Simple. Any time a husband and wife kiss, in order for it not to seem risqué it must be followed up with a full penetration sex scene, followed by an up close and personal birthing scene.
And that’s what we call putting it in her loop hole.
a G-rated film being "too sexual" to some busybody
a) SEX, noun [L. sexus; from L. seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". They use rhetoric like sex to divide our comprehension of intercourse representing the choice between procreation (need for the sustenance of life) and lust (temptation luring towards death); to then exploit our ignorance to deceive us to consent to lust aka self destruction.
b) they suggest ratings to shirk responsibility for suggesting self destruction onto those who consent to it.
c) consent to believe in suggested ratings causes a conflict of reason (true vs false) between those who believe them and those who do not. That's called division (reason) by suggestion (belief).
d) "some busybody" represents you shirking responsibility over self onto others by blaming them; and also those busybodies who nonstop (in adherence to flow) report things being "too sexual" are utilizing talmudic reasoning to deliberately contradict both the believers and the non-believers. Why? To keep the conflict of reason going aka the division through suggestion; needed to maintain the ongoing flow of suggested self destruction.
As long as the many are reasoning about how filthy the suggested filth is; the few can dumb filth upon them without any opposition. Reason is not an resistance to action; it is the belief based ignorance of responsibility over choice of action (free will) ; which is btw also why the so called talmud teaches implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
The "promoter" of temptation to form represents flow. The few are racketeering the ignorance of the many towards natural law. ONE cannot stop the temptation caused by ALL; ONE needs to teach/learn responsibility over choice (free will) of action; which is needed for ONEs self sustenance as form within ALL flow.
The happy merchants of temptations ruthlessly exploit offer/consent under natural law; based on the ignorance of the majority inspiring them to do so.
They already hate us so bad. Like I have seen multiple accepting and loving leftist on Reddit say my whole country should be colonized by Germany now, so they can teach us to be more accepting and tolerant.
I have no more questions about them.
"The opposition boycotted the vote except for lawmakers from the nationalist Jobbik party who supported the changes."
This is a tactic insane opposition parties in the west LOVE to pull. They love to "boycott" votes and then when it passes unanimously, they complain that they're being oppressed. Yes, really - they refuse to use the power people elected them to use, and they complain about it. Lmao. Then international media smears the government for being oppressive (yes, it works sometimes, in terms of optics).
I don't fully agree with this though, it's a pretty shitty and overly broad law, unless the article is dishonest. Teaching kids gay and straight people exist is fine, but obviously LGBT advocacy aimed at kids is grooming and should be prosecuted. Also "minors" seems way too broad. I'm undecided on this so far.
Teaching kids gay and straight people exist is fine
Why?
This doesn't benefit kids in anyway. Gays are, by the very rules of Natural Selection, unnatural. There is literally no reason or benefit to teach kids about this. It's like teaching kids that herpes exist. Why?
What a completely nonsensical question. If you're going to teach kids about sexuality, you're going to tell them that there's a small amount of people who like the same sex too because it's factual and pertinent, and you'd think knowing things would be seen as a good thing. Brains don't have a limited capacity, you're not going to run out of memory, lmao.
If you're going to teach kids about sexuality, you're going to tell them that there's a small amount of people who like the same sex too because it's factual and pertinent,
People engage in BDSM and watersports, too. So should kids learn about those fetishes as well because they're factual?
You provided a non-answer for a question in response to an asinine statement.
As I said, there is ZERO reasons why kids need to be taught about homosexuality in any capacity. It provides a net zero benefit to their knowledge base and there is ZERO benefit to include any aspect of that knowledge to their life.
There is no argument you can make to justify why kids should learn it, because despite it being factual (like a lot of perverse things are), it is in no way pertinent.
That's baby level punishment. They do what they call The Rack, which ties the limbs and head of the punished and slap the horses at the end to peel off every limb and heads with brute force.
"pornography and content that depicts sexuality for its own purposes or that promotes deviation from gender identity, gender reassignment and homosexuality shall not be made available to persons under the age of 18," the legal text said.
...Isn't this a nothingburger? Like, why so mad, saltpiles? Note the quote source. Not a rewording by a politician. "The legal text said".
