Genuine criminals that through their negligence and/or ignorance are making decisions that negatively impact other peoples lives to the point of ruin. At this point you have no excuse anymore. The information is out there, history lessons are available everywhere, yet people are still making decisions to support disastrous and hypocritical Dem policies. Drunk on their own smugness, they still get into the voting booth and crash the economy with no survivors. Fucking assholes.
Sorry, Im not sure what im getting at with this post but Ive been seeing a lot of "Stop the Recall" (CA Governor Gavin Newsom) signs lately and its been really getting on my nerves. Nobody who pays even the slightest amount of attention should be defending Newsom, so they're either not paying attention or they're just self-centered scum who dont care what happens to others. Either way I hate them
Are you really trying to say that drunk driving is a-ok and shouldn't be punished?
Are you literally retarded, or just functionally so?
No amount of stats on how common or uncommon the act of drunk driving is makes it ok you twit. That's like saying murder isn't really that common so we shouldn't punish it so harshly.
I'm saying you need to think a bit deeper before blindly accepting an officially sanctioned narrative. Because of your social conditioning you are having a reflexive emotional reaction when the narrative that "everyone knows" is questioned. And the conditioned response to questioning is anger at the person who caused the conflict because that allows for outright dismissal rather than consideration of unsanctioned ideas.
Read the words of my post and respond to those rather than whatever your imagination created.
I bet you can't even define what you mean by "drunk driving" in a way that the definition can be applied consistently and logically for enforcement.
Drunk driving is driving with a blood alcohol content above that of .08% or whatever number your state has set. It's the definition used for consistent enforcement. There's no need for "social conditioning" to think drunk driving is a bad idea and shouldn't be legal, just get drunk once.
This is the dumbest conspiracy theory I have ever seen.
So why are people punished for this reason and not driving when they haven't slept enough, or after an argument with his wife, or after lifting heavy, or after a boxing match?
Why are old people allowed to drive at all since their reflexes normally are worse than most younger people even at .15 bac? Why are women allowed to drive at all since the average woman is worse than the average man at every driving task according to any objective standards?
The answer is we aren't punishing people for driving badly, we are punishing them for drinking. However there isn't any social push for prohibition. So instead the neo-prohibitionists use the wedge issue of traffic fatalities to carve out this one area of law where they can demonize and use the system to harm mostly working class men.
Because you can't measure those things you dingus. You can measure drunkenness using BAC.
Also, we do take old people's driving licenses away when they have been proven to not be fit to drive. Your ignorance is simply staggering.