And now you have the "anti-racists" saying that to sell birth control and Western ways to the highest-breeders, and telling them not to breed more than they can feed, is "racist" and we should shut up about it, and just keep shovelling food in their mouths and letting them steal more and more land from the wildlife they also slaughter and devour with impunity. All because the Economist demons want more and more inbred, cousin-fucking retards for to spend money and "consoom" LIKE GIANT LOCUSTS.
It released to extremely minimal fanfare, so I doubt it. We barely got the slew of articles about how powerful and amazing it is that usually follow every Disney movie.
It seems like even Disney gave up on the project partway through if some of the CGI is considered.
Sounds like they know what they are getting into when they sign the contract, like a freelancer, one time pay, not royalties. Don't like, there's plenty of others to take your place, there's a glut of fashion designers. Don't complain after the fact, sign better contracts. It's like the woman's soccer team. You have to stand by what you signed unless it was legitimate Hollywood contract flimflam accounting (You signed for profits not gross and guess what there's never any profits).
She's the very symbol of the evil of the fur trade.
The original book was written in response to places like Sak's actually selling dog skins under the label "Chinese coyote".
Let's be real. It's not about art, it's about holding onto the copyright.
Don Bluth quit because he was tired of being told to dig for ideas in Walt's notes.
sonic bad
harley quinn good.
And now you have the "anti-racists" saying that to sell birth control and Western ways to the highest-breeders, and telling them not to breed more than they can feed, is "racist" and we should shut up about it, and just keep shovelling food in their mouths and letting them steal more and more land from the wildlife they also slaughter and devour with impunity. All because the Economist demons want more and more inbred, cousin-fucking retards for to spend money and "consoom" LIKE GIANT LOCUSTS.
WHO WILL CULL THE MASTER SPECIES?
Was anyone hyped for this? (outside the trans community on twitter)
Why would trans community like it? Cruella is a woman right? Sorry I’m out of the loop with this film
The stupid ass high fashion where everyone looks like a drag queen is my guess as to why trannies would jizz themselves over it.
I had a racist/ anti-homo friend and his wife over for a grill the other day and they said it was fun. My wife and I suffered through most of it.
My review: Only niggers are "good" people, the movie. Everyone else is gay/trans/evil/incompetent/etc.
Although I'd like to see a sympathetic backstory of the little dog Wink and how he lost his eye.
It released to extremely minimal fanfare, so I doubt it. We barely got the slew of articles about how powerful and amazing it is that usually follow every Disney movie.
It seems like even Disney gave up on the project partway through if some of the CGI is considered.
I heard a funny comment from some Youtubers I watch that suggested there should be a franchise crossover: Cruella and John Wick.
Sounds like they know what they are getting into when they sign the contract, like a freelancer, one time pay, not royalties. Don't like, there's plenty of others to take your place, there's a glut of fashion designers. Don't complain after the fact, sign better contracts. It's like the woman's soccer team. You have to stand by what you signed unless it was legitimate Hollywood contract flimflam accounting (You signed for profits not gross and guess what there's never any profits).
♫♪ na na na, ♫♪ na na na, ♪ na, ♫ na na
https://hooktube.com/watch?v=TyWVaZsUQjc
Sorry. You gotta admit, it's catchy.