Okay, but who will sue the doctor or even know of an individual gets an abortion after 6 weeks? Or, are those records public?
Edit: by the way, 6 weeks sounds like enough time to me. C'mon, ladies. Toy should know whether someone spray painted your cervical walls with baby batter or not. That should be something you're at least mildly aware of and can keep track of.
Thanks for giving attention to this.
I've been out of the weeds, and seeing all these headlines about the Right using the same tactics as the Left made me disillusioned. Titles such as "Governor forces schools to open" or "Governor bans mask mandates in stores", if taken at face values, just create problems down the line.
You need to give people the ability to make right or wrong decisions, so that they suffer alone and don't drag others down with them. Being correct is no excuse to be authoritarian.
There is precedent, which is sacrosanct for courts.
Title IX "abuses" can be sued and reported from anywhere in America against anywhere in America, by anyone. There's a well-known middle-aged MRA who has sued dozens, if not hundreds, of universities and colleges over their favoritism of women in their policies. And won most of the cases. But he's some middle-aged man in one state, not a prospective student, not in the school, not even in the market to be in a school in the future, and nowhere near most of the schools in question.
He has zero "standing", but because of the way the law was worded, literally everyone everywhere at all times has more or less a "deemed" "standing". If that concept is used as precedent in this... The result is more likely than you'd think.
Okay, but who will sue the doctor or even know of an individual gets an abortion after 6 weeks? Or, are those records public?
Edit: by the way, 6 weeks sounds like enough time to me. C'mon, ladies. Toy should know whether someone spray painted your cervical walls with baby batter or not. That should be something you're at least mildly aware of and can keep track of.
If you post about it on Instagram and Snapchat it is. Remember, abortion selfies are a thing.
"The grieving dad who wanted a family" is one possibility.
Thanks for giving attention to this.
I've been out of the weeds, and seeing all these headlines about the Right using the same tactics as the Left made me disillusioned. Titles such as "Governor forces schools to open" or "Governor bans mask mandates in stores", if taken at face values, just create problems down the line.
You need to give people the ability to make right or wrong decisions, so that they suffer alone and don't drag others down with them. Being correct is no excuse to be authoritarian.
Interesting twist. Would courts actually think any 3rd party has "standing" to bring these cases?
There is precedent, which is sacrosanct for courts.
Title IX "abuses" can be sued and reported from anywhere in America against anywhere in America, by anyone. There's a well-known middle-aged MRA who has sued dozens, if not hundreds, of universities and colleges over their favoritism of women in their policies. And won most of the cases. But he's some middle-aged man in one state, not a prospective student, not in the school, not even in the market to be in a school in the future, and nowhere near most of the schools in question.
He has zero "standing", but because of the way the law was worded, literally everyone everywhere at all times has more or less a "deemed" "standing". If that concept is used as precedent in this... The result is more likely than you'd think.
Presumably, yes. And even if not, she could just identify as male for the duration of the court appearance, anyways.
I remember when the stories of China doing this to up the number of boys born under the one child rule in the 70s came out, fems were outraged.
I think it was the 70s anyway.
Abortion as birth control is Satanic.
Also wouldn't that basically count as eugenics? I'm with you 100% on this one.