This isn't going to ban Will And Grace reruns. This doesn't ban gay people being on TV. It bans sexuality for the purpose of promoting deviation (or purposeless sexuality). Given the wording of pornography and content depicting sexuality (blah blah), this is a porn ban. You can't show sex content to children except for educational purposes like Sex Ed. This clarifies that grooming, while not "for it's own purposes", is still not allowed and doesn't skirt around the law.
Don't worry about it. It's like you saltpiles always say: Slippery slopes don't exist. This is simply a minor singular legislation that will never snowball, because slippery slope is a fallacy, isn't it? That's what the saltpiles say every time the shoe is on the other foot, after all.
This would not have been need it if the education was just about there are gay and trans people and that is ok if you are. Now education is about celebrating and encouraging gay and trans and the oversexualize children.
there are gay and trans people and that is ok if you are.
It's not okay to be trans. If it is at all possible a transsexual should be persuaded that their true sex is not a flaw to be corrected, because this self-hatred will only drive them to cause harm to themselves and other people.
I agree, that is what they should teach. Being trans is a problem but society will not judge you for it.
Even for gays I wish they thought children to stay the fuck away from the gay lifestyle. And although I've not looked at stats I would not be surprised if mental problems like high anxiety and depression to be higher in gays, even with full support.
Acknowledging all of this issues would be much healthier then drag queen story hour and parades of flamboyant oversexualized freaks.
And although I've not looked at stats I would not be surprised if mental problems like high anxiety and depression to be higher in gays, even with full support.
It is higher even in extremely accepting cultures. You can't just hand-wave anxieties due to the fact you'll never have a normal family and make children of your own. The vast majority of humans want that, or they will feel a void in their life as they grow into adulthood.
And although I've not looked at stats I would not be surprised if mental problems like high anxiety and depression to be higher in gays, even with full support.
And it has nothing to do with "because of the straights!"
Those are stats from gay groups within GAY communities.
As RoulerBleu pointed out, they're fighting with their own biology. Humans are sexually dimorphic, and when you start trying to normalize a lifestyle where you're with the same gender, working against producing a genetic lineage, it does affect your neurological homeostasis.
This is why I always say that promoting the gay lifestyle and gay representation is not good. It's absolutely abhorrent for building a healthy and stable society.
Many of these people need serious psychiatric help, not endorsements, or "representation".
EDIT: As an addendum, if someone wants to be gay, they can be gay. I genuinely don't care what someone's personal preferences are. But promoting a dangerous lifestyle to kids should always be off limits.
I love it but it will be bad for Hungary. It will give the rest of the globalist leaders in EU reason to push anti-Hungarian policies and will end up with putting a globalist puppet in power in Hungary.
Well, we have been doing the same since forever. Like what? We already said fuck no about rapefugees, you can't get an accredited gender studies education, we refused the Black Lies Matter shit, you can't change your gender legally here, etc.
If they are going to bring the libtars scourge, they already have a reason. That's like saying "oh, don't make this joke, it's bad publicity and we will be called Nazis". They were going to try the same leftist fascist thing no matter what, being the cancer they are.
I fully support Hugary banning glorification of homosexual acts to kids considering it absolutely was a slippery slope for degeneracy indoctrination and denial of basic human biological reality in the West.
I don't hate that I find hot dudes hot. Feeling embarasingly stupid and butterflies in your gut because you are struck at how attractive you find someone is a rather beautiful part of the human experience. No point in hating that.
It's not society "brainwashing" me to feel sad that I am not normal.
It's not highschool "faggot insults" either.
Turbo-Sluts who made HIV and other STDs so prevalent among gay men, however, that contributed to my decision to never fuck a dude.
But the real reason it sucks : You're not 20 forever. At some point you contemplate where you and your ancestors came from, and what you will leave behind.
So it's the "never being able to have a nornal relationship and make children of my own with a loving partner" that is a source of emotional distress.
You can't fix that with a parade full of degenerate sex pests, or brainwashing programs to kids.
Childhood innocent implies adulthood guilt...banning promotion of sodomy (defilement of procreation) to protect childhood innocence represents covering the symptoms of adulthood guilt; while ignoring the cause...the choice of ignorance of the many towards the suggested defilement of procreation (sodomy) by the few.
Why do the few suggest sodomy? To get the many to consent to the destruction of life by falling for the temptation of lust aka genocide by suggestion of temptation towards free will of choice.
Simple. Any time a husband and wife kiss, in order for it not to seem risqué it must be followed up with a full penetration sex scene, followed by an up close and personal birthing scene.
And that’s what we call putting it in her loop hole.
a) SEX, noun [L. sexus; from L. seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female". They use rhetoric like sex to divide our comprehension of intercourse representing the choice between procreation (need for the sustenance of life) and lust (temptation luring towards death); to then exploit our ignorance to deceive us to consent to lust aka self destruction.
b) they suggest ratings to shirk responsibility for suggesting self destruction onto those who consent to it.
c) consent to believe in suggested ratings causes a conflict of reason (true vs false) between those who believe them and those who do not. That's called division (reason) by suggestion (belief).
d) "some busybody" represents you shirking responsibility over self onto others by blaming them; and also those busybodies who nonstop (in adherence to flow) report things being "too sexual" are utilizing talmudic reasoning to deliberately contradict both the believers and the non-believers. Why? To keep the conflict of reason going aka the division through suggestion; needed to maintain the ongoing flow of suggested self destruction.
As long as the many are reasoning about how filthy the suggested filth is; the few can dumb filth upon them without any opposition. Reason is not an resistance to action; it is the belief based ignorance of responsibility over choice of action (free will) ; which is btw also why the so called talmud teaches implication (if/then) over reason (true vs false).
The "promoter" of temptation to form represents flow. The few are racketeering the ignorance of the many towards natural law. ONE cannot stop the temptation caused by ALL; ONE needs to teach/learn responsibility over choice (free will) of action; which is needed for ONEs self sustenance as form within ALL flow.
The happy merchants of temptations ruthlessly exploit offer/consent under natural law; based on the ignorance of the majority inspiring them to do so.
Reddit admins will be furious
They already hate us so bad. Like I have seen multiple accepting and loving leftist on Reddit say my whole country should be colonized by Germany now, so they can teach us to be more accepting and tolerant.
I have no more questions about them.
I'm not going to go look but I can only imagine they're all rage dilating right now, clenched teeth, guttural grunting, the full shabang.
Mods dilating will be though tonight while they will be litterally shaking.
"The opposition boycotted the vote except for lawmakers from the nationalist Jobbik party who supported the changes."
This is a tactic insane opposition parties in the west LOVE to pull. They love to "boycott" votes and then when it passes unanimously, they complain that they're being oppressed. Yes, really - they refuse to use the power people elected them to use, and they complain about it. Lmao. Then international media smears the government for being oppressive (yes, it works sometimes, in terms of optics).
I don't fully agree with this though, it's a pretty shitty and overly broad law, unless the article is dishonest. Teaching kids gay and straight people exist is fine, but obviously LGBT advocacy aimed at kids is grooming and should be prosecuted. Also "minors" seems way too broad. I'm undecided on this so far.
Why?
This doesn't benefit kids in anyway. Gays are, by the very rules of Natural Selection, unnatural. There is literally no reason or benefit to teach kids about this. It's like teaching kids that herpes exist. Why?
What a completely nonsensical question. If you're going to teach kids about sexuality, you're going to tell them that there's a small amount of people who like the same sex too because it's factual and pertinent, and you'd think knowing things would be seen as a good thing. Brains don't have a limited capacity, you're not going to run out of memory, lmao.
People engage in BDSM and watersports, too. So should kids learn about those fetishes as well because they're factual?
You provided a non-answer for a question in response to an asinine statement.
As I said, there is ZERO reasons why kids need to be taught about homosexuality in any capacity. It provides a net zero benefit to their knowledge base and there is ZERO benefit to include any aspect of that knowledge to their life.
There is no argument you can make to justify why kids should learn it, because despite it being factual (like a lot of perverse things are), it is in no way pertinent.
Based and Hunpilled
Your namesake would so whip xou.
Flay.
Lasso xir and drag behind on a horse.
That's baby level punishment. They do what they call The Rack, which ties the limbs and head of the punished and slap the horses at the end to peel off every limb and heads with brute force.
...Isn't this a nothingburger? Like, why so mad, saltpiles? Note the quote source. Not a rewording by a politician. "The legal text said".
