont care what happens to others. Either way I hate them
Oh contarrie money frar. I was severely abused and haven't voted democrat more than a couple times, and those were all individuals, never straight-party tickets.
Most democrat voters I've met don't care about real world problems, only the make believe solutions to past problems. They are stuck in a world of mommy and daddy making things better and nightmares being struck down by a big man with a good heart. Hollywood/fairytale true believers. The terminally ignorant.
The rest, privileged cunts who never had any real problems who just want to take from the rest of us because they can.
"Abused people are democrats" doesn't logically follow from "democrats are abused people", and if I were more of a nerd I'd remember the name of that particular fallacy.
It's the whole all bears are mammals but not all mammals are bears thing.
I dont think its abuse at all. I think its the exact opposite, these are affluent, middle-upper class people where the only abuse they suffered as children was getting the black Porsche 911 instead of the red one. Their thinking comes from a place of extreme privilege, because they never have to suffer the policies they vote for, while looking down on the people who do. They're people who've never suffered abuse their entire lives
Once whites learn that tribalism and blood are more important than their pathetic ideals of equality, we can finally take back our birthright.
"Equal" is a false idol, and it always has been.
Discrimination is one of the foundations of intelligence, the ability to say A does not equal B.
The moment you acquiesce to the lie that all people are equal when they're not, in the name of not hurting their feelings, you have committed to sure destruction. It's a prioritization of people over truth, the inverse of what should be (truth over people). The first casualty is truth and the second is inevitably people.
The universe, all of truth, all the laws and logic, and what it means, were laid down upon creation, immutable, and only then could life spring forth. Is it any wonder that when you reverse the creation of the universe that it ultimately leads to destruction and death?
Just like you did 101 years ago when you let white women vote?
The local news is starting to pump 'Look how much the recall is costing you!' stories and other things attempting to make the argument that the recall is a pointless waste of money.
I have family (not all of them) who support this guy, but it is totally tribal. The 'noble centrist' I know isn't for Newsom, he's against Trump and Hicks and The South and the stereotype he's bought into that the right is full of dangerous anti-vaxxers who don't take the virus seriously, and.. ..agh, it's tiring. He equates them with 'Frat Bros' who are the deepest purveyors of sin in his worldview, for some reason. This justifies supporting people he doesn't like as a twisted sort of self defense.
He's backed himself into a corner where he's attempted to argue people exercising their freedom of choice with masks and vaccines impedes on other's people right to life, therefore these terrible people need to be fined and imprisoned and he's held that line for over a year. He tells me the real estate market in our area in southern California will explode in value in five years or less, and yet in the same breath worry about the 'Next Variant'. The inflation blindspot is significant, but then he reads the economist so I'm not surprised.
He's been quiet lately, though. I think he's ashamed or feeling a bit lost and not knowing where to turn, and there's more people out there then it first seems. The only thing he's told me recently about politics is that 'all politicians suck!'. I think his faction of people turning bitter and/or apathetic is part of why the polls for the recall are what they are - the left's hysterics are losing steam among 'the middle'. IE: The soft leftists who will never call themselves that and claim they're moderates.
It's both.
Gonna keep saying it. We need RICO treason charges for every elected and party official and Media supporter of the Democrat party.
I no longer view most of the West Coast cities and the entire NE US States, instead I view them as enemy territory. I will not visit there, and frankly I don't care what happens to people living there.
I am happy for lefties to do their thing. What I hate is that righties have to pay for lefty shit.
You've been brainwashed into demonizing "drunk drivers".
Every stat from an "official" source has been massaged to forward the narrative that "these evil people are intentionally out to kill people therefore anything the system does to them is justified". It is the same techniques that the media uses to push covid hysteria.
Pay attention to the language, note they say "alcohol related" when they give stats. An accident where a passenger is drunk and the driver is sober is counted as alcohol related. Same when a sober driver hits a drunk pedestrian. Fatalities when no tests are done are counted. Suicides are counted.
Sucks to realize youve been lied to your whole life.
People in my area cannot drive safely while sober. Alcohol impairs reaction speed. This isn't hard to figure out.
Don't drive drunk you irresponsible fuckwit.
The conditioning is working because you had an immediate negative emotional reaction to my bringing up questions of the official narrative.
You can read my post again. Ask yourself why you got emotional. What specifically caused the reaction?
Someone, who isn't really looking out for your best interests, has invested heavily in creating an environment where the population has that kind of reaction.
This is exactly what is happening to demonize the "unvaccinated". You can even make the same arguments assuming you believe that covid is the andromeda strain and vaccines have no downsides and perfectly effective.
Do you dispute that alcohol impairs reaction time?
The point
You
Are you really trying to say that drunk driving is a-ok and shouldn't be punished?
Are you literally retarded, or just functionally so?
No amount of stats on how common or uncommon the act of drunk driving is makes it ok you twit. That's like saying murder isn't really that common so we shouldn't punish it so harshly.
I'm saying you need to think a bit deeper before blindly accepting an officially sanctioned narrative. Because of your social conditioning you are having a reflexive emotional reaction when the narrative that "everyone knows" is questioned. And the conditioned response to questioning is anger at the person who caused the conflict because that allows for outright dismissal rather than consideration of unsanctioned ideas.
Read the words of my post and respond to those rather than whatever your imagination created.
I bet you can't even define what you mean by "drunk driving" in a way that the definition can be applied consistently and logically for enforcement.
Drunk driving is driving with a blood alcohol content above that of .08% or whatever number your state has set. It's the definition used for consistent enforcement. There's no need for "social conditioning" to think drunk driving is a bad idea and shouldn't be legal, just get drunk once.
This is the dumbest conspiracy theory I have ever seen.
So why are people punished for this reason and not driving when they haven't slept enough, or after an argument with his wife, or after lifting heavy, or after a boxing match?
Why are old people allowed to drive at all since their reflexes normally are worse than most younger people even at .15 bac? Why are women allowed to drive at all since the average woman is worse than the average man at every driving task according to any objective standards?
The answer is we aren't punishing people for driving badly, we are punishing them for drinking. However there isn't any social push for prohibition. So instead the neo-prohibitionists use the wedge issue of traffic fatalities to carve out this one area of law where they can demonize and use the system to harm mostly working class men.
Because you can't measure those things you dingus. You can measure drunkenness using BAC.
Also, we do take old people's driving licenses away when they have been proven to not be fit to drive. Your ignorance is simply staggering.