Japanese guy puts it well
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (61)
sorted by:
if a foreigner watched Star Trek STD he'd think 90% of Americans were POC
That's not even a joke, even in America there are people who think the black population is 25% or more.
We can start with you. Get in the Helicopter.
Geez I don't even think Damar was that cold. And he hated Bajorans.
Then the Americans shouldn't have shipped the black people now should they?
There's that number again (the percentage of violent crime committed by the 13% of the population constituted by blacks)
I've had this conversation more than a few times before.
That's what most Americans believe.
They’re still trying to make the white minority sell. 10%+ of the US population isn’t even here legally, let alone citizens.
Just wait.
Pretty much every culture is diverse within its own microcosm. Any stability and homogeneity we see in most countries today is only after hundreds or thousands of years of conflict between their minorities, where one became dominant. However the traces of the old cultures are still there, assimilated, and appreciated by the majority. (unless the majority is Islam which wipes out all traces of previous culture)
I don't really know what I'm leading to except to agree with the Japanese guy. That kind of true diversity is what stuff like the Olympics used to celebrate. Every country being their own unique mix of a distinct racial and cultural past.
Globohomo ain't it. Globohomo actually wipes out those interesting organic variations to install approved color-coded diversity quotas and a limited range of acceptable thought. (which varies based on what the corporations and politicians need at any given time)
This. There's a TON of diversity in Japan from local customs to dialects like People from Osaka are known to unashamedly bargain for a lower price. People from Kyoto are aloof and unfriendly to strangers (aloof yes, unfriendly no). Wakayama people are country bumpkins. Regional differences provide a rich source of humor of a kind that is now effectively outlawed in America, where diversity is celebrated but differences must go unmentioned for fear of hurting someone's feelings.
People are still very much free to shit on White southerners though.
Til the stars and bars suddenly and for no reason at all rises again.
It's all good. We shit on damned Yankees, and rightly so.
It's like watching the World Cup now to see which corporation's team of Africans can defeat every other corporation's team of Africans. It's become a farce.
Why have olympics when all teams are gonna be brown with wavy brown hair?
Selling advertising (and pushing race-mixing and homosexuality/tranny propaganda in said advertising)
Marxists can and will exploit that weakness too. Polytheism is perhaps the greatest weakness of all.
Japan is agnostic at best or even pseudo atheist, not many believe in Buddhism legitimately. https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-Pacific/2015/0906/In-non-religious-Japan-the-shrine-can-still-exert-a-pull
its a little contradictory to be praying to things and then saying you are not religious....
Humans aren't consistent.
Japanese tend to be very superstitious. So they may not believe anything while carrying charms and saying prayers for good luck. Many believe in an afterlife while not believing in God. Those that don't still just do the shrine stuff as tradition.
Religion: This is a specific set of organized beliefs and practices, usually shared by a community or group. A religion is a unified system of beliefs and practices relative to sacred things, that is to. say, things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community called a Church, Mosque, Temple or Synagogue.
Spirituality: Connotes an experience of connection to something larger than you; living everyday life in a reverent and sacred manner. Spirituality though, breaks free from the restrictions and rigid structure associated with traditional religion like going to a place of worship on a specific day and dietary restrictions on certain days or even permanently and typically involves volunteerism, social responsibility, optimism, contributing to society and not just through prayer, connectedness with others and love of self/reason to care for self.
Their welfare state and non-existent birth rate will force mass importation of foreigners. Yes, it will be bad for their culture. Not worth considering. It WILL happen. They can eliminate the soon-to-be-bankrupt welfare system or they can increase their birthrate. They will do neither.
BPS did a video on this...Japan basically does a work visa system, with the understanding that those people will have to go home at some point, and can't just live off the system.
But yeah, the welfare ponzi schemes need to end the world over...
How come when someone talks about this cutting the welfare doesn’t cross their mind as an option?
Look at Europe - they imported foreigners, who went on welfare.
How is importing foreigners still a legitimate argument to falling birth rates?
Asian culture is based around the group not the individual so Socialized medicine and welfare are considered good for the betterment of the group and country. Some may think one or both are bad ideas but they'll never voice that opinion publicly due to the possibility of being seen as a 'trouble maker' or a deviant which would kill social relationships and employment opportunities. First rule of Japanese society is don't make waves and don't make trouble for others. The phrase "the nail that sticks out gets hammered down" comes from there, it's 出る釘は打たれる in Japanese.....They also don't have the same single mom and welfare queen problems the west does due to social stigmas and fears becoming an outcast so couple either work it out or they have side guy/girls or go to the local soapland to bang hookers (cheating is semi tolerated and going to a hooker isn't viewed as cheating since it's the hookers job and no feelings are involved) and the couple only fucks to reproduce and for appearances, even the legal system has backed up paid infidelity.