This isn't going to ban Will And Grace reruns. This doesn't ban gay people being on TV. It bans sexuality for the purpose of promoting deviation (or purposeless sexuality). Given the wording of pornography and content depicting sexuality (blah blah), this is a porn ban. You can't show sex content to children except for educational purposes like Sex Ed. This clarifies that grooming, while not "for it's own purposes", is still not allowed and doesn't skirt around the law.
Don't worry about it. It's like you saltpiles always say: Slippery slopes don't exist. This is simply a minor singular legislation that will never snowball, because slippery slope is a fallacy, isn't it? That's what the saltpiles say every time the shoe is on the other foot, after all.
This would not have been need it if the education was just about there are gay and trans people and that is ok if you are. Now education is about celebrating and encouraging gay and trans and the oversexualize children.
It's not okay to be trans. If it is at all possible a transsexual should be persuaded that their true sex is not a flaw to be corrected, because this self-hatred will only drive them to cause harm to themselves and other people.
I agree, that is what they should teach. Being trans is a problem but society will not judge you for it. Even for gays I wish they thought children to stay the fuck away from the gay lifestyle. And although I've not looked at stats I would not be surprised if mental problems like high anxiety and depression to be higher in gays, even with full support.
Acknowledging all of this issues would be much healthier then drag queen story hour and parades of flamboyant oversexualized freaks.
It is higher even in extremely accepting cultures. You can't just hand-wave anxieties due to the fact you'll never have a normal family and make children of your own. The vast majority of humans want that, or they will feel a void in their life as they grow into adulthood.
Your inclination is spot on.
Higher depression, higher suicide rates, and higher substance abuse rates: https://archive.is/rXYPi https://archive.is/wip/jCqVP
And it has nothing to do with "because of the straights!"
Those are stats from gay groups within GAY communities.
As RoulerBleu pointed out, they're fighting with their own biology. Humans are sexually dimorphic, and when you start trying to normalize a lifestyle where you're with the same gender, working against producing a genetic lineage, it does affect your neurological homeostasis.
This is why I always say that promoting the gay lifestyle and gay representation is not good. It's absolutely abhorrent for building a healthy and stable society.
Many of these people need serious psychiatric help, not endorsements, or "representation".
EDIT: As an addendum, if someone wants to be gay, they can be gay. I genuinely don't care what someone's personal preferences are. But promoting a dangerous lifestyle to kids should always be off limits.
I love it but it will be bad for Hungary. It will give the rest of the globalist leaders in EU reason to push anti-Hungarian policies and will end up with putting a globalist puppet in power in Hungary.
Well, we have been doing the same since forever. Like what? We already said fuck no about rapefugees, you can't get an accredited gender studies education, we refused the Black Lies Matter shit, you can't change your gender legally here, etc.
If they are going to bring the libtars scourge, they already have a reason. That's like saying "oh, don't make this joke, it's bad publicity and we will be called Nazis". They were going to try the same leftist fascist thing no matter what, being the cancer they are.
The blood of soros (allegedly three wives; five children) resides in Hungary.
Faggot here.
I fully support Hugary banning glorification of homosexual acts to kids considering it absolutely was a slippery slope for degeneracy indoctrination and denial of basic human biological reality in the West.
I don't hate that I find hot dudes hot. Feeling embarasingly stupid and butterflies in your gut because you are struck at how attractive you find someone is a rather beautiful part of the human experience. No point in hating that.
It's not society "brainwashing" me to feel sad that I am not normal.
It's not highschool "faggot insults" either.
Turbo-Sluts who made HIV and other STDs so prevalent among gay men, however, that contributed to my decision to never fuck a dude.
But the real reason it sucks : You're not 20 forever. At some point you contemplate where you and your ancestors came from, and what you will leave behind.
So it's the "never being able to have a nornal relationship and make children of my own with a loving partner" that is a source of emotional distress.
You can't fix that with a parade full of degenerate sex pests, or brainwashing programs to kids.
Childhood innocent implies adulthood guilt...banning promotion of sodomy (defilement of procreation) to protect childhood innocence represents covering the symptoms of adulthood guilt; while ignoring the cause...the choice of ignorance of the many towards the suggested defilement of procreation (sodomy) by the few.
Why do the few suggest sodomy? To get the many to consent to the destruction of life by falling for the temptation of lust aka genocide by suggestion of temptation towards free will of choice.