I remember reading about lynchings a while back, popular cases and whatnot. The largest lynching in America was of Italian mobsters that murdered the beloved police chief and by either corruption or technicality or something had them innocent. The entire white town stormed the jail, dragged them from their cells and lynched the 10 of them in the square.
The rest of American lynchings are largely similar: mob justice when the system was going to let guilty men roam free. It's not great, but it's a far-cry from what I was taught in school where the KKK would lynch some black guy for just walking down the street.
The rest of American lynchings are largely similar: mob justice when the system was going to let guilty men roam free.
Absolute fucking nonsense, when many lynchings were conducted after convictions of people, when the police literally handed suspects over to the mob. One of the lynchings in The United States of Lyncherdom written by Mark Twain cited a lynching that was stopped by police who mob attackers who stormed a police station when they were told the execution of the convict would take place the next day.
Lynchers are violent savages who are engaging in the highest form of virtue signaling. They do not, never have, and never will, care about the individual case compared to how good it may make them feel or look to tell everyone how they have so much solidarity with an allegedly aggrieved community that they can slaughter people without cause.
This is one of the reasons the 2nd amendment is so important: lynch mobs should be killed on sight by their victims.
But I suppose the failed lynching of Kyle Rittenhouse was just a natural response of a loving community that had seen far too many white people go free from murder, and they didn't want to let yet another white active shooter go; right?
Maybe you're right. This probably falls into "vengeance is for the Lord" territory.
I think I'm just too frustrated with being beaten over the head about how bad America/whites are for lynchings. I see some shrill harpy screeching at people for 'racism' and think "Maybe the old ways weren't so bad".
Also they actually first set her on fire but this didn't kill her, and they cut her stomach when she was still alive. She was hanged upside down by her feet, not hanged by her neck. It was way worse then I remembered it.
The largest lynching was of many (exact number unknown) local blacks after one killed a white man, in the early 20th. They included a pregnant woman who complained after her husband was killed, and they hanged and shot up her, then cut off her unborn baby and stomped it, and finally burned her body.
Yeah, no. Non-whites have been chimping out for decades. It can be scary, sure, but we've seen plenty of it.
Wanna see something really scary? Crack a history book and see what happens when white people get angry.
In the past, white people got angry and did things in reaction to less than what they put up with today
I remember reading about lynchings a while back, popular cases and whatnot. The largest lynching in America was of Italian mobsters that murdered the beloved police chief and by either corruption or technicality or something had them innocent. The entire white town stormed the jail, dragged them from their cells and lynched the 10 of them in the square.
The rest of American lynchings are largely similar: mob justice when the system was going to let guilty men roam free. It's not great, but it's a far-cry from what I was taught in school where the KKK would lynch some black guy for just walking down the street.
Absolute fucking nonsense, when many lynchings were conducted after convictions of people, when the police literally handed suspects over to the mob. One of the lynchings in The United States of Lyncherdom written by Mark Twain cited a lynching that was stopped by police who mob attackers who stormed a police station when they were told the execution of the convict would take place the next day.
Lynchers are violent savages who are engaging in the highest form of virtue signaling. They do not, never have, and never will, care about the individual case compared to how good it may make them feel or look to tell everyone how they have so much solidarity with an allegedly aggrieved community that they can slaughter people without cause.
This is one of the reasons the 2nd amendment is so important: lynch mobs should be killed on sight by their victims.
But I suppose the failed lynching of Kyle Rittenhouse was just a natural response of a loving community that had seen far too many white people go free from murder, and they didn't want to let yet another white active shooter go; right?
Maybe you're right. This probably falls into "vengeance is for the Lord" territory.
I think I'm just too frustrated with being beaten over the head about how bad America/whites are for lynchings. I see some shrill harpy screeching at people for 'racism' and think "Maybe the old ways weren't so bad".
Also they actually first set her on fire but this didn't kill her, and they cut her stomach when she was still alive. She was hanged upside down by her feet, not hanged by her neck. It was way worse then I remembered it.
Ok that's straight up pagan depravity
The largest lynching was of many (exact number unknown) local blacks after one killed a white man, in the early 20th. They included a pregnant woman who complained after her husband was killed, and they hanged and shot up her, then cut off her unborn baby and stomped it, and finally burned her body.
Blacks wouldn't be burning cities every summer if this was our response every time they tried to.
Something something something, the day the Anglo Saxons learned to hate...