There is precedent, which is sacrosanct for courts.
Title IX "abuses" can be sued and reported from anywhere in America against anywhere in America, by anyone. There's a well-known middle-aged MRA who has sued dozens, if not hundreds, of universities and colleges over their favoritism of women in their policies. And won most of the cases. But he's some middle-aged man in one state, not a prospective student, not in the school, not even in the market to be in a school in the future, and nowhere near most of the schools in question.
He has zero "standing", but because of the way the law was worded, literally everyone everywhere at all times has more or less a "deemed" "standing". If that concept is used as precedent in this... The result is more likely than you'd think.
There is precedent, which is sacrosanct for courts.
Title IX "abuses" can be sued and reported from anywhere in America against anywhere in America, by anyone. There's a well-known middle-aged MRA who has sued dozens, if not hundreds, of universities and colleges over their favoritism of women in their policies. And won most of the cases. But he's some middle-aged man in one state, not a prospective student, not in the school, not even in the market to be in a school in the future, and nowhere near most of the schools in question.
He has zero "standing", but because of the way the law was worded, literally everyone everywhere at all times has more or less a "deemed" "standing". If that concept is used as precedent in this... The result is more likely than you'd think.
Presumably, yes. And even if not, she could just identify as male for the duration of the court appearance, anyways.