"pornography and content that depicts sexuality for its own purposes or that promotes deviation from gender identity, gender reassignment and homosexuality shall not be made available to persons under the age of 18," the legal text said.
...Isn't this a nothingburger? Like, why so mad, saltpiles? Note the quote source. Not a rewording by a politician. "The legal text said".
This isn't going to ban Will And Grace reruns. This doesn't ban gay people being on TV. It bans sexuality for the purpose of promoting deviation (or purposeless sexuality). Given the wording of pornography and content depicting sexuality (blah blah), this is a porn ban. You can't show sex content to children except for educational purposes like Sex Ed. This clarifies that grooming, while not "for it's own purposes", is still not allowed and doesn't skirt around the law.
Don't worry about it. It's like you saltpiles always say: Slippery slopes don't exist. This is simply a minor singular legislation that will never snowball, because slippery slope is a fallacy, isn't it? That's what the saltpiles say every time the shoe is on the other foot, after all.
...Isn't this a nothingburger? Like, why so mad, saltpiles? Note the quote source. Not a rewording by a politician. "The legal text said".
This isn't going to ban Will And Grace reruns. This doesn't ban gay people being on TV. It bans sexuality for the purpose of promoting deviation (or purposeless sexuality). Given the wording of pornography and content depicting sexuality (blah blah), this is a porn ban. You can't show sex content to children except for educational purposes like Sex Ed. This clarifies that grooming, while not "for it's own purposes", is still not allowed and doesn't skirt around the law.
Don't worry about it. It's like you saltpiles always say: Slippery slopes don't exist. This is simply a minor singular legislation that will never snowball, because slippery slope is a fallacy, isn't it? That's what the saltpiles say every time the shoe is on the other foot, after all.