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/japanese-judge-rules-cheating-allowed-17366001
https://japantoday.com/category/national/judge-sets-new-line-for-adultery-in-landmark-case
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/japan-ruling-paying-for-sex-not-adultery-strictly-business/
I was thinking about just this tonight, women entered the workforce in Japan and it caused stagnation of wages and a declining birthrate. Add to this that single women vote for the State as their replacement husband to take care of them. Feminism (of all waves, not just 3rd but even back to 1st) is the globalist's best tool to tear down a nation.
I believe there was a study showing diversity of ideas, or something, politics maybe, within an organization, was beneficial. Racial has been shown time and time again not to be. We were already diverse as far as opinions went, now we are polarized. Racial diversity kills.
The basic problem is not ideology. It is race.
Japan is 99% racially homogenous.
"Japan never had a civil war because it's racially homogeneous, so there wouldn't be any division in the country"
That's what you basically just said with that idiotic statement.
Since Europe is filed with white people, and Africa is filled with black people, and Central America prior to 1492 was filled with Mezo Americans, I'm sure there wasn't any division there either!
TIL the Sengoku Jidai is not real. Or the Genpei War. Or the Onin War. Or the Boshin War. No, Japan totally hasnt fought almost as many civil wars as it has external ones.
But then again, that probably applies to most nations. Maybe Europe had more external than internal wars, but that would be because they are so packed in that they are going to be beating on each other over issues instead of themselves.
Maybe this weird racialism is an American disease of the mind. I genuinely think it comes from Anglo Supremacism where the English smugness mixed with misunderstanding the value of Capitalism, created a pseudo-science of innate superiority in the minds of English decedents; while the American continent itself was heavily ethnically diverse. Perhaps living in an ethnically mixed society has given some Americans a disease of the mind where they think everything would work out if everyone kind of generally looked the same.
You know, like Liberia.
That was basically the whole thought process.
Having had this conversation with a WigNat type before, their argument was that America was founded by White Englishmen, therefore it deserves to remain a nation of White Englishmen, in the same way that England should be English, France should be French, Germany should be German, etc.
The problem is that the United States was not founded on an ethnicity like most of Europe, it was founded on ideology. And by definition, anyone can be part of an ideology. And its why, when you present the option to most people who are even remotely Liberal (as in, they value Liberty like the nation was founded on), they will pick someone who is not the same race as them but holds the same sort of Liberty-based views (your Larry Elders, Thomas Sowells, Andy Ngos, etc) LONG before they accept Richard Spenser type WigNats, even though they are the same race.
Incidentally, I think this is why you have started seeing parents push back and dig in on the topic of CRT: even after all of the Lefts attempts to do otherwise, most people still think they should bve treated the same, and so they are looking at this ideology saying "One of you is superior and an oppressor, one of you is inferior and oppressed" and their response is "You fucking what, mate?"
That was why White Supremacy as an ideology had to be done in the first place. As with German National Socialism, it smoothed over internal ethnic differences, while highlighting ones against "outsiders".
So the Irish have never fully integrated? What about the Scandanavians? How about the Germans? Maybe the Japanese?
While immigrant populations take some aspects of their homeland into their new country, they tend to integrate (as can be seen by the fact that 3rd generation immigrants do not speak their grandparent's language). Even if some of those groups live in isolated communities (as the Germans once did) they do not see their new country as a place for exploitation for their own tribal benefit, but a place where they can live their own lives better.
Or, perhaps you are going to tell me as a 7th generation Lithuanian immigrant, I'm actually just working to dominate America for the inevitable Lithuanian take over.
GamersLithuanians Rise UP!Or at least, I think it might be Lithuania, because no one fucking remembers and we consider ourselves American.
Didn't you call yourself Jewish before on reddit? . A country with diverse groups will always be weaker off . Hell even just a mix of European groups like America would never be as unified or strong as Germany used to be as a single ethnic group with thousands of years of shared history. Do you think diverse groups would have the same loyalty and dedication to their country as Japanese did to theirs when they committed kamikaze attacks?
The point is diversity is not something to strive for. Ever. Especially globalist enforced diversity. And if you argue with this at this point you are just a shill
No, I was called Jewish on Reddit because I disagreed. It's the "everyone who disagrees with me is a Nazi" for Nazis. I took that as a flair of pride.
This example proves you know nothing about the history of Germany or the German peoples. The first time any Germanic peoples were united was under Bismark. For the previous thousand years, they were entirely divided and set against each other. Even Germanic co-operation was relatively rare all the way up to Napolean. Many Germans still do not like Prussians, which are their own cultural and ethnic sub-group of Germans.
Yes. I've read other Silver Star, Navy Cross, and MOH citations that can prove it.
Maybe you've never had anything in your life worth dying for. The rest of us die for family, die for friends, and die for a cause we believe is just. The guy who goes to die with you, by choice (rather than by drugs and propaganda like the Kamikaze), is prepared to do so for the same values that you've chosen. Not because he looks kind of like you.
Idiocy. Genetic diversity is an imperative, otherwise you are arguing for incest at worst, and asexual reproduction at best (which is a shitty form of reproduction).
Diversity exists for a point: it can make a system stronger through being harder to defeat, and being more adaptable.
You literally just made the point we were saying, diversity just creates division that people can exploit. Also India is not homogenous. Their caste system made it so they practically created entire new races after thousands of years of only marrying within their own caste and having their own culture and identity within that caste and heritage is passed from generation to generation . And you can see physical differences between them too. Also the politically incorrect thing to say is that not all races are equal.
Also do you think values is enough to make someone so loyal to their country they would die for it like the Japanese did before with their kamikaze attacks?
India pre-divide was NOT racially homogenous.
India is made up of dozens of racial groups, divided by race and by caste.
They are constantly at each other's throats and the country is absolutely destroyed by the divisions that creates.
Clearly, you have never been to india nor ever opened a book on the subject.
India is the classic diversity basketcase.
i think you are replying to the wrong person or didn't read what i said....i was literally saying those points....
You're missing the fact India still has a social caste system and Northern Indians look down on the Southern Indians and consider them akin to niggers in same sense people called the Irish niggers.
They aren't racially homogeneous though. The Ainu, Ōbeikei, Nivkh, Yamato and Ryukyuans aren't ethnically or even racially the same at all. Obeikei are closer to Pac Islanders, Ainu are closer to Inuit and Nivkh are closer to Asian Russian. Yamato are the largest demographic but even with them there's some contention since there's different looks so some suspect that some Yamato are closer to Chinese in origin and some are closer to Mongolian in origin. There were disagreements about considering the Ryukyuan's are the same as the Yamato, or identify them as an independent but related ethnic group, or as a sub-group that constitutes Japanese ethnicity together with the Yamato but recent genetic studies say the Ryukyuan people share more alleles with the southern Jōmon (16,000–3,000 years ago) hunter-gatherers than the Yamato Japanese, have smaller genetic contributions from Asian continental populations, which supports the dual-structure a widely accepted theory which suggests that the Yamato Japanese are more admixed with Asian agricultural continental people (from the Korean Peninsula) than the Ainu and the Ryukyuan's, with major admixture occurring in and after the Yayoi period (3,000-1,700 years ago).
they are not racially homogenous holy shit. you dont know anything about india
60 million people in America don't speak English as their primary language at home.
Truth.
That's why I've called it: Diversity vs Dissimilarity
Literally: "A house divided against itself cannot stand".
Diversity is necessary in most systems to a small degree because total homogeneity is typically disastrous long term. Any system that is varied is capable of adapting from a decentralized method.
A homogeneous system can only adapt through a coordinated command structure; and normally it takes a significant amount of information before a decision is made to adapt the system as a whole. This is why centralized systems are inherently less efficient than decentralized ones.
Dissimilarity, however, is not workable in any system. It is the destruction of that system. A system where parts are wholly unconnected or not in communication only segregates that system into smaller parts. The best case scenario is that a diverse system responds to dissimilarity by breaking off the dissimilar portion and continuing on as two parallel and incompatible systems. The worst case scenario is that the homogeneous system has an internal dissimilarity that it can't compensate against, and it shatters into dozens of smaller and totally dissimilar parallel systems.
A dissimilar system is inherently logically inconsistent and incommunicable.
Although what I'm saying is vague, it's true in general to basically any system. You can apply it to economies, immune systems, species, sexual reproduction, politics, or even a team workflow.
Homogeneity is inefficient. Diversity is uncontrollable. Dissimilarity is destructive.