The lack of enforced monogamy among the hypergamous gender drives lesser men into pararomantic relationships out of desperation for female attention, while women become enslaved to capital accumulation through acts of degradation that makes them undesirable to higher value men, i.e. feminism.
I agree with the middle, but the start and end are ridiculous.
We don't need enforced monogamy, women benefit too much from a tradcon system. We need a market correction in the dating market. I just don't know how on earth it can be done.
Right now, women are more overvalued than Tesla stock.
yep, the state of nonexistent monogamy. In 2007 the year that the smart phone, the first iphone was released, which allowed the general public easy access to the internet, which was formerly the domain of the more tech savvy and those who had the hardware and infrastructure for it.
The availability of internet for the general public and massive social media sites meant that women could fish in a much larger pool. And while women have always desired the top 20% of men, before the internet, a womans pool for male options was her social circle and surrounding area be it her hometown, college town, or area/city she frequently visited. The internet increased a womans option pool to seemingly no limits, maybe the language barrier is the only one, but that is about it, and its virtual. Women still desire the top 20% of men, but the top 20% of men in her local hometown likely would not be the top 20% of men in an almost global sense.
This resulted in a lot of men being left out entirely, about 1/3 of all men likely will have no prospects for dating and they get no attention from women either. Its such a sad state that men like that are so lonely for female attention that they pay an e-thot money to mention their user name. That is so sad.
The lack of enforced monogamy among the hypergamous gender drives lesser men into pararomantic relationships out of desperation for female attention, while women become enslaved to capital accumulation through acts of degradation that makes them undesirable to higher value men, i.e. feminism.
It hurts the available capital for whores, but women as whole end up in the same position as they ultimately control their men's capital.
It hurts Babylonian capital.
Hurt. Massively.
You're providing for an extra unwanted liability.
I agree with the middle, but the start and end are ridiculous.
We don't need enforced monogamy, women benefit too much from a tradcon system. We need a market correction in the dating market. I just don't know how on earth it can be done.
Right now, women are more overvalued than Tesla stock.
yep, the state of nonexistent monogamy. In 2007 the year that the smart phone, the first iphone was released, which allowed the general public easy access to the internet, which was formerly the domain of the more tech savvy and those who had the hardware and infrastructure for it.
The availability of internet for the general public and massive social media sites meant that women could fish in a much larger pool. And while women have always desired the top 20% of men, before the internet, a womans pool for male options was her social circle and surrounding area be it her hometown, college town, or area/city she frequently visited. The internet increased a womans option pool to seemingly no limits, maybe the language barrier is the only one, but that is about it, and its virtual. Women still desire the top 20% of men, but the top 20% of men in her local hometown likely would not be the top 20% of men in an almost global sense.
This resulted in a lot of men being left out entirely, about 1/3 of all men likely will have no prospects for dating and they get no attention from women either. Its such a sad state that men like that are so lonely for female attention that they pay an e-thot money to mention their user name. That is so sad.