Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

31
You know, I used to think she was oddly dignified in how much she seemed to be in control of simps, but after seeing this very pathetic recent video maybe she should actually be banned from the internet just for her own good (twitter.com)
posted 4 years ago by SupremeReader 4 years ago by SupremeReader +31 / -0
59 comments share
59 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (59)
sorted by:
▲ 28 ▼
– MaximumHonk 28 points 4 years ago +28 / -0

For her own good? Nah she knows exactly what she's doing; drowning in simp cash. There's no way she's giving sexual favors to any of these feeble simps and cucked journalists. She can't even hide her disdain when she's in the same room as one.

And she doesn't need to; they'll all support her anyway for woke points/attention whoring.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– JiggsawCalrissian 23 points 4 years ago +23 / -0

The problem is us, men, allowing this to be profitable

permalink save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– deleted 16 points 4 years ago +16 / -0
▲ 21 ▼
– TentElephant 21 points 4 years ago +21 / -0

The lack of enforced monogamy among the hypergamous gender drives lesser men into pararomantic relationships out of desperation for female attention, while women become enslaved to capital accumulation through acts of degradation that makes them undesirable to higher value men, i.e. feminism.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– TentElephant 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

It hurts the available capital for whores, but women as whole end up in the same position as they ultimately control their men's capital.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– TentElephant 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

It hurts Babylonian capital.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– deleted 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– LesboPregnancyScare 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

yep, the state of nonexistent monogamy. In 2007 the year that the smart phone, the first iphone was released, which allowed the general public easy access to the internet, which was formerly the domain of the more tech savvy and those who had the hardware and infrastructure for it.

The availability of internet for the general public and massive social media sites meant that women could fish in a much larger pool. And while women have always desired the top 20% of men, before the internet, a womans pool for male options was her social circle and surrounding area be it her hometown, college town, or area/city she frequently visited. The internet increased a womans option pool to seemingly no limits, maybe the language barrier is the only one, but that is about it, and its virtual. Women still desire the top 20% of men, but the top 20% of men in her local hometown likely would not be the top 20% of men in an almost global sense.

This resulted in a lot of men being left out entirely, about 1/3 of all men likely will have no prospects for dating and they get no attention from women either. Its such a sad state that men like that are so lonely for female attention that they pay an e-thot money to mention their user name. That is so sad.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
... continue reading thread?
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 4 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 9 ▼
– Oppressinator 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

Women aren't funny.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– Oppressinator 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

You can be a terrible person and still be funny. But what it requires is a unsatisfied need for socialization and attention. If you can get that attention and praise elsewhere, then the need to grind out a sense of humor is gone. And even worse for a sense of humor, sometimes people will complement unfunny but powerful people's jokes, reinforcing bad humor. "haha, boss, your joke was so funny, please don't fire me" "wow hot chick, you're so humorous, sleep with me" "minority vent humor is amazing, I will lick your boots clean" "buff jock is so funny and relatable, and not at all threatening"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– Oppressinator 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

Oh I wasn't thinking being a terrible person on a macro scale, where all you think about is hate, but moreso on a personal scale. Think about how many actors are complete shitheads, druggies, sex fiends, but as long as the haha's flow, all is brushed under the rug. Kevin Spacey fucks teenage boys but he's incredibly talented, for instance. Chevy Chase is by many accounts a complete asshole and Bill Murray is impossible to work with and bitches and moans constantly, but on camera things look good.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– SupremeReader [S] 9 points 4 years ago +9 / -0

Nathan Grayson of the GamerGate infamy is defending her by calling it just "acts that can be constructed as sexual" and I just hope she's not fucking him for that, too. Or the twitch mods. I prefer to think their white knighting never get answered by a fair lady at all, but I don't fucking know anymore. These Snow White news broke my mind and everything is possible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– SupremeReader [S] 10 points 4 years ago +10 / -0

There are also more videos like that but I just saw enough. It's just uncomfortable how degrading it looks, despite not being outright porn.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– SupremeReader [S] 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Actually wondered would you enjoy seeing this.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– deleted 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– yvaN_ehT_nioJ 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

You know, I honestly think porn would be less degrading than this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– KekistanPM 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Meanwhile in an alternate universe, people are flocking to watch scientists and engineers discuss how their work contributed to increasing food supply, curing certain diseases; and spar over the merits of various unproven theories.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– deleted 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I hope she at least got a couple grand for that. Certainly it's an L if those 30 seconds didn't pay her rent/mortgage for the month. Probably a W if they paid for a new car.

A defining feature of modernity is how little people sell their dignity for.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– tobeornotto 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It's going to take a lot more than a couple of grand to make a celebrity embarass and humiliate themselves in public.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

I'm not sure I'd consider her a "celebrity".

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– deleted 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0
▲ 6 ▼
– lgbtqwtfbbq 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

This is a bit different than some simp paying 10 grand to fly some e-girl out to go on a chaste "date". That's "fleeting attention" and is something two people who cared about each other would do voluntarily. This is putting on a horse mask and pretending to be a horse. That's debasing yourself, and I don't think a person would ask or expect someone they cared about to do this for them.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– deleted 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy