Just like Trump Derangement Syndrome in the U.S., these leftists in India have Modi Derangement Syndrome.
It seems it doesn't matter which country you look at, the left hates the majority ethnic group in that country and pushes for minorities usurping the nation.
Minorities can be exploited as their ticket to power.
Note that the left in India does not favor all minorities. But rather, the Muslim minority. The Indian National Congress, which is the globalist/neoliberal party in India, actually staged a series of vigilante massacres where Sikhs were burned alive as retaliation for a Sikh bodyguard murdering Indira Gandhi.
They went around cities with lists of names of Sikhs, and just brutally murdered them.
Since then, the Sikhs have been loyal supporters of the "Hindu nationalist" BJP.
Correct, these people exist to be subversive to the established order, and then run apologetics to Leftism. The majority would be rounded up and shot under Communism. Only under Fabianism is this allowed to continue because the process is so slow. The survivors would be die-hard party loyalists who would never defy the new Communist orthodoxy.
Once again proves that people are more divided by class than by ethnicity.
Rich men from different countries are divided only by language.
Rich men and poor men of the same country are divided by all aspects of their lives.
I guess India is awkward in that regard then.
In 1st world where I live you take away the language barrier and the scotish gypsy and polish plumber can have a fruitful conversation.
Social media allowed for a drastic shift towards a globalism structure that hates local culture, national identity and diversity of thought. For all their claims for diversity they want every place on earth to be exactly the same.
I consider globalists as the biggest enemy of any country and what is worth is that they are elected to run this countries. Europe and Us are just ahead of the curve.
Do I have to link the entire "Anarchy USA" documentary from the John Birch Society to you, or do I have to point out the conduct of the Bolsheviks toward the end of WW1, or do I have to show you the level of abject evil the Leftists engaged in during the pre-Civil War period in Spain when they were lighting nuns on fire and the moderate Republicans claimed that 100 Catholic lives were worth one Republican life.
Wishing for death upon your political opponents is the normal policy of the Left. They took a breather because Communism imploded on itself and they were all kinda caught off guard while the Fabians tried to pretend that the situation was well in hand.
Bad news: the moderate Leftists is and always have been the useful idiots of the Leftists.
You know the event that caused May Day to occur?
A bunch of Center Left & Social Democrats were protesting to establish a minimum wage. The cops watched over the protest. A communist agitator threw fucking dynamite at the cops. The cops fired at the communists who were hiding behind the crowd of protesters. Several of the actual peaceful protesters were killed. Since then, every year, Communists have celebrated the intentional slaying of useful idiots to promote further revolution.
The mainstream Left exists to:
Repeat the Fabian narrative
Be the bullet sponge of the Radicals
Make apologetics for both
Belittle any dissent beyond their current position
The mainstream left calmed the fuck down in the 1980's and 1990's because while the Fabians had held onto their establishment control, the progressive left had gotten their asshole's blown out by Walter Mondale being absolutely obliterated by Reagan, and by the Soviet Union collapsing so rapidly that literally none of them saw it coming. The Fabians were left sitting on top of the world, unsure how to proceed since right-wing attitudes seemed to be ascendant and needed to be contained by "90's Democrat" mentality, and going full progressive or full socialist was clearly a bad idea.
But Fabians don't exist to go anywhere else, so we're right back where we started.
The Left are only being slightly more nonsensical because they don't have an authoritarian Leftist to lead them to victory (Hillary BTFO'd), so they are now a bunch of confused squabbling Bolsheviks as the Fabians desperately try to re-orient the entire world monetary system at the last minute before the whole system fucking implodes like the Soviet one did.
This is the Left normally. They just didn't have pretense to pretend that they were legitimate after the ending of the Vietnam War destroyed any desire for revolution that they could exploit, and left them waging war against average Americans who were finally getting tired of their shit.
The sentiment was always there. The problem was that available infrastructures and technologies at the time didn't provided them with feasible means to enact their plans.
Social media wasn't a thing, the discourse could not be fully controlled.
Not everyone had a trackable electronic device in their pocket.
The long march through the institutions was still in progress.
Makes no mistake, they always wanted all dissent dead and ruined. They simply didn't had the means to make it so.
If you can enslave and feed off of the productive class, while wielding absolute social and political control over them, you have "won". You now have a productive slave class you can freely torture via your unfounded, irrational resentment and feel absolutely justified in their enslavement and daily agony.
Look at white male suicide rates in the USA. No one gives a shit.
Look at marriage laws in India. No one gives a shit.
Men are actually going the tranny route to escape the torture. Men are walking away from society to escape the torture. This train rockets off the cliff in less than 10 years and there is nothing anyone in the world can do about it. Everyone in power knows. Shit is going to get raw and violent. Get fit. Get your T levels right. Prepare.
Nations being ethnostates and religiously homogenous have typically been the norm in history.
To push the idea of civic nationalism only in India but not in Saudi Arabia or Israel is folly.
I can agree with "Leftist countries are shit but I wouldn't want to live in a Muslim country either if I wasn't a Muslim, and it's similar for non-hindus in hindu-controlled areas."
When compared to Muslims, I do think Hindus are relatively based.
I don't see hordes of Hindus violently rampaging in European countries such as Sweden and Germany.
India doesn't actually even have it that bad. It appears to be leveling off and per-capita they are way below rates that many other countries have had.
Just like Trump Derangement Syndrome in the U.S., these leftists in India have Modi Derangement Syndrome.
It seems it doesn't matter which country you look at, the left hates the majority ethnic group in that country and pushes for minorities usurping the nation.
Minorities can be exploited as their ticket to power.
Note that the left in India does not favor all minorities. But rather, the Muslim minority. The Indian National Congress, which is the globalist/neoliberal party in India, actually staged a series of vigilante massacres where Sikhs were burned alive as retaliation for a Sikh bodyguard murdering Indira Gandhi.
They went around cities with lists of names of Sikhs, and just brutally murdered them.
Since then, the Sikhs have been loyal supporters of the "Hindu nationalist" BJP.
The leftist professors are unaware of the post-revolution reality:
Their shitty “gender studies” degree will get them shot or sent to a re-education camp.
Their degree is not only worthless in a capitalist society. Communists don’t want them either
Correct, these people exist to be subversive to the established order, and then run apologetics to Leftism. The majority would be rounded up and shot under Communism. Only under Fabianism is this allowed to continue because the process is so slow. The survivors would be die-hard party loyalists who would never defy the new Communist orthodoxy.
Redpill me on Modi. The only people I've ever seen trash on the guy are New York Indians, New York Nepalese, and New York Pakistanis.
Modi is a Hindu nationalist.
They hate him because he doesn't shill for Muslims like globalist Rahul Gandhi, the opposition to Modi does.
You mean Hindu nationalist like an Anglo nationalist? Pro-Indo-region Identity?
Once again proves that people are more divided by class than by ethnicity. Rich men from different countries are divided only by language. Rich men and poor men of the same country are divided by all aspects of their lives.
I guess India is awkward in that regard then. In 1st world where I live you take away the language barrier and the scotish gypsy and polish plumber can have a fruitful conversation.
Fair enough.
When did political differences become so important that people started wishing death on each other? This wasn't normal a while back, even on the left.
Social media allowed for a drastic shift towards a globalism structure that hates local culture, national identity and diversity of thought. For all their claims for diversity they want every place on earth to be exactly the same.
I consider globalists as the biggest enemy of any country and what is worth is that they are elected to run this countries. Europe and Us are just ahead of the curve.
Do I have to link the entire "Anarchy USA" documentary from the John Birch Society to you, or do I have to point out the conduct of the Bolsheviks toward the end of WW1, or do I have to show you the level of abject evil the Leftists engaged in during the pre-Civil War period in Spain when they were lighting nuns on fire and the moderate Republicans claimed that 100 Catholic lives were worth one Republican life.
Wishing for death upon your political opponents is the normal policy of the Left. They took a breather because Communism imploded on itself and they were all kinda caught off guard while the Fabians tried to pretend that the situation was well in hand.
But these are folks on the extreme left. The practice is now spreading to the ordinary left.
the extreme leftist slits your throat, the ordinary holds you down for the extreme
Bad news: the moderate Leftists is and always have been the useful idiots of the Leftists.
You know the event that caused May Day to occur?
A bunch of Center Left & Social Democrats were protesting to establish a minimum wage. The cops watched over the protest. A communist agitator threw fucking dynamite at the cops. The cops fired at the communists who were hiding behind the crowd of protesters. Several of the actual peaceful protesters were killed. Since then, every year, Communists have celebrated the intentional slaying of useful idiots to promote further revolution.
The mainstream Left exists to:
The mainstream left calmed the fuck down in the 1980's and 1990's because while the Fabians had held onto their establishment control, the progressive left had gotten their asshole's blown out by Walter Mondale being absolutely obliterated by Reagan, and by the Soviet Union collapsing so rapidly that literally none of them saw it coming. The Fabians were left sitting on top of the world, unsure how to proceed since right-wing attitudes seemed to be ascendant and needed to be contained by "90's Democrat" mentality, and going full progressive or full socialist was clearly a bad idea.
But Fabians don't exist to go anywhere else, so we're right back where we started.
The Left are only being slightly more nonsensical because they don't have an authoritarian Leftist to lead them to victory (Hillary BTFO'd), so they are now a bunch of confused squabbling Bolsheviks as the Fabians desperately try to re-orient the entire world monetary system at the last minute before the whole system fucking implodes like the Soviet one did.
This is the Left normally. They just didn't have pretense to pretend that they were legitimate after the ending of the Vietnam War destroyed any desire for revolution that they could exploit, and left them waging war against average Americans who were finally getting tired of their shit.
So the folks throwing the dynamite, right?
No no, the actual peaceful protesters.
No, the real ones.
The sentiment was always there. The problem was that available infrastructures and technologies at the time didn't provided them with feasible means to enact their plans.
Social media wasn't a thing, the discourse could not be fully controlled. Not everyone had a trackable electronic device in their pocket. The long march through the institutions was still in progress.
Makes no mistake, they always wanted all dissent dead and ruined. They simply didn't had the means to make it so.
Of course it was normal back when and it has always been the norm. Look at the Bible. If someone has hate in their heart they will death upon others.
If you can enslave and feed off of the productive class, while wielding absolute social and political control over them, you have "won". You now have a productive slave class you can freely torture via your unfounded, irrational resentment and feel absolutely justified in their enslavement and daily agony.
Look at white male suicide rates in the USA. No one gives a shit.
Look at marriage laws in India. No one gives a shit.
Men are actually going the tranny route to escape the torture. Men are walking away from society to escape the torture. This train rockets off the cliff in less than 10 years and there is nothing anyone in the world can do about it. Everyone in power knows. Shit is going to get raw and violent. Get fit. Get your T levels right. Prepare.
Probably another attempt at the Fabian Socialists to subvert China's rivals.
Correct, they're also bigoted as fuck. Both as racists, and as Sexists.
well it's their country.
India is a Hindu country and should remain as such. Leftists should shut the fuck up and stop using minorities as a tool to destroy India from within.
Muslim majority countries get to oppress all non Muslims but Hindus should be forced to tolerate other religions?
Fuck off with that bullshit.
You missed my point entirely.
India and Nepal are the only Hindu majority nations in the world.
Muslim majority countries don't tolerate any other religions.
Israel always ensures that they stay a Jewish country.
It is beyond hypocritical to demand Hindus be forced to do so when Muslims and Jews are free to have their own countries but Hindus cannot.
Nations being ethnostates and religiously homogenous have typically been the norm in history.
To push the idea of civic nationalism only in India but not in Saudi Arabia or Israel is folly.
I can agree with "Leftist countries are shit but I wouldn't want to live in a Muslim country either if I wasn't a Muslim, and it's similar for non-hindus in hindu-controlled areas."
When compared to Muslims, I do think Hindus are relatively based.
I don't see hordes of Hindus violently rampaging in European countries such as Sweden and Germany.
India doesn't actually even have it that bad. It appears to be leveling off and per-capita they are way below rates that many other countries have